Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Physician‐related facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making in early stage breast cancer

Perspectives of physicians and patients

Bibliographic Data

ID19508490
AuthorsMary Ann O’Brien (0000-0001-6093-1040, University of Toronto, corresponding author), Peter M Ellis (McMaster University), Timothy J Whelan (0000-0001-9844-2023, McMaster University), Cathy Charles (McMaster University), Amiram Gafni (0000-0001-8279-8172, McMaster University), Peter Lovrics (McMaster University), Som D Mukherjee (McMaster University), Nicole Hodgson (McMaster University)
Year2013
Volume16
Issue4
Pages373-384
Publication date2013-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00712.x
PMID21923813
OpenAlexW1501705820
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited41

Objective To identify patients’ and physicians’ perceptions of physician‐related verbal and nonverbal facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making (TDM) occurring during clinical encounters for women with early stage breast cancer (ESBC). Methods Eligible women were offered treatment options including surgery and adjuvant therapy. Eligible physicians provided care for women with ESBC in either a teaching hospital or an academic cancer centre. In Phase 1, women were interviewed 1–2 weeks after their initial consultation. In Phase 2, women and their physicians were interviewed separately while watching their own consultation on a digital video disk. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed. Results Forty women with ESBC and six physicians participated. Patients and physicians identified thirteen categories of physician facilitators of women’s involvement. Of these, seven categories were frequently identified by women: conveyed a rationale for patient involvement in TDM; explained the risk of cancer recurrence; explained treatment options; enhanced patient understanding of information; gave time for TDM; offered a treatment recommendation; and made women feel comfortable. Physicians described similar information‐giving facilitators but less often mentioned other facilitators. Few physician barriers to women’s involvement in TDM were identified. Conclusions Women with ESBC and cancer physicians shared some views of how physicians involve patients in TDM, although there were important differences. Physicians may underestimate the importance that women’s place on understanding the rationale for their involvement in TDM and on feeling comfortable during the consultation

Breast cancer · Cancer · Family medicine · Feeling · MEDLINE · Cancer survivorship and care · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Internal Medicine

  • Patients as team members

    Open Access•Martina Buljac‐Samardžić, Mark A Clark et al.•Health Expectations•2022

  • A qualitative study of rural women's views for the treatment of early breast cancer

    Open Access•Eli Ristevski, Melanie Regan et al.•Health Expectations•2015

  • Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine

    Open Access•Lesley Fallowfield, Valerie Jenkins•The Lancet•2004

  • Information Needs and Decisional Preferences in Women With Breast Cancer

    Lesley F Degner•JAMA•1997

  • Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions

    Dawn Stacey, France Légaré et al.•Cochrane Database of Systematic…•2017

  • Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making Commentary

    Open Access•A Towle, W Godolphin et al.•BMJ•1999

  • Whatever happened to qualitative description?

    Open Access•Margarete Sandelowski•Research in Nursing & Health•2000

  • Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?

    Michael D Cabana, Cynthia S Rand et al.•JAMA•1999

  • Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice

    Open Access•France Légaré, Stéphane Ratté et al.•Patient Education and Counseling•2008

  • Information and Participation Preferences Among Cancer Patients

    Open Access•Barrie R Cassileth, ROBERT V ZUPKIS et al.•Annals of Internal Medicine•1980

  • A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews

    Open Access•Hennie Boeije•Quality & Quantity•2002

  • The Discovery of Grounded Theory

    Barney G Glaser, Anselm L Strauss•Discovery of Grounded Theory•2017

  • The Option scale

    Open Access•Glyn Elwyn, Hayley Hutchings et al.•Health Expectations•2005

  • Fourth-Generation Evaluation

    Anne Neufeld, Alan Ryan et al.•Canadian Journal of Program…•1988

  • Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter

    Open Access•Cathy Charles, Amiram Gafni et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1999

  • Patient participation in decision-making

    Open Access•Edward Guadagnoli, Patricia Ward•Social Science & Medicine•1998

  • Involvement in treatment decision-making

    Open Access•Vikki Entwistle, Maria Prior et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2008

  • Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients

    Open Access•Christina G Blanchard, Mark S Labrecque et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1988

  • Sharing decisions in cancer care

    Open Access•Melina Gattellari, Phyllis Butow et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2001

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,18
Citation span2015 - 2022 (8)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae