Physician‐related facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making in early stage breast cancer
Perspectives of physicians and patients
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19508490 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mary Ann O’Brien (0000-0001-6093-1040, University of Toronto, corresponding author), Peter M Ellis (McMaster University), Timothy J Whelan (0000-0001-9844-2023, McMaster University), Cathy Charles (McMaster University), Amiram Gafni (0000-0001-8279-8172, McMaster University), Peter Lovrics (McMaster University), Som D Mukherjee (McMaster University), Nicole Hodgson (McMaster University) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 373-384 |
| Publication date | 2013-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00712.x |
| PMID | 21923813 |
| OpenAlex | W1501705820 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 41 |
Objective To identify patients’ and physicians’ perceptions of physician‐related verbal and nonverbal facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making (TDM) occurring during clinical encounters for women with early stage breast cancer (ESBC). Methods Eligible women were offered treatment options including surgery and adjuvant therapy. Eligible physicians provided care for women with ESBC in either a teaching hospital or an academic cancer centre. In Phase 1, women were interviewed 1–2 weeks after their initial consultation. In Phase 2, women and their physicians were interviewed separately while watching their own consultation on a digital video disk. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed. Results Forty women with ESBC and six physicians participated. Patients and physicians identified thirteen categories of physician facilitators of women’s involvement. Of these, seven categories were frequently identified by women: conveyed a rationale for patient involvement in TDM; explained the risk of cancer recurrence; explained treatment options; enhanced patient understanding of information; gave time for TDM; offered a treatment recommendation; and made women feel comfortable. Physicians described similar information‐giving facilitators but less often mentioned other facilitators. Few physician barriers to women’s involvement in TDM were identified. Conclusions Women with ESBC and cancer physicians shared some views of how physicians involve patients in TDM, although there were important differences. Physicians may underestimate the importance that women’s place on understanding the rationale for their involvement in TDM and on feeling comfortable during the consultation
Breast cancer · Cancer · Family medicine · Feeling · MEDLINE · Cancer survivorship and care · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Internal Medicine
Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine
Information Needs and Decisional Preferences in Women With Breast Cancer
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making Commentary
Whatever happened to qualitative description?
Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?
Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice
Information and Participation Preferences Among Cancer Patients
A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
The Option scale
Fourth-Generation Evaluation
Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter
Patient participation in decision-making
Involvement in treatment decision-making
Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients
Sharing decisions in cancer care
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,18 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2022 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |