Preliminary validation of the Satisfaction With Decision scale with depressed primary care patients
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19507674 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Celia E Wills (0000-0001-8548-1517, Michigan State University), Margaret Holmes‐Rovner (0000-0002-8725-7938, Michigan State University) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 149-159 |
| Publication date | 2003-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00220.x |
| PMID | 12752743 |
| OpenAlex | W1548744885 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 29 |
Objective To conduct a preliminary validation of the Satisfaction With Decision (SWD) scale with depressed primary care patients. Design Cross‐sectional observational pilot study using a postal survey. Setting and participants Depressed primary care patients ( n = 97) who recently had made a new decision about antidepressant medication use completed surveys regarding their treatment decisions. Main variables Measures included patient‐reported satisfaction with decision, decisional conflict, knowledge about depression and treatment, decision involvement, pain and health status, antidepressant medication efficacy, and satisfaction with health services. Results The SWD scale had good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.85). Evidence for construct validity was confirmed via a hypothesized pattern of relationships between the SWD scale and other measures. Decision satisfaction was associated with several issues of relevance for designing patient‐centred decision support interventions: (1) knowledge about depression and treatment; (2) involvement in health‐related decisions; and (3) aiding evaluation of trade‐offs among pros and cons of treatment. Conclusions The results of this pilot study show that the SWD scale appears to be a psychometrically sound and practical measure for research with this population. Additional research is needed on the theoretical nature of decision satisfaction and developing and testing patient‐centred decision support interventions for depression treatment
Alternative medicine · Construct validity · Data mining · Decision aids · Decision support system · Environmental health · Observational study · Patient satisfaction · Population · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Psychometrics · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology
Functioning and Well-being Outcomes of Patients With Depression Compared With Chronic General Medical Illnesses
Race, Gender, and Partnership in the Patient-Physician Relationship
Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale
Identification of patient attitudes and preferences regarding treatment of depression
The CES-D Scale
Patient and Visit Characteristics Related to Physicians??? Participatory Decision-Making Style
The Role of the Primary Care Physician in Patientsʼ Adherence to Antidepressant Therapy
The MOS Short-form General Health Survey
Healthy People 2000
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.19 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2021 (17) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |