Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reflection in practice

How can patient experience feedback trigger staff reflection in hospital acute care settings

Bibliographic Data

ID19508133
AuthorsJennifer Jones (0000-0003-1855-2674, Health Sciences department University of Leicester Leicester UK), Julian Bion (0000-0003-0344-5403, Intensive Care Medicine University of Birmingham Birmingham UK), Celia Brown (0000-0002-7526-0793, Warwick Medical School The University of Warwick Warwick UK), Janet Willars (0000-0002-7886-3223, Health Sciences department University of Leicester Leicester UK), Olivia Brookes (0000-0002-7944-4231, Research Development and Innovation University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK), Carolyn Tarrant (0000-0001-7356-5342, Health Sciences department University of Leicester Leicester UK, corresponding author), the PEARL collaboration
Year2020
Volume23
Issue2
Pages396-404
Publication date2020-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.13010
PMID31858677
OpenAlexW2995772962
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited29

BACKGROUND: Patient and staff experiences provide important insights into care quality, but health systems have difficulty using these data to improve care. Little attention has been paid to understanding how patient experience feedback can act as a prompt to reflection in practice in the clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the ways in which different types of patient experience feedback act as a trigger or prompt for engagement in reflection in clinical practice in acute hospital settings and identify important considerations for enhancing the value of patient experience data for reflective learning. METHODS: We conducted an ethnographic study in eight acute care units in three NHS hospital trusts in England, including 140 hours of observations and 45 semi-structured interviews with nursing, medical and managerial staff working in acute medical units and intensive care units. The data were analysed thematically. FINDINGS: We distinguished between formal patient experience data sources: data purposively collected and collated to capture the patient experience of care, generally at organizational level, including surveys, complaints and comments; and informal sources of feedback on the patient experience recognized by staff alongside the formal data. We also identified patient narratives as an 'in between' source of data. The impact of different types of patient feedback in triggering reflection primarily depended on the extent to which the feedback was experienced as personally relevant, meaningful and emotionally salient. DISCUSSION: Patient experience feedback is multi-faceted, but our study suggests that all types of feedback could be harnessed more effectively to prompt reflection

Acute care · Health care · Medical education · Narrative · Patient experience · Patient safety · Reflective Practice · Computer Science · Healthcare Quality and Management · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology

  • Staff feedback within an acute mental health hospital

    Open Access•Roy Deveau, Jill Bradshaw•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2025

  • Integrating Student Response Technology into a Large Undergraduate Course

    Open Access•Scott Matteson, Michael M Grant•TechTrends•2024

  • Continuums of Change in a Competence-Building Initiative Addressing End-of-Life Communication in Swedish Elder Care

    Open Access•Therese Johansson, Carol Tishelman et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2021

  • Reflective and reflexive research participants

    Open Access•Alexandria Innes•Methodological Innovations•2024

  • Communication and Persuasion

    Open Access•Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo•Communication and Persuasion•1986

  • Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education

    Open Access•Karen Mann, Jill Gordon et al.•Advances in Health Sciences…•2009

  • The use of reflection in medical education

    John Sandars•Medical Teacher•2009

  • The behaviour change wheel

    Open Access•Susan Michie, Maartje M Van Stralen et al.•Implementation Science•2011

  • Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research

    Jane Ritchie, Liz Spencer•Analyzing Qualitative Data•2010

  • The reflective practitioner

    Donald A Schon•The reflective practitioner•1991

  • The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion

    Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo•Communication and Persuasion•1986

  • The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement

    Open Access•Olga Boiko, John L Campbell et al.•Health Expectations•2015

  • What's the problem with patient experience feedback? A macro and micro understanding, based on findings from a three‐site UK qualitative study

    Open Access•Laura Sheard, Rosemary Peacock et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • The Patient Feedback Response Framework – Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback

    Open Access•Laura Sheard, Charles Marsh et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

  • Beyond metrics? Utilizing 'soft intelligence' for healthcare quality and safety

    Open Access•Graham P Martins, Graham P Martin et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2015

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,8
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae