An Application of Evidence‐Based Approaches to Engage Young People in the Design of a Global Mental Health Databank
Bibliographic Data
INTRODUCTION: Engaging youth in mental health research and intervention design has the potential to improve their relevance and effectiveness. Frameworks like Roger Hart's ladder of participation, Shier's pathways to participation and Lundy's voice and influence model aim to balance power between youth and adults. Hart's Ladder, specifically, is underutilized in global mental health research, presenting new opportunities to examine power dynamics across various contexts. Drawing on Hart's ladder, our study examined youth engagement in mental health research across high- and middle-income countries using Internet-based technologies, evaluating youth involvement in decision-making and presenting research stages that illustrate these engagements. METHODS: We conducted a directed content analysis of youth engagement in the study using primary data from project documents, weekly AirTable updates and discussions and interviews with youth and the research consortium. Using Hart's Ladder as a framework, we describe youth engagement along rungs throughout different research stages: cross-cutting research process, onboarding, formative research and quantitative and qualitative study designs. RESULTS: Youth engagement in the MindKind study fluctuated between Rung 4 ('Assign, but informed') and Rung 7 ('Youth initiated and directed') on Hart's Ladder. Engagement was minimal in the early project stages as project structures and goals were defined, with some youth feeling that their experiences were underutilized and many decisions being adult-led. Communication challenges and structural constraints, like tight timelines and limited budget, hindered youth engagement in highest ladder rungs. Despite these obstacles, youth engagement increased, particularly in developing recruitment strategies and in shaping data governance models and the qualitative study design. Youth helped refine research tools and protocols, resulting in moderate to substantial engagement in the later research stages. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the value of youth-adult partnerships, which offer promise in amplifying voices and nurturing skills, leadership and inclusiveness of young people. Youth engagement in project decision-making progressed from lower to higher rungs on Hart's Ladder over time; however, this was not linear. Effective youth engagement requires dynamic strategies, transparent communication and mutual respect, shaping outcomes that authentically reflect diverse perspectives and mental health experiences. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There was substantial patient and public involvement in this study. This paper reports findings on youth engagement conducted with 35 young people from India, South Africa and the United Kingdom, all of whom had lived experience of mental health challenges. Youth engagement in the MindKind study was coordinated and led by three professional youth advisors (PYAs) in these contexts, who were also young people with lived experience of mental health challenges. Each of the three study sites embedded a full-time, community-based PYA within their study team to inform all aspects of the research project, including the development of informational materials and the facilitation of Young People's Advisory Group (YPAG) sessions referenced in this paper. Each PYA also consulted with a site-specific YPAG that met bi-monthly throughout the project, shaping the formation of study materials and serving as a test group in both the quantitative and qualitative studies. Youth participants in this study also contributed extensively, engaging in data collection and manuscript writing. The following youth advisory panels members (J.B., L.B., D.O.J., M.V.) and all PYAs (E.B., S.R., R.S.) in the MindKind study contributed to the writing of this manuscript and are acknowledged as co-authors
Data science · Global mental health · Mental health · Psychiatry · Computer Science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology
Co-design of eHealth Interventions With Children and Young People
Research co-design in health
Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definitions and distinctions
Covid-19 mental health impact and responses in low-income and middle-income countries
Youth-Led Participatory Action Research
A collective autoethnography of coproduction in mental health research by academic researchers and young people in Brazil
Practitioner review
Stepping Back from ‘The Ladder’
Co-production
Engaging youth in research planning, design and execution
Mapping definitions of co‐production and co‐design in health and social care
Getting it right! Enhancing youth involvement in mental health research
A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research
Reflections, impact and recommendations of a co‐produced qualitative study with young people who have experience of mental health difficulties
Youth engagement in mental health research
Conceptualizing Youth Participation in Children’s Health Research
Remote data collection for public health research in a Covid-19 era
Youth-Adult Partnerships
A scoping review of the use of co‐design methods with culturally and linguistically diverse communities to improve or adapt mental health services
Re-conceptualising youth participation
Why not ask them? Mapping and promoting youth participation
Voice’ is not enough
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Pathways to participation
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Co-designing Services for Youth With Mental Health Issues
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |