Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The dynamic nature of patient engagement within a Canadian patient‐oriented kidney health research network

Perspectives of researchers and patient partners

Bibliographic Data

ID19509101
AuthorsMeghan J Elliott (0000-0002-5434-2917, Department of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada, corresponding author), Tamara L McCarron (0000-0001-7242-1910, Department of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada), Kara Schick‐makaroff (0000-0001-6200-3416, Faculty of Nursing University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada), Leah Getchell (CanSOLVE CKD Network Patient Partner Vancouver BC Canada), Braden Manns (0000-0002-8823-6127, Department of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada), Nicolás Fernández (0000-0002-3840-2641, CanSOLVE CKD Network Patient Partner Vancouver BC Canada)
Year2023
Volume26
Issue2
Pages905-918
Publication date2023-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.13716
PMID36704935
OpenAlexW4318263851
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited43

INTRODUCTION: Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD) is a pan-Canadian health research network that engages patients as partners across 18 unique projects and core infrastructure. In this qualitative study, we explored how research teams integrated patient partners into network research activities to inform our patient engagement approach. METHODS: To capture a breadth of perspectives, this qualitative descriptive study purposively sampled researchers and patient partners across 18 network research teams. We conducted 4 focus groups (2 patients and 2 researchers; n = 26) and 28 individual telephone interviews (n = 12 patient partners; n = 16 researchers). Transcripts were coded in duplicate, and themes were developed through an inductive, thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: We included 24 patient partners and 24 researchers from 17 of the 18 projects and all core committees within the network. Overarching concepts relate participants' initial impressions and uncertainty about patient engagement to an evolving appreciation of its value, impact and sustainability. We identified four themes with subthemes that characterized the dynamic nature of patient engagement and how participants integrated patients across network initiatives: (1) Reinforcing a shared purpose (learning together, collective commitment, evolving attitudes); (2) Fostering a culture of responsive and innovative research (accessible supports, strengthened process and product); (3) Aligning priorities, goals and needs (amenability to patient involvement, mutually productive relationships, harmonizing expectations); (4) Building a path to sustainability (value creation, capacity building, sustaining knowledge use). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the dynamic and adaptive processes related to patient engagement within a national, patient-oriented kidney health research network. Optimization of support structures and capacity are key factors to promote sustainability of engagement processes within and beyond the network. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This project was conceived in collaboration with a Can-SOLVE CKD patient partner (N. F.), with lived experience of kidney failure. He also co-designed the study's protocol, led focus groups and researcher interviews, and contributed to data analysis. L. G. has lived experience as a caregiver for a person with CKD and facilitated patient partner focus groups. The patient partners, both of whom are listed authors, provided important insights that shaped our interpretation and presentation of study findings

Health care · Knowledge management · Medical education · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · Sustainability · Thematic analysis · Computer Science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology

  • Building and Sustaining Patient Engagement Infrastructure Focused on Overdose Prevention Within a US Veterans Affairs National Research Network

    Open Access•Tracy L Sides, Malloree M Argust et al.•Health Expectations•2026

  • The dynamic nature of patient engagement within a Canadian patient‐oriented kidney health research network

    Open Access•Meghan J Elliott, Tamara L McCarron et al.•Health Expectations•2023

  • Evolving Roles for Patients as Partners in a National Kidney Health Research Network

    Open Access•Mark Melika‐Abusefien, Nicolás Fernández et al.•Health Expectations•2026

  • GRIPP2 reporting checklists

    Open Access•Sophie Staniszewska, Jo Brett et al.•Research Involvement and Engagement•2017

  • Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017

    Open Access•Boris Bikbov, Caroline Purcell et al.•The Lancet•2020

  • Whatever happened to qualitative description?

    Open Access•Margarete Sandelowski•Research in Nursing & Health•2000

  • GRIPP2 reporting checklists

    Open Access•Sophie Staniszewska, Jo Brett et al.•BMJ•2017

  • Chronic kidney disease

    Vivekanand Jha, Guillermo Garcia-Garcia et al.•The Lancet•2013

  • Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)

    A Jaure, A Tong et al.•International Journal for Quality…•2007

  • Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research

    Open Access•Trisha Greenhalgh, Lisa Hinton et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • The dynamic nature of patient engagement within a Canadian patient‐oriented kidney health research network

    Open Access•Meghan J Elliott, Tamara L McCarron et al.•Health Expectations•2023

  • “Part of the Team”

    Open Access•Svetlana Shklarov, Deborah A Marshall et al.•Health Expectations•2017

  • An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful patient engagement in research

    Open Access•Clayon B Hamilton, Alison M Hoens et al.•Health Expectations•2018

  • Preparing for patient partnership

    Open Access•Marissa Bird, Carley Ouellette et al.•Health Expectations•2020

  • Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research

    Open Access•Sophie Béland, Mireille Lambert et al.•Health Expectations•2022

  • Patient stakeholder engagement in research

    Open Access•Julia D Harrison, Andrew D Auerbach et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • Effective Engagement Requires Trust and Being Trustworthy

    Open Access•Consuelo H Wilkins•Medical Care•2018

  • Wabishki Bizhiko Skaanj

    Open Access•Helen Robinson-Settee, Craig Settee et al.•Canadian Journal of Public Health•2021

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae