Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is It Morally Permissible for Parents to Attempt to Convince Their Children of Their Comprehensive Views

Bibliographic Data

ID19525208
AuthorsSabine Hohl (0000-0002-0157-559X, University of Basel, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume30
Issue1
Pages54-73
Publication date2025-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1559-3061 • E-ISSN: 1559-3061
PublisherJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.26556/jesp.v30i1.3793
OpenAlexW4408723747
LanguageEN
References cited13

This paper claims that it is morally permissible for parents to attempt to convince their children of the correctness of their comprehensive views, provided that certain conditions be met. This position is a middle ground between contrasting views on this issue. On the one hand, common-sense conceptions of parenting consider it morally permissible for parents to impart their beliefs to their children. On the other hand, influential liberal accounts of parents’ rights like Matthew Clayton’s or Adam Swift’s deny this or allow it only with a caveat that I call the exclusion condition. The exclusion condition states that parents must exclude certain reasons from consideration when they decide whether to attempt to influence their children’s comprehensive views—namely, they are not morally permitted to consider the fact that they believe their own views to be correct. In response, I argue that the exclusion view is mistaken and that attempting to convince one’s children of one’s comprehensive views, because one believes them to be correct, can be compatible with respecting children’s independence. This is the case if certain process and background conditions are met. However, many of the practices of influencing children’s values that are considered permissible on the common-sense view are still morally impermissible on the account developed in this article

Criminology · Developmental psychology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Parental education and public reason

    Open Access•Johannes Giesinger•Theory and Research in Education•2013

  • Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality

    Open Access•Blain Neufeld, Chad Van Schoelandt•Law and Philosophy•2014

  • Justice and Legitimacy in Upbringing

    Matthew Clayton•JUSTICE AND LEGITIMACY IN…•2006

  • What Parents May Teach Their Children

    Andrew Franklin-Hall, Andrew Franklin‐Hall•Social Theory and Practice•2019

  • On the permissibility of shaping children’s values

    Andrée‐Anne Cormier, Andrée-Anne Cormier•Critical Review of International…•2017

  • Debate

    Open Access•Matthew Clayton•Journal of Political Philosophy•2011

  • Enabling children to learn from religions whilst respecting their rights

    Open Access•Anca Gheaus•Journal of Philosophy of Education•2024

  • Back toward a Comprehensive Liberalism

    Open Access•Ruth Abbey•Political Theory•2007

  • Child-rearing With Minimal Domination

    Open Access•Anca Gheaus•Political Studies•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae