Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the permissibility of shaping children’s values

Bibliographic Data

ID12609687
AuthorsAndrée‐Anne Cormier (0000-0001-6572-6935, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, corresponding author), Andrée-Anne Cormier (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)
Year2017
Volume21
Issue3
Pages333-350
Publication date2017-11-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-8230 • E-ISSN: 1743-8772
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13698230.2017.1398481
OpenAlexW2769185188
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited7

According to Harry Brighouse and Adam Swift, parents have a limited and conditional moral right to deliberately shape their children’s values and interests in light of their own particular comprehensive convictions. Their view contrasts with Matthew Clayton’s account of legitimate childrearing, according to which it is always impermissible for parents to seek to pass on their particular convictions to their children or, more generally, to ‘enroll’ them into their conception of the good, since this violates a requirement of respect for children’s independence. This paper offers a novel defense of Brighouse and Swift’s position that at least some forms of comprehensive enrollment are permissible. First, I argue that the claim that there is a duty to respect the independence of very young children is problematic. Then, drawing on Brighouse and Swift’s account of familial relationship goods, I argue that seeking to pass on comprehensive values or beliefs to one’s children is actually compatible with proper respect for their independence, as Clayton understands it

Duty · Economics · Independence (probability theory · Law and economics · Political science · Position (finance · Sociology · Swift · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Law · Mathematics · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • The Case for Restricted Perfectionism in Upbringing

    Chris Mills•Social Theory and Practice•2023

  • Independence for Children

    Matthew Clayton•Independence for Children•2025

  • Is It Morally Permissible for Parents to Attempt to Convince Their Children of Their Comprehensive Views

    Open Access•Sabine Hohl•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2025

  • Children, Partiality, and Equality

    Open Access•David O’brien, David P O''Brien•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2022

  • Politics by Other Means? Rawls, Feminists, Religious Conservatives, and Public Education

    Open Access•Paul J Casey•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2020

  • Multiculturalism as Harm Reduction

    Open Access•Daniel Weinstock•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2023

  • Children, Self‐knowledge and Cultural Reproduction

    Open Access•Eldar Sarajlić•Journal of Philosophy of Education•2019

  • Should Liberal States Subsidize Religious Schooling

    Open Access•Francois Boucher•Studies in Philosophy and Education•2018

  • Family Values

    Harry Brighouse, Adam Swift•Family Values•2014

  • Anti-perfectionist Childrearing

    Open Access•Matthew Clayton•Nature of Children's Well-Being•2015

  • Justice and Legitimacy in Upbringing

    Matthew Clayton•JUSTICE AND LEGITIMACY IN…•2006

  • Debate

    Open Access•Christina Cameron•Journal of Political Philosophy•2011

  • Debate

    Open Access•Matthew Clayton•Journal of Political Philosophy•2011

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae