Addressing social norms for adolescent timing and spacing of pregnancy in low and middle-income countries
Developing a global research agenda
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19552416 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jasmine Uysal (0000-0002-0425-3174, University of California San Diego), Anvita Dixit (0000-0002-6155-8628, University of Ottawa), Catherine Green (0000-0002-7068-7106, Georgetown University), Marilyn Akinola (University of California San Diego), Bryan Shaw (0000-0002-0832-5462, Georgetown University), Rebecka Lundgren (0000-0002-9607-5722, University of California San Diego) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Pages | 04206-04206 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Global Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2047-2978 • E-ISSN: 2047-2986 |
| Publisher | International Society of Global Health (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.7189/jogh.14.04206 |
| PMID | 39545342 |
| OpenAlex | W4404418076 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 29 |
Background: Social norms shape adolescent sexual and reproductive health behaviours contributing to contraceptive and pregnancy outcomes. No global research agendas exist to guide research on adolescent social norms shifting in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We developed a social norms research agenda to improve adolescent healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy in LMICs. Methods: We adapted and applied the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method. A group of researchers guided the process, and consulted with diverse experts to develop a list of 21 research questions for global stakeholders to score via an online survey. Survey participants scored each research question according to four criteria (fills key gap, feasible, impactful, equitable). Research priority scores (RPS) and average expert agreement (AEA) statistics were calculated for each question and analysed overall and by stakeholder region and profession. Results: We received 185 survey responses. Participants were, on average, 44 years old, 64% were women, 70% were from LMICs and 47% were implementers. The RPS ranged from 52 to 81% (74% median) and the AEA ranged from 49 to 70% (58% median). Nearly 70% of stakeholders gave the same score to each of the top five research questions. The top five research priorities focused on effective norm-shifting interventions (NSIs) strategies, processes and indicators to NSIs, and NSI adaptation and scale-up. Conclusions: Using a collaborative and rigorous process with diverse representation from LMICs and implementers, we reached consensus on five priority research questions to guide future adolescent social norms research to improve healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy in LMICs
Biology · Demographic economics · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Global health · Health care · Low and middle income countries · Low income · MEDLINE · Political science · Pregnancy · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Psychology
Setting Priorities in Global Child Health Research Investments
The Effect of Adolescent Pregnancy on Child Mortality in 46 Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Exploring adolescent engagement in sexual and reproductive health research in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda
Setting weights for fifteen CHNRI criteria at the global and regional level using public stakeholders
Setting health research priorities using the CHNRI method
Setting global research priorities for integrated community case management (iCCM)
Setting health research priorities using the CHNRI method
Theory and practice of social norms interventions
Social network and social normative characteristics of married female adolescents in Dosso, Niger
Understanding how social norms affect modern contraceptive use
Adolescent pregnancy and social norms in Zambia
Gender inequality, women's empowerment, and adolescent birth rates in 363 Latin American cities
Gender norms and social norms
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |