Schelling's Liberation of Reason from Itself
Response to Karen Ng and Markus Gabriel
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19553166 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Dews (University of Essex, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 615-636 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Hegel Bulletin (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2051-5367 • E-ISSN: 2051-5375 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/hgl.2024.18 |
| OpenAlex | W4396864236 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
It would be an honour for any author to receive two such thoughtful and detailed responses to their published work. I feel particularly grateful because one of my aspirations, in writing Schelling's Late Philosophy in Confrontation with Hegel , was to encourage a more in-depth discussion of the whole range of Schelling's thinking than has been common until now in the English-speaking world. In developing their critiques, both Karen Ng and Markus Gabriel provide informative accounts of some of Schelling's main concerns, helping to make clear his achievements as a thinker, and his status as a challenging interlocutor for philosophers sympathetic to one or another form of Hegelianism
Epistemology · Hegelianism · Honour · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and Historical Thought · Psychoanalysis and Social Critique · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |