Where Did Hegel Go Wrong on Race

Bibliographic Data

ID19553369
AuthorsMichael O Hardimon (0000-0002-9679-1374, University of San Diego, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume45
Issue1
Pages23-42
Publication date2024-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHegel Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2051-5367 • E-ISSN: 2051-5375
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/hgl.2024.5
OpenAlexW4392760735
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited20

Where exactly did Hegel go wrong on race? Moellendorf helpfully tells us that Hegel's treatment of race begins systematically in the Philosophy of Subjective Spirit and that he went wrong philosophically in the use of the biological category of race. This is basically correct but requires precisification. This article considers why Hegel's category of race is not unambiguously biological. Race's biological status can be problematized from the standpoint of contemporary biology and from the standpoint of Hegel's system. The textual placement of Hegel's systematic discussion of race in the philosophy of spirit makes clear that Hegel conceived of race in spiritual terms. Hegel took race to be a biospiritual category. Hegel was clearly committed to the now-controversial proposition that there is such a thing as human biological race, that there is a plurality of biological human races. He regarded race as a robust natural kind. His preferred list of races includes Caucasians, Negros, Mongolian, Malaysians and Americans. One noteworthy feature of his understanding of race's physical aspect was his focus on the formation of the skull and the face. At the same time, he clearly held that there were other deeper physical differences that accounted for the spiritual differences of race. Hegel was perfectly clear that race has a spiritual as well as physical aspect. He held that that the members of racial groups essentially shared certain fundamental, heritable, moral, intellectual and cultural characteristics with one another that they did not share with members of any other race and that these differences were such as to support an objective ranking. This shows that Hegel took the category of race to be the sort of category we today would characterize as ‘racialist’. Hegel's concept of race was the racialist concept of race

Epistemology · Hegelianism · Sociology · Gender Studies · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Race, Genetics, and Society

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access