Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Holistic impact assessment and cost savings of rainwater harvesting at the watershed scale

Bibliographic Data

ID19568584
AuthorsSantosh R Ghimire (0000-0001-7038-4167, Environmental Protection Agency), John M Johnston (0000-0002-5886-7876, Environmental Protection Agency)
EditorsMichael Chang (0000-0001-7705-497X)
Year2017
Volume5
Pages9-9
Publication date2017-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueElementa Science of the Anthropocene (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2325-1026 • E-ISSN: 2325-1026
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/elementa.135
PMID31321246
OpenAlexW2593875950
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited33

We evaluated the impacts of domestic and agricultural rainwater harvesting (RWH) systems in three watersheds within the Albemarle-Pamlico river basin (southeastern U.S.) using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost assessment. Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) categories included energy demand, fossil fuel, metals, ozone depletion, global warming, acidification, smog, blue and green water use, ecotoxicity, eutrophication, and human health effects. Building upon previous LCAs of near-optimal domestic and agricultural RWH systems in the region, we scaled functional unit LCIA scores for adoption rates of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% and compared these to conventional municipal water and well water systems. In addition to investigating watershed-scale impacts of RWH adoption, which few studies have addressed, potential life cycle cost savings due to reduced cumulative energy demand were scaled in each watershed for a more comprehensive analysis. The importance of managing the holistic water balance, including blue water (surface/ground water), green water (rainwater) use, and annual precipitation and their relationship to RWH are also addressed. RWH contributes to water resource sustainability by offsetting surface and ground water consumption and by reducing environmental and human health impacts compared to conventional sources. A watershed-wide RWH adoption rate of 25% has a number of ecological and human health benefits including blue water use reduction ranging from 2–39 Mm3, cumulative energy savings of 12–210 TJ, and reduced global warming potential of 600–10,100 Mg CO2 eq. Potential maximum lifetime energy cost savings were estimated at $5M and $24M corresponding to domestic RWH in Greens Mill and agricultural RWH in Back Creek watersheds

Eutrophication · Life-cycle assessment · Nutrient · Rainwater harvesting · Surface water · Water resource management · Watershed · Engineering · Environmental Science · Urban Stormwater Management Solutions · Wastewater Treatment and Reuse · Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies · Ecology · Environmental Engineering

  • The Life cycle Assessment Integrated with the Lexicographic Method for the Multi-Objective Optimization of Community-Based Rainwater Utilization

    Open Access•Yi Li, Wenjun Xu et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products

    Open Access•Mesfin M Mekonnen, Arjen Y Hoekstra•Hydrology and earth system sciences•2011

  • The water footprint of humanity

    Open Access•Arjen Y Hoekstra, Mesfin M Mekonnen•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • Water depletion

    Open Access•Kate A Brauman, Brian D Richter et al.•Elementa Science of the…•2016

  • Traci

    Open Access•Jane C Bare, Jane Bare•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2002

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae