Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cost-Effectiveness of Technology-Assisted Case Management in Low-Income, Rural Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

Bibliographic Data

ID19578499
AuthorsL E Egede (0000-0003-1546-1515, Medical College of Wisconsin, corresponding author), Clara E Dismuke (VA Palo Alto Health Care System), Rebekah J Walker (0000-0002-7773-557X, Medical College of Wisconsin), Joni S Williams (0000-0001-8988-3556, Medical College of Wisconsin), Christian Eiler (Medical College of Wisconsin)
Year2021
Volume5
Issue1
Pages503-511
Publication date2021-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Equity (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2473-1242 • E-ISSN: 2473-1242
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1089/heq.2020.0134
PMID34327293
OpenAlexW3185994016
LanguageEN
References cited44

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine whether delivering technology-assisted case management (TACM) with medication titration by nurses under physician supervision is cost effective compared with usual care (standard office procedures) in low-income rural adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods: One hundred and thirteen low-income, rural adults with type 2 diabetes and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥8%, were randomized to a TACM intervention or usual care. Effectiveness was measured as differences in HbA1c between the TACM and usual care groups at 6 months. Total cost per patient included intervention or usual care cost, medical care cost, and income loss associated with lost workdays. The total cost per patient and HbA1c were used to estimate a joint distribution of incremental cost and incremental effect of TACM compared with usual care. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated to summarize the cost-effectiveness of the TACM intervention relative to usual care to decrease HbA1c by 1%. Results: Costs due to intervention, primary care, other health care, emergency room visits, and workdays missed showed statistically significant differences between the groups (usual care $1,360.49 vs. TACM $5,379.60, p=0.004), with an absolute cost difference of $4,019.11. Based on the intervention cost per patient and the change in HbA1c, the median bootstrapped ICERs was estimated to be $6,299.04 (standard error=731.71) per 1% decrease in HbA1c. Conclusion: Based on these results, a 1% decrease in HbA1c can be obtained with the TACM intervention at an approximate cost of $6,300; therefore, it is a cost-effective option for treating vulnerable populations of adults with type 2 diabetes

Cost effectiveness · Diabetes management · Diabetes mellitus · Health care · Randomized controlled trial · Type 2 diabetes · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Diabetes Management and Education · Diabetes Management and Research · Medicine · Nursing · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine

  • Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35)

    Open Access•Irene Stratton, I M Stratton•BMJ•2000

  • Cost–effectiveness thresholds

    Open Access•Melanie Bertram, Jeremy A Lauer et al.•Bulletin of the World Health…•2016

  • Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017

    Open Access•American Diabetes Association•Diabetes Care•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae