Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Facilitators and barriers to community-led monitoring of health programs

Qualitative evidence from the global implementation landscape

Bibliographic Data

ID19591075
AuthorsAlana R Sharp (0009-0003-6737-6168, Georgetown University, corresponding author), Ngqabutho Mpofu (Right to Care, corresponding author), Elise Lankiewicz (American Foundation for AIDS Research, corresponding author), Beatrice Ajonye (International Community of Women Living with HIV, corresponding author), Ndivhuwo P Rambau, Ndivhuwo Rambau (Right to Care, corresponding author), Stefanie Dringus (0000-0003-1589-9250, Georgetown University, corresponding author), Brian Honermann (0000-0002-4907-0603, American Foundation for AIDS Research, corresponding author), Ngozi Erondu (0000-0003-0268-6838, Georgetown University, corresponding author), Asia Russell (Global Alzheimer's Platform Foundation, corresponding author), Kenneth Mwehonge (corresponding author), Cláudia Aguiar (Georgetown University, corresponding author), Naïké Ledan (Global Alzheimer's Platform Foundation, corresponding author), Matthew M Kavanagh (0000-0003-1751-4828, Georgetown University, corresponding author)
EditorsSanjana J Ravi
Year2024
Volume4
Issue6
Pagese0003293
Publication date2024-06-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0003293
PMID38900725
OpenAlexW4399850167
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited10

Achieving the global HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria targets will require innovative strategies to deliver high quality and person-centered health services. Community-led monitoring (CLM) is a rapidly proliferating health systems strengthening intervention for improving healthcare services and documenting human rights violations, through social empowerment and political accountability. Driven in part by increasing financial support from donors, a growing number of countries are implementing CLM programs. This study aimed to identify early challenges and lessons learned from CLM implementation, with the aim of informing and improving the implementation of CLM programs and ultimately achieving greater impact on the delivery of services. Twenty-five CLM implementors representing 21 countries participated in an interview. Early generation of buy-in from diverse stakeholders was noted as critical for CLM success. Leveraging existing networks of service users and community organizations to implement CLM also helped to maximize program reach and resources. Uncertainty around CLM’s purpose and roles among CLM stakeholders resulted in challenges to community leadership and ownership of programs. Respondents also described challenges with underfunded programs, especially advocacy components, and inflexible donor funding mechanisms. Critical capacity gaps remain around advocacy and electronic data collection and use. With the rapid expansion of CLM, this study serves as an important first step in characterizing challenges and successes in the CLM landscape. Successful implementation of CLM requires prioritizing community ownership and leadership, donor commitment to sustainable and reliable funding, and strengthened support of programs across the data collection and advocacy lifecycle

Accountability · Business · Community engagement · Empowerment · Environmental resource management · Health care · Human services · Political science · Public relations · Service delivery framework · Global Maternal and Child Health · Health Policy Implementation Science · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Marketing

  • Who do the data serve? Critical reflections on program monitoring during the war in Ukraine

    Open Access•Lisa Lazarus, Leigh M McClarty et al.•Global Public Health•2026

  • Cognitive sovereignty and decolonial public health

    Open Access•Samuel Kakraba, Edmund Fosu Agyemang et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Widgets or Watchdogs?

    Anuradha Joshi, Peter P Houtzager•Public Management Review•2012

  • Health provider responsiveness to social accountability initiatives in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Elsbet Lodenstein, Marjolein Dieleman et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2017

  • Social Accountability

    Open Access•Jonathan Fox, Jonathan A Fox•World Development•2015

  • What is a public health observatory

    J Hemmings, J Wilkinson•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2003

  • Gauging the Effects of Social Accountability on Services, Governance, and Citizen Empowerment

    Open Access•Derick W Brinkerhoff, Anna Wetterberg•Public Administration Review•2015

  • Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry

    John W Creswell, Dana L Miller•Theory Into Practice•2000

  • Thematic Analysis

    Open Access•Lorelli Nowell, Jill M Norris et al.•International Journal of…•2017

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae