Community efficacy for non-communicable disease management (Coen)

Conceptualization and measurement

Bibliographic Data

ID19591382
AuthorsShangzhi Xiong (0000-0002-5580-8686, UNSW Sydney, corresponding author), Gangjiao Zhu (0000-0001-9297-2154, Wuhan University, corresponding author), Rajeev Malhotra (0000-0002-9978-4276, SingHealth, corresponding author), Xinyue Chen (0000-0003-2181-5172, Johns Hopkins University, corresponding author), Enying Gong (0000-0003-2203-0369, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, corresponding author), Zhan Wang (0000-0002-1335-4698, Purdue University West Lafayette, corresponding author), Jian’An Zhang (corresponding author), Weixia Peng (0000-0002-3643-5466, Fudan University, corresponding author), Shiwei Wang (0009-0003-9492-9637, Duke Kunshan University, corresponding author), Xurui Jin (0000-0002-8111-109X, corresponding author), Nicholas Peoples (0000-0002-5454-9627, Baylor College of Medicine, corresponding author), Truls Østbye (0000-0002-0662-7440, Duke University, corresponding author), Maoyi Tian (0000-0002-5660-8571, Harbin Medical University, corresponding author), Lijing L Yan (0000-0002-3029-0462, Northwestern University, corresponding author)
EditorsTasleem Ras (0000-0001-5411-9363)
Year2024
Volume4
Issue8
Pagese0003549
Publication date2024-08-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0003549
PMID39141640
OpenAlexW4401568260
LanguageEN
References cited18

The importance of community-based non-communicable disease (NCD) management has been internationally recognized. However, currently, no instrument is available to evaluate a community’s ability to provide NCD management for its residents. This study defined such an ability as “Community Efficacy for NCD Management” (COEN), and aimed to conceptualize, develop and validate a scale to measure COEN. We first conducted literature review, expert interviews, and Delphi panels to conceptualize COEN and select scale items. Then, we conducted two rounds of community surveys and interviews to validate the COEN scale among local residents in three cities in China. We used Cronbach’s alpha to test the scale’s internal consistency, Kappa test for test-retest reliability, and exploratory factor analysis for structural validity. COEN was conceptualized as “the ability of a community to provide NCD management for its residents, reflected by its natural environment, social relationships, community resources, health services, and resident-engaging activities.” The first community research among 345 residents yielded a 38-item COEN scale with high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86) and acceptable test-retest reliability (Kappa value >0.2). The second community research tested a shortened COEN scale among 657 residents, yielding a final COEN scale with 14 items from five factors: community management (n = 3), social relationships (n = 4), resource accessibility (n = 3), community health services (n = 2), and resident engagement (n = 2), with an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.79. COEN is a meaningful concept in contextualizing and evaluating NCD management anchored in the community, and the COEN scale is a multi-domain reliable tool to quantify COEN, which can be used to guide future related research and practice in public health

Cartography · Community health · Cronbach's alpha · Operationalization · Psychometrics · Public health · Clinical Psychology · Community Health and Development · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access