Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessment of scattered and leakage radiation from ultra-portable X-ray systems in chest imaging

An independent study

Bibliographic Data

ID19594076
AuthorsLeonie E Paulis (0009-0000-1678-6827, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Roald S Schnerr (0000-0001-8155-7115, Maastricht University, corresponding author), Jarred Halton (Médecins Sans Frontières, corresponding author), Zhi Zhen Qin (0000-0002-3956-5223, corresponding author), Arlene Chua (0000-0001-6428-9083, Médecins Sans Frontières, corresponding author)
EditorsDevan Jaganath (0000-0002-8555-5667)
Year2025
Volume5
Issue1
Pagese0003986
Publication date2025-01-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0003986
PMID39854582
OpenAlexW4406785995
LanguageEN
References cited10

Ultraportable (UP) X-ray devices are ideal to use in community-based settings, particularly for chest X-ray (CXR) screening of tuberculosis (TB). Unfortunately, there is insufficient guidance on the radiation safety of these devices. This study aims to determine the radiation dose by UP X-ray devices to both the public and radiographers compared to international dose limits. Radiation dose measurements were performed with four UP X-ray devices that met international criteria, utilizing a clinically representative CXR set-up made with a thorax phantom. Scatter and leakage radiation dose were measured at various positions surrounding the phantom and X-ray tube, respectively. These measurements were used to calculate yearly radiation doses for different scenarios based on the median of all UP X-ray devices. From the yearly scatter doses, the minimum distances from the phantom needed to stay below the international public dose limit (1 mSv/year) were calculated. This distance was longest in the direction back towards the X-ray tube and shortest to the left/right sides of the phantom, e.g., 4.5 m and 2.5 m resp. when performing 50 exams/day, at 90 kV, 2.5 mAs and source skin distance (SSD) 1 m. Additional calculations including leakage radiation were conducted at a typical radiographer position (i.e., behind the X-ray tube), with a correction factor for wearing a lead apron. At 2 m behind the X-ray tube, a radiographer wearing a lead apron could perform 106 exams/day at 2.5 mAs and 29 exams/day at 10 mAs (90 kV, SSD 1 m), while keeping his/her radiation dose below the public dose limit (1 mSv/year) and well below the radiographer dose limit (20 mSv/year). In most CXR screening scenarios, the radiation dose of UP X-ray devices can be kept below 1 mSv/year by employing basic radiation safety rules on time, distance and shielding and using appropriate CXR exposure parameters

Effective dose (radiation) · Imaging phantom · Medical physics · Nuclear medicine · Optics · Physics · Radiation dose · Radiation exposure · Radiation protection · X-ray · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Medicine · Radiation Dose and Imaging · Radiation

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae