After the ‘APIcalypse’
Social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19601475 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Axel Bruns (0000-0002-3943-133X, Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 1544-1566 |
| Publication date | 2019-07-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Information Communication & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-118X • E-ISSN: 1468-4462 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1369118x.2019.1637447 |
| OpenAlex | W2956617434 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 168 |
| References cited | 22 |
In the aftermath of the Cambridge Analytica controversy, social media platform providers such as Facebook and Twitter have severely restricted access to platform data via their Application Programming Interfaces (APIs). This has had a particularly critical effect on the ability of social media researchers to investigate phenomena such as abuse, hate speech, trolling, and disinformation campaigns, and to hold the platforms to account for the role that their affordances and policies might play in facilitating such dysfunction. Alternative data access frameworks, such as Facebook’s partnership with the controversial Social Science One initiative, represent an insufficient replacement for fully functional APIs, and the platform providers’ actions in responding to the Cambridge Analytica scandal raise suspicions that they have instrumentalised it to actively frustrate critical, independent, public interest scrutiny by scholars. Building on a critical review of Facebook’s public statements through its own platforms and the mainstream media, and of the scholarly responses these have drawn, this article outlines the societal implications of the ‘APIcalypse’, and reviews potential options for scholars in responding to it
Affordance · Disinformation · General partnership · Internet privacy · Mainstream · Political science · Public relations · Scholarship · Scrutiny · Social media · Sociology · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media and Politics
Guiding Methodological Choices in Digital Ethnography
Verstrickt in der Rhetorik der Technologie-, Daten- und Medienunternehmen? Zu Problematiken im Umgang mit nicht-wissenschaftlichen Nutzungsdaten
The Digital Media-use Effects (d-MUsE) Model
Cartografía de Investigación sobre Misoginia Online y Manosfera en España
Practical AI Transparency
Exploring feminisms on Instagram
The contingent macro
Data Perversion
Para além dos dados coletados
Beyond time delays
Deplatforming, demotion and folk theories of Big Tech persecution
Mapping YouTube
When URLs on social networks become invisible
Managing unpleasant moods
Tipos de big data y análisis sociológico
Exploring Time-Coded Comments on YouTube Music Videos of ‘Top 40’ Pop 2000–20
The Platformisation of Consumer Culture
Social Media and Democracy
The Pushshift Reddit Dataset
Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Social Media and the Smart City
Mapping Exposure Diversity
Modeling news recommender systems’ conditional effects on selective exposure
El 14F a Instagram. Una proposta d'articulació de tècniques de raspat web i anàlisi de xarxes
Methods for datafication, datafication of methods
Beyond engagement
Envisioning a More Inclusive Future for Digital Journalism
Twitter and feminist commemoration of the 1916 Easter Rising
“Hands On”
La campagna per il Referendum Costituzionale 2020 e la comunicazione antipopulista su Facebook
Cancel culture
Observing “tuned” advertising on digital platforms
Monitoring infrastructural power
Digital Cultures of Care, Safety and Wellbeing
The Evolution of Facebook's Graph Api
Platformizing Knowledge
Wer ist #MeToo? Eine netzwerkanalytische Untersuchung (anti-)feministischen Protests auf Twitter
Forschungsinfrastrukturen für die Kommunikations- und Medienforschung im deutschsprachigen Raum. Initiativen, Bedarfe und Perspektiven
Model-X knockoffs in the replication crisis era
Impact of hate speech in digital media on pre-election public opinion
Real-Time Text Classification of User-Generated Content on Social Media
Towards platform observability
The Democratic Significance of Everyday News Use
Digitality and the African Photographic Archive
De la capture à l’asservissement
Australia's News Media Bargaining Code and the global turn towards platform regulation
Key Concepts and Research Methods to Analyze TikTok Journalism
Citizen-produced political text
Between rules, norms and shared understandings
Evaluating universities' strategic online communication
From tool to tool-making
Conspiracy theories in digital environments
Between Innovation and Standardization
Rethinking Scaling Up Content Analysis
Public opinion polarization on immigration in Italy
Harnessing Big Data, Hindered by Bias
Do Commercial Place Managers Explain Crime Across Places? Yes and NO(PE)
Hashtags as attention seeking in a global event
Mapping urban linguistic diversity with social media and population register data
The Highs in Communication Research
Computational Methods for Improving the Observability of Platform-Based Advertising
Sampling Twitter users for social science research
Using Data Bricolage and Mixed-Methods GIS to Uncover Mental Health Service Gaps in Rural Australia
The Impact of TikTok on Elections
How Brand Managers Can Maximize Engagement with ASMR YouTube Content
Decolonising Digital Media Research Methods
Follow the Data! A Strategy for Tracing Infrastructural Power
The Challenges of Replicating Volatile Platform-Data Studies
Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science
TubeStats and TokStats
Seeing like an API
The Watchdogs Network
Dead-and-dying platforms
Collecting migrants' Facebook posts
To scrape or not to scrape, this is dilemma. The post-API scenario and implications on digital research
Propagation of Hate Speech on Social Network X
Advocating for Platform Data Access
Affordances-driven ethics for research on mobile instant messaging
Correcting Sample Selection Bias of Historical Digital Trace Data
Leveraging Data Donations for Communication Research
Amplifying the News
I hope, one day, I will have the right to speak
Scandinavian Hyperpartisans Prevail? News Use on Facebook During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Hashtagging depression on Instagram
Ethical conundrums
Platform enclosure of human behavior and its measurement
From archive cultures to ephemeral content, and back
The rise of Instagram as a tool for political communication
Picture-perfect populism
Social media data archives in an API-driven world
Wrap your head around it
Digital methods in a post-API environment
The Social Life of the Women, Peace and Security Agenda
Representing Marichuy Online
A Match Made in Language
Social Media Listening Platforms in Wartime Russia
Asking for Traces
Take Action Now! A Longitudinal Study of Political Party Calls to Action Across Social Media Platforms
Conceptualizing, Assessing, and Improving the Quality of Digital Behavioral Data
A topology of Twitter research
Studying Facebook via data extraction
Programmed method
Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks
Studying Facebook and Instagram data
Social Media Research
Junking Science to Promote Tobacco
Computational Research in the Post-API Age
A New Model for Industry–Academic Partnerships
Fossil fuel emitters and climate change
Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research
| Unique citing works | 168 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 24 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | Yes |
| Citation types | Neutral: 153 |