Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Platformizing Knowledge

Mess and Meaning in Web 3.0 Infrastructures

Bibliographic Data

ID22008906
AuthorsAndrew Iliadis (0000-0002-8345-6251, Temple College), W J Stevens (Temple College), Wesley Stevens, Jean-Christophe Plantin (0000-0001-8041-6679, London School of Economics and Political Science), Amelia Acker (0000-0001-5332-0487, The University of Texas at Austin), Huw Davies (0000-0002-2653-3695), Huw C Davies (0000-0002-2659-1465, University of Edinburgh), Rebecca Eynon (0000-0002-2074-5486, University of Oxford)
Year2020
Publication date2020-10-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2162-3317 • E-ISSN: 2162-3317
PublisherUniversity of Illinois Libraries (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11128
OpenAlexW3092244450
LanguageEN
References cited45

This panel focuses on the way that platforms have become key players in the representation of knowledge. Recently, there have been calls to combine infrastructure and platform-based frameworks to understand the nature of information exchange on the web through digital tools for knowledge sharing. The present panel builds and extends work on platform and infrastructure studies in what has been referred to as “knowledge as programmable object” (Plantin, et al., 2018), specifically focusing on how metadata and semantic information are shaped and exchanged in specific web contexts. As Bucher (2012; 2013) and Helmond (2015) show, data portability in the context of web platforms requires a certain level of semantic annotation. Semantic interoperability is the defining feature of so-called "Web 3.0"—traditionally referred to as the semantic web (Antoniou et al, 2012; Szeredi et al, 2014). Since its inception, the semantic web has privileged the status of metadata for providing the fine-grained levels of contextual expressivity needed for machine-readable web data, and can be found in products as diverse as Google's Knowledge Graph, online research repositories like Figshare, and other sources that engage in platformizing knowledge. The first paper in this panel examines the international Schema.org collaboration. The second paper investigates the epistemological implications when platforms organize data sharing. The third paper argues for the use of patents to inform research methodologies for understanding knowledge graphs. The fourth paper discusses private platforms’ extraction and collection of user metadata and the enclosure of data access

Data science · Data Web · Interoperability · Knowledge management · Knowledge sharing · Linked Data · Metadata · Semantic analytics · Semantic Web · Semantic Web Stack · Social Semantic Web · Software portability · Web service · Web standards · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Data Quality and Management · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services

  • Data-Centric Biology

    Sabina Leonelli•Data-Centric Biology•2016

  • Open Standards and the Digital Age

    Open Access•Andrew L Russell•Open Standards and the Digital Age•2014

  • Data Sharing by Scientists

    Open Access•Carol Tenopir, Suzanne Allard et al.•PLoS ONE•2011

  • Programmed method

    Open Access•Erik Borra, Bernhard Rieder et al.•Aslib Journal of Information…•2014

  • The Affordances of Social Media Platforms

    Taina Bucher, Anne Helmond•The Sage Handbook of Social Media•2018

  • Knowledge Infrastructures

    Open Access•Helena Karasti, Florence Millerand et al.•Science & Technology Studies•2016

  • Theorizing Web 2.0

    Felicia Wu Song•Information Communication & Society•2010

  • The Participatory Web

    Grant Blank, Bianca C Reisdorf•Information Communication & Society•2012

  • Data craft

    Amelia Acker, Joan Donovan•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • Toward Information Infrastructure Studies

    G C Bowker, Karen S Baker et al.•The international handbook of…•2009

  • The Stuff of Bits

    Paul Dourish•Stuff of Bits•2017

  • Software Studies

    Matthew Fuller•Software Studies•2008

  • Code/Space

    Open Access•Rob Kitchin, Martin Dodge•Code/Space•2011

  • After the ‘APIcalypse’

    Axel Bruns•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • The Semantic Web and Its Entanglements

    Open Access•Matthew T McCarthy•Science Technology and Society•2017

  • Why media companies insist they're not media companies, why they're wrong, and why it matters

    Open Access•Philip M Napoli, Philip Napoli et al.•First Monday•2017

  • Critiques on the Participatory Potentials of Web 2.0

    Open Access•Bart Cammaerts•Communication Culture and Critique•2008

  • Algorithms, ontology, and social progress

    Open Access•Andrew Iliadis•Global Media and Communication•2018

  • Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook

    Open Access•Jean-Christophe Plantin, Carl Lagoze et al.•New Media & Society•2016

  • The emergence of network media logic in political communication

    Open Access•Ulrike Klinger, J Svensson•New Media & Society•2014

  • Renvois of the past, present and future

    Open Access•Michael Zimmer•New Media & Society•2009

  • Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook

    Open Access•Taina Bucher•New Media & Society•2012

  • The archive and the processor

    Open Access•Robert W Gehl•New Media & Society•2011

  • Social media data archives in an API-driven world

    Open Access•Amelia Acker, Adam Kreisberg•Archival Science•2019

  • Science friction

    Open Access•P Edwards, Paul N Edwards et al.•Social Studies of Science•2011

  • When information wanted to be free

    Eran Fisher•The Information Society•2018

  • The Cultural Logic of Media Convergence

    Open Access•H Jenkins•International Journal of Cultural…•2004

  • Automating Inequality

    Hannah Lebovits•Public Integrity•2019

  • The politics of 'platforms

    Open Access•Tarleton Gillespie•New Media & Society•2010

  • Understanding Social Media Logic

    Open Access•José Van Dijck, Thomas Poell•2013

  • Mining One Percent of Twitter

    Open Access•Carolin Gerlitz, Bernhard Rieder•M/C Journal•2013

  • Critical Questions for Big Data

    Drick Boyd, Danah Boyd et al.•Information Communication & Society•2012

  • Re-integrating scholarly infrastructure

    Open Access•Jean-Christophe Plantin, Carl Lagoze et al.•Big Data & Society•2018

  • Data journeys

    Open Access•Jo Bates, Yu-Wei Lin et al.•Big Data & Society•2016

  • Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession

    Open Access•Jim Thatcher, David O’sullivan et al.•Environment and Planning D…•2016

  • Provenance, power and place

    Open Access•Harry Ford, Heather Ford et al.•Environment and Planning D…•2016

  • The Ethnography of Infrastructure

    Open Access•Susan Leigh Star•American Behavioral Scientist•1999

  • Social Media and the 'Read-Only' Web

    Open Access•Megan Sapnar Ankerson•Social Media + Society•2015

  • The Platformization of the Web

    Open Access•Anne Helmond•Social Media + Society•2015

  • Social Media

    Open Access•Drick Boyd, Danah Boyd•Social Media + Society•2015

  • The Mobilisation of AI in Education

    Open Access•Huw C Davies, Rebecca Eynon et al.•Sociology•2021

  • Digital Futures? Sociological Challenges and Opportunities in the Emergent Semantic Web

    Open Access•Halford, Susan Halford et al.•Sociology•2013

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae