Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Consulting citizens

Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics

Bibliographic Data

ID19609792
AuthorsJavier Lezaun (0000-0002-5483-3628, Cornell University, corresponding author), Linda Soneryd
Year2007
Volume16
Issue3
Pages279-297
Publication date2007-06-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Understanding of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0963-6625 • E-ISSN: 1361-6609
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0963662507079371
OpenAlexW2086152159
LanguageEN
Citations received192
References cited13

The new centrality of “the public” to the governance of science and technology has been accompanied by a widespread use of public consultation mechanisms designed to elicit from citizens relevant opinions on technoscientific matters. This paper explores the configuration of legitimate constituencies in two such exercises: the UK “ GM Nation?” public debate on food biotechnology, and a Swedish “Transparency Forum” on the risks of mobile telephones. We consider the apparently paradoxical combination in these two examples of a tendency to produce static images of the public with a high valuation of mobility—of citizens and their opinions—as the key outcome of deliberation. We discuss the organizers' careful delineation of a distinction between “stakeholders” and the “general public,” and their aversion to any sort of “eventfulness” in public deliberations. Finally, we introduce the classical notion of the “idiot”—the individual who minds exclusively his or her own private affairs— and argue for the need to develop a new vocabulary to evaluate the politics of “listening to the public.”

Business · Centrality · Corporate governance · Deliberation · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Publics · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law

  • Democratic Situations

    Open Access•A Barry, A Kuntsman et al.•Democratic Situations•2022

  • Public Trust, Deliberative Engagement and Health Data Projects

    Open Access•N Bharti, Cian O’donovan et al.•Engaging Science Technology and…•2021

  • Democratizando a ciência no cenário internacional

    Open Access•Nicole Aguilar Gayard•Liinc em Revista•2017

  • Democratizing participation through feminism. The role of feminist subaltern counterpublics in the expansion of the Basque public sphere

    Open Access•Joseph M Palacios•Revista Española de Ciencia…•2017

  • Mobilisation for public engagement

    Open Access•Marta Entradas, Martin M Bauer•Public Understanding of Science•2017

  • Marketing practices and the reconfiguration of public action

    Clive Barnett, Nick Mahony•Policy & Politics•2016

  • Experimentando con la tierra. Geotermia, no-conocimiento y transiciones energéticas como experimentos a la intemperie

    Open Access•M Gro, M Tironi•Revista Internacional de Sociología•2017

  • United Kingdom

    Melanie Smallman, Simon J Lock et al.•Communicating Science•2020

  • Science Communication

    Open Access•Jane Gregory•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • How Citizens View Science Communication

    Open Access•Carolina Moreno-Castro, Aneta Krzewińska et al.•How Citizens View Science…•2024

  • Inventing the Social

    Open Access•Nerea Calvillo, Bernd Kräftner et al.•Inventing the Social•2018

  • Governing Failure - Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance

    Open Access•Jacqueline Best•Governing Failure•2014

  • Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy

    Open Access•Nick Pidgeon, Nick F Pidgeon et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2014

  • The Future of Science Governance

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten, Jason Chilvers•Environment and Planning C…•2014

  • Testing future societies? Developing a framework for test beds and living labs as instruments of innovation governance

    Open Access•Franziska Engels, Alexander Wentland et al.•Research Policy•2019

  • Stigma as evidence

    Open Access•Aileen Christianson•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2026

  • The emergence of citizen panels as a de facto standard

    Open Access•Nina Amelung•Quaderni•2012

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Jan-Peter Voß, Richard Freeman•Knowing Governance•2016

  • Une idée sur le déclin ?

    Open Access•Luigi Pellizzoni, Laurent Vannini•Participations•2013

  • Percepciones de los ciudadanos catalanes acerca de la participación del público y los expertos en las controversias sobre el agua

    Open Access•J C Aceros, Francisco Tirado et al.•Papers Revista de Sociologia•2011

  • Science, technology, and life politics beyond the market

    Open Access•Charles Thorpe•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2020

  • Kształt powietrza

    Open Access•Seweryn Rudnicki•Studia Socjologiczne•2023

  • E-consultation and the quest for inclusive governance in Nigeria

    Open Access•Samuel Oni, Aderonke A Oni et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2020

  • Soil publics

    Open Access•Hannah Louise Price, Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro et al.•Local Environment•2024

  • Creating ‘Local Publics’

    Open Access•Udo Pesch, Nicole Huijts et al.•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

  • A Framework for Ethical Research and Innovation

    Open Access•Harold Paredes-Frigolett, Alan E Singer et al.•Science and Engineering Ethics•2021

  • Should I trust or should I go? How people perceive and assess the quality of science communication to avoid fake news

    Open Access•Andrea Rubin, Sonia Brondi et al.•Quality & Quantity•2023

  • Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations

    Open Access•Andrew S Balmer, Andrew Balmer et al.•Science & Technology Studies•2015

  • Knowing and Loving

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies•Science & Technology Studies•2014

  • Love and Fear

    Open Access•Lisa Lindén•Science & Technology Studies•2020

  • Lost in Translation

    Open Access•Zdeněk Konopásek, Linda Soneryd et al.•Science & Technology Studies•2017

  • Intervention by Invitation

    Open Access•Torben Elgaard Jensen•Science & Technology Studies•2012

  • Mapping Case Studies of Public Engagement and Participation in Science and Technology

    Open Access•Paulo De Loureiro, Helena Horta et al.•Science & Technology Studies•2021

  • Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK

    Open Access•Julie Barnett, Kate Burningham et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2010

  • The public's knowledge of mobile communication and its influence on base station siting preferences

    Marie-Eve Cousin, Marie‐Eve Cousin et al.•Health Risk & Society•2010

  • Smart meters and public acceptance

    David J He, David J Hess•Health Risk & Society•2014

  • Public and Stakeholder Engagement in Developing Human Heritable Genome Editing Policies

    Open Access•Ana S Iltis, Sarah Hoover et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2021

  • Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers, Helen Pallett et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • A very public mess

    Open Access•Sebastián Ureta•Energy Research & Social Science•2017

  • Appraising sociotechnical visions of sustainable energy futures

    Open Access•Rob Bellamy, Jason Chilvers et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Citizens in Distress

    Open Access•Mikko Värttö•Social Inclusion•2025

  • Following from the front

    Alfred Moore•Critical Policy Studies•2012

  • Engaging Narratives and the Limits of Lay Ethics

    Open Access•Alfred Nordmann, Phil Macnaghten•NanoEthics•2010

  • Community Engagement to Facilitate, Legitimize and Accelerate the Advancement of Nanotechnologies in Australia

    Open Access•Kristen Lyons, James Whelan•NanoEthics•2009

  • The Evolution of ‘Public Understanding of Science’

    Open Access•Jane Gregory, Simon J Lock•Sociology Compass•2008

  • The circulation of knowledge beyond the academia

    Open Access•Leandro Rodriguez Medina•Sociology Compass•2023

  • From the arcane to the mundane

    Open Access•Alexandra Soulier, Samantha Leonard et al.•New Genetics and Society•2016

  • Streitkultur and the governance of genetic testing and insurance in Germany

    Open Access•Jonas Lander, Ine Van Hoyweghen et al.•New Genetics and Society•2014

  • Questionable devices

    Open Access•L Waller, David Moats et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

  • The concept of instrument constituencies

    Open Access•Arno Simons, Jan-Peter Voß•Policy and Society•2017

  • From risk to the government of uncertainty

    Olivier Borraz•Journal of Risk Research•2011

  • Taming uncertainty

    Gerard de Vries, Imrat Verhoeven et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2011

  • Real without being concrete’

    John Fellenor, Julie Barnett et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2018

  • Domesticating participation

    Henry Rothstein•Journal of Risk Research•2013

  • Engaging publics about environmental and technology risks

    Nick Pidgeon, Nick F Pidgeon•Journal of Risk Research•2020

  • On a Governmentality Analytics of the ‘Deliberative Turn’

    Kathryn Hobson•Space and Polity•2009

  • Performative policy studies

    Jan-Peter Voß•Innovation The European Journal…•2014

  • Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology

    Open Access•Lotte Krabbenborg, Henk A J Mulder et al.•Science Communication•2015

  • Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers•Science Communication•2012

  • Public relations

    Open Access•Linda Monsees•Security Dialogue•2019

  • Natural variability or climate change? Stakeholder and citizen perceptions of extreme event attribution

    Open Access•Shannon Osaka, Rob Bellamy•Global Environmental Change•2020

  • Living the global social experiment

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten, Bronislaw Szerszynski•Global Environmental Change•2013

  • Psychology and its publics

    Open Access•Mark Pettit, J L Young•History of the Human Sciences•2017

  • Publics and Populations

    Amy Hinterberger•Science as Culture•2012

  • Slim Futures and the Fat Pill

    U Felt, Maximilian Fochler•Science as Culture•2011

  • The Contested Publics of the UK GM Controversy

    Larry Reynolds, Larry A Reynolds•Science as Culture•2013

  • Publics of Bioscience

    Maureen Mcneil, Joan Haran•Science as Culture•2013

  • Doing Dialogue

    Sarah R Davies•Science as Culture•2009

  • From Publics to Practitioners

    Dimitris Papadopoulos•Science as Culture•2014

  • Imagining Ordinary Citizens? Conceptualized and Actual Participants for Deliberations on Emerging Technologies

    Maria Powell, Mathilde Colin et al.•Science as Culture•2010

  • Publics as Threats? Integrating Science and Technology Studies and Social Movement Studies

    David J He•Science as Culture•2014

  • Producing the Post-Fordist Public

    C Thorpe, Jane Gregory•Science as Culture•2010

  • How Economic Assumptions Constitute Publics as Consumers in South African Nanotechnology Governance

    Open Access•Koen Beumer•Science as Culture•2017

  • The Test Bed Island

    B Laurent, Liliana Doganova et al.•Science as Culture•2021

  • The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology

    Claire Marris•Science as Culture•2014

  • Bio-basing society by including emotions

    Open Access•Susanne Sleenhoff, Laurens Landeweerd et al.•Ecological Economics•2015

  • Governing by imaginaries? Regulatory legitimization of genome-edited foods in Japan

    Open Access•Tomiko Yamaguchi•Agriculture and Human Values•2025

  • Social science – STEM collaborations in agriculture, food and beyond

    Open Access•Karly Ann Burch, J Guthman et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2023

  • Progress reports

    Open Access•Gail Davies, Claire Dwyer•Progress in Human Geography•2007

  • Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge

    Open Access•M Horst, Alec Irwin•Social Studies of Science•2009

  • Creating energy citizenship through material participation

    Open Access•Marianne Ryghaug, Tomas Moe Skjølsvold et al.•Social Studies of Science•2018

  • Innovating public participation methods

    Open Access•Jan-Peter Voß, Nina Amelung•Social Studies of Science•2016

  • Political experiments that matter

    Open Access•B Laurent•Social Studies of Science•2016

  • Eloquence and incommensurability

    Open Access•Javier Lezaun•Social Studies of Science•2010

  • The good, the bad and the perfect

    Open Access•Alec Irwin, Torben Elgaard Jensen et al.•Social Studies of Science•2012

  • Governance by campaign

    Tanja Schneider, K Eli et al.•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • From experiments to ecosystems? Reviewing public participation, scientific governance and the systemic turn

    Open Access•Kathrin Braun, Sabine Könninger•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • Experiments in engagement

    Open Access•Cynthia Selin, Kelly Rawlings et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2017

  • The mobilization of scientists for public engagement

    Open Access•Martin W Bauer, P Jensen•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • “It shouldn’t look aggressive”

    Open Access•Alena Bleicher, Pauline Häßler et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2022

  • Imagining the model citizen

    Open Access•Wanheng Hu•Public Understanding of Science•2024

  • Experimenting with distributed approaches – Case study

    Open Access•Marta Entradas•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Unravelling emotional viewpoints on a bio-based economy using Q methodology

    Open Access•Susanne Sleenhoff, Eefje Cuppen et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • On the weakness of strong ties

    Open Access•M Horst•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • “… A Certain Amount of Engineering Involved”

    Open Access•Kathrin Braun, Susanne Schultz•Public Understanding of Science•2010

  • Crafting a public for geoengineering

    Open Access•Rob Bellamy, Javier Lezaun•Public Understanding of Science•2017

  • The effects of social identity threat and social identity affirmation on laypersons’ perception of scientists

    Open Access•Peter Nauroth, Mario Gollwitzer et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2017

  • Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten, Julia Silvia Guivant•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • Wireless smart meters and public acceptance

    Open Access•David J He, David J Hess et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • “What sceptics believe”

    Open Access•Kathryn Hobson, Kersty Hobson et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Tom Horlick-Jones et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2005

  • Mobile phone masts

    Open Access•Frances Drake•Public Understanding of Science•2006

  • Powers of Freedom

    Open Access•Nikolas Rose, Nikolas S Rose•Powers of Freedom•1999

  • The Human Condition

    Hannah Arendt, Margaret Canovan et al.•Human Condition•2018

  • The Human Condition

    Hannah Arendt, Margaret Canovan•Human Condition•1998

  • Creating Public Alienation

    Brian Wynne•Science as Culture•2001

  • The Politics of Talk

    Open Access•Alec Irwin•Social Studies of Science•2006

  • Pandora's hope

    Bruno Latour•Pandora's hope•1999

  • Sustaining the unsustainable

    Ingolfur Blühdorn•Environmental Politics•2007

  • How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies

    Open Access•Bruno Latour•Body & Society•2004

  • Gino's lesson on humanity

    Michel Callon, Vololona Rabeharisoa•Economy and Society•2004

Unique citing works192
Citations per year10,11
Citation span2007 - 2026 (20)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 185

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae