Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Doing Dialogue

Genre and Flexibility in Public Engagement with Science

Bibliographic Data

ID12205373
AuthorsSarah R Davies (0000-0002-2113-9103, Durham University Science Site, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume18
Issue4
Pages397-416
Publication date2009-10-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience as Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0950-5431 • E-ISSN: 1470-1189
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09505430902870591
OpenAlexW2047976608
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited46

Public engagement with science' is an increasingly important but contested practice. In this study of London's Dana Centre I look at dialogue events carried out there as a case study of public engagement, performing a detailed analysis in order to examine their nature and practice. The analysis suggests that event framings (as found in the discourse of events) are multiple, varying from lecture to open debate. Furthermore the genre of events is flexible, with participant involvement organised through the use of genres derived from education, talkshows and news interviewing as well as more traditional genres such as lectures. While it seems there is flexibility in the practice of these informal dialogue events, they are, however, not open to reinvention by all participants equally. The fluidity of practice observed may be due to the newness of these kinds of processes in most people's experiences. We are therefore observing, on the ground, the traces of contrasting discourses of the right relationship between science and society

Epistemology · Event (particle physics · Flexibility (engineering · Interview · Management · Media studies · Order (exchange · Political science · Public engagement · Public relations · Sociology · Typology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Rhetoric and Communication Studies

  • Knowing and Loving

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies•Science & Technology Studies•2014

  • Analyzing interdiscursivity in legal genres

    Open Access•W Ren, Vijay K Bhatia et al.•Pragmatics and Society•2020

  • Energy Futures

    Sarah R Davies, Cynthia Selin•Environmental Communication•2012

  • Influence in science dialogue

    Open Access•Theodore E Zorn, Juliet Roper et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2012

  • The rules of engagement

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Mapping the hinterland

    Open Access•Ann Grand, Clare Wilkinson et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Engaging With Strangers and Brief Encounters

    Open Access•Clare Wilkinson•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2014

  • On the Shoulders of Idiots

    M Horst, Mike Michael•Science as Culture•2011

  • Competing Agendas in Upstream Engagement Meetings Between Celiac Disease Experts and Patients

    Open Access•Mario Veen, Hedwig Te Molder et al.•Science Communication•2011

  • Science in Culture

    Open Access•Ana Margarida Sardo, Ann Grand•Science Communication•2016

  • Science Centers and Public Participation

    Open Access•Andrea Bandelli, Elly A Konijn•Science Communication•2013

  • Public Engagement for Informing Science and Technology Policy

    Open Access•Lisa M Pytlikzillig, Alan J Tomkins•Review of Policy Research•2011

  • On New Forms of Science Communication and Communication in Science

    Open Access•René Wilke, Miira Hill•Qualitative Inquiry•2019

  • Risk Society

    Ulrich Beck•Risk Society•2013

  • Talk on television

    Sonia Livingstone, Peter Lunt•Talk on television•1994

  • Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?

    Open Access•Brian Wynne•Public Health Genomics•2006

  • Scenario workshops and consensus conferences

    I Andersen, Ida-Elisabeth Andersen et al.•Science and Public Policy•1999

  • Foundations in sociolinguistics

    Dell H Hymes•Foundations in sociolinguistics•1974

  • Hijacking the Fairy Tale

    Open Access•Nanette Monin, John Monin•Organization•2005

  • Stimulating authentic community involvement in biotechnology policy in Australia

    Open Access•Renato Schibeci, Jeffrey Harwood•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  • Science shops

    Open Access•L Leydesdorff, Janelle Ward•Public Understanding of Science•2005

  • Deliberative mapping

    Open Access•Jacquelin Burgess, Andy Stirling et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  • Experts on public trial

    Open Access•Anders Blok•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  • Risk Society

    Ulrich Beck•Encyclopedia of Social Theory•2005

  • Consulting citizens

    Open Access•Javier Lezaun, Linda Soneryd•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  • Misunderstanding Science

    Open Access•Alec Irwin, Helen Lambert et al.•Misunderstanding Science?•1996

  • The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge

    Open Access•Michel Callon•Science Technology and Society•1999

  • The tabloid talkshow as a quasi-conversational type of face-to-face interaction

    Open Access•Carmen Gregori Signes, Carmen Gregori-Signes•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2022

  • Deliberating Risks Under Uncertainty

    Open Access•Regula Valérie Burri•NanoEthics•2007

  • Learning to Generate Dialogue

    Ellen Mccallie, Elin Simonsson et al.•Museums & Social Issues•2007

  • Strengths of Public Dialogue on Science‐related Issues

    Roland Jackson, Fiona Barbagallo et al.•Critical Review of International…•2005

  • Towards Analytic‐deliberative Forms of Risk Governance in the UK? Reflecting on Learning in Radioactive Waste

    Jason Chilvers•Journal of Risk Research•2007

  • Challenging the ‘view from nowhere’

    Open Access•Gail Davies, Jacquelin Burgess•Health & Place•2004

  • Diverging Convergences

    B Laurent•Innovation The European Journal…•2007

  • Deploying Identity for Democratic Ends on Jan Publiek– A Flemish Television Talk Show

    Open Access•Kathleen Dixon, Sonja Spee•European Journal of Women s Studies•2003

  • Power in Discourse

    Open Access•I Hutchby•Discourse & Society•1996

  • Creating Public Alienation

    Brian Wynne•Science as Culture•2001

  • Shifting Subject Positions

    Open Access•Anne Kerr, Sarah Cunningham-Burley et al.•Social Studies of Science•2007

  • The Politics of Talk

    Open Access•Alec Irwin•Social Studies of Science•2006

  • Generating Applause

    J Heritage, David Greatbatch•American Journal of Sociology•1986

  • Talk on Television

    Sonia Livingstone, Sonia M Livingstone et al.•Talk on Television•1993

  • Questioning Presidents

    Open Access•E Clayman, Steven E Clayman et al.•Journal of Communication•2002

  • Risk society

    Ulrich Beck•Risikogesellschaft•1992

  • Interpreting Qualitative Data

    David Silverman•Interpreting Qualitative Data•2015

  • Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Iris Marion Young•Political Theory•2001

  • Engaging the Public in Technology Policy

    Open Access•Larry Bell•Science Communication•2008

  • Report

    Open Access•Tinsley H Davis•Science Communication•2004

  • A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Lynn J Frewer•Science Technology & Human Values•2005

  • Processes of Inclusion, Cultures of Calculation, Structures of Power

    Open Access•Joanna Goven•Science Technology & Human Values•2006

  • Deliberating Competence

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers•Science Technology & Human Values•2008

  • Deliberations about deliberative methods

    Open Access•Julia Abelson, Pierre-Gerlier Forest et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2003

  • The limits of questioning

    Open Access•J Heritage•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

Unique citing works13
Citations per year0,87
Citation span2011 - 2020 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae