Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the Shoulders of Idiots

Re-thinking Science Communication as 'Event

Bibliographic Data

ID5846406
AuthorsM Horst (0000-0002-9641-5213, Copenhagen Business School), Mike Michael (0000-0001-9272-2294, Goldsmiths University of London)
Year2011
Volume20
Issue3
Pages283-306
Publication date2011-04-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience as Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0950-5431 • E-ISSN: 1470-1189
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09505431.2010.524199
OpenAlexW2088971327
LanguageEN
Citations received59
References cited26

Characterised by a shift from a diffusion to a deliberation model of science communication, the past decades have witnessed a proliferation of science communication formats. In order to better understand the complexity and novelty of these formats, we propose a 'model of emergence' that conceptualises science communication as an event in which the event itself, as well as the various actors that contribute to it, are emergent. To operationalise this model of emergence, we use Isabelle Stengers' figure of the idiot as an analytical tool which lets us interrogate our own implicit assumptions about science communication and the way they shape interactions in specific communication events. This makes it possible to be more sensitive to the ways in which we enable the emergence of particular identities and audience reactions, but also how we understand the role of science communicators themselves. A recent experiment with a science communication installation, 'The Landscape of Expectations', is used as an example that lets us trace how the 'idiotic behaviours' of visitors, which on one level make no sense, enable us to query presuppositions about the repertoire of behaviours available to the public and the assumed relations of power between experts and laypeople

Citizen science · Deliberation · Idiot · Presupposition · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Science Education and Perceptions

  • Science, Public Engagement with

    Open Access•Alec Irwin, Alan Irwin•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Historias científicas como cultura

    Open Access•Sara R Davies, Megan K Halpern et al.•Príncipe de Viana•2022

  • Coming Closer to Citizens? Frustrated Dialogue on the Danish Health Authority's Facebook Page During Covid-19

    Open Access•Fie Madvig, Marianne Achiam et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2022

  • Knowing and Loving

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies•Science & Technology Studies•2014

  • Examining science communication on Reddit

    Open Access•Michelle L Edwards, Caden Ziegler•Public Understanding of Science•2022

  • Can hype be a force for good

    Open Access•Tara Roberson•Public Understanding of Science•2020

  • STS and science communication

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies•Public Understanding of Science•2022

  • The disengaged in science communication

    Open Access•Maureen Burns, Fabien Medvecky•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • Comparing science communication theory with practice

    Open Access•Jenni Metcalfe•Public Understanding of Science•2019

  • Re-visioning public engagement with emerging technology

    Open Access•L Waller, Mascha Gugganig•Public Understanding of Science•2021

  • Popularizing dissent

    Open Access•Judy Motion, Shirley Leitch et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • Engaging With Strangers and Brief Encounters

    Open Access•Clare Wilkinson•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2014

  • The many faces of engagement

    Open Access•Marie Antonsen, Kristine Ask et al.•Nordic Journal of Science and…•2016

  • Science communication in the wild

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies•Public Understanding of Science•2026

  • Attending to ‘Computational Universalism’

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies, Miller Díaz-Valderrama•Social Studies of Science•2026

  • Resisting the revelatory scanner? Critical engagements with fMRI in popular media

    Open Access•Laura Whiteley•BioSocieties•2012

  • Framing regenerative medicine

    Open Access•Liliana Acero•BioSocieties•2022

  • University responsible research and innovation and society

    Open Access•Reina Ferrández-Berrueco, Odet Moliner et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2023

  • Absent, yet present? Moving with ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’ in radiation protection research

    Open Access•Michiel Van Oudheusden, Catrinel Turcanu et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2018

  • Rethinking societal engagement under the heading of Responsible Research and Innovation

    Open Access•Anja Bauer, Alexander Bogner et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2021

  • Conceptualizing playfulness for reflection processes in responsible research and innovation contexts

    Open Access•Marjoleine G van der Meij, Jacqueline E W Broerse et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2017

  • Sipping Science

    Kristian Hvidtfelt Nielsen, Gert Balling et al.•East Asian Science Technology and…•2015

  • Public Participation and Scientific Citizenship in the Science Museum in London

    Andrea Bandelli, Elly A Konijn•Visitor Studies•2015

  • The art, science and technology studies movement

    Open Access•M Horst•Social Studies of Science•2025

  • The Changing Nature of Modernization Discourses in Documentary Films

    Open Access•Carlos Tabernero, Carlos Tabernero Holgado•Science in Context•2018

  • Otherwising or Attaching? Play, Care, and Critique in Interdisciplinary Public Engagement

    Open Access•Catherine M Montgomery, Santini Basra et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2026

  • Frame Reflection Lab

    Open Access•Marjoleine G van der Meij, Anouk Heltzel et al.•NanoEthics•2018

  • Toward an organic policy sociology

    Open Access•Diana Graizbord•Sociology Compass•2019

  • Social figures as elements of sociological theorizing

    Open Access•Tobias Schlechtriemen•Distinktion Journal of Social…•2024

  • So much for snapshots’

    Open Access•Felicity Picken•Tourist Studies•2014

  • Supporting Citizens in Reflection on Synthetic Biology by Means of Video-Narratives

    Open Access•Marjoleine G van der Meij, Jacqueline E W Broerse et al.•Science Communication•2017

  • Concealed Inequality and Embedded Control

    Open Access•Zheng Yang•Science Communication•2025

  • Person with autism’ or ‘autistic person’? A human engineering lens on science communication

    Open Access•Valeria Cernei, Maarten Derksen•Disability & Society•2025

  • Science Communication as Emotion Work

    Sarah R Davies•Science as Culture•2019

  • Empty Minds

    Open Access•Veerle Spronck, Peter Peters et al.•Science as Culture•2021

  • Curating the Widerstandsaviso

    Michael Klausner, Jörg Niewöhner et al.•Science as Culture•2022

  • Bio-basing society by including emotions

    Open Access•Susanne Sleenhoff, Laurens Landeweerd et al.•Ecological Economics•2015

  • The good, the bad and the perfect

    Open Access•Alec Irwin, Torben Elgaard Jensen et al.•Social Studies of Science•2012

  • What can science and technology studies learn from art and design? Reflections on ‘Synthetic Aesthetics’

    Open Access•Jane Calvert, Pablo Schyfter•Social Studies of Science•2016

  • Comunicación pública de la ciencia y la tecnología

    Open Access•Miguel Alcíbar•Arbor•2015

  • Constructing the “Cocreative Citizen”

    Open Access•Shelly Tsui, Sebastian Pfotenhauer et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2025

  • Making research relevant to policymaking

    Open Access•Robert Duiveman•Policy Studies•2020

  • What is “Dialogue” in Public Engagement with Science and Technology? Bridging STS and Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Julián Goñi•Minerva•2024

  • Modes of Relevance in Research

    Open Access•Lucas Brunet, Maximilian Fochler et al.•Minerva•2025

  • How to do things with metaphors

    Open Access•Matthew Kearnes, Declan Kuch et al.•Life Sciences Society and Policy•2018

  • Toward Comprehensive Conceptualizations of Contemporary Public Health

    Open Access•H G J Nijhuis•International Journal of Social…•2017

  • Public Engagement Through Shared Immersion

    Open Access•Jessica Tang, Jessica Janice Tang et al.•Science Communication•2013

  • Traditional Artistic Expressions in Science Communication in a Globalized World

    Open Access•Rita Campos, Magnólia Fernandes Florêncio Araújo et al.•Science Communication•2017

  • Science Centers and Public Participation

    Open Access•Andrea Bandelli, Elly A Konijn•Science Communication•2013

  • Science Communication as a Boundary Space

    Open Access•M Horst•Science Technology & Human Values•2022

  • Between Open Deliberation and the Capturing of Public Opinion

    Open Access•Svenja Breuer, Michael Penkler•Science Technology & Human Values•2024

  • Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers, Matthew Kearnes•Science Technology & Human Values•2020

  • What Are We Busy Doing

    Open Access•Mike Michael•Science Technology & Human Values•2012

  • Unpacking a citizen self-tracking device

    Open Access•Martin Tironi, Matías Valderrama Barragán et al.•Environment and Planning D…•2018

  • Introduction

    Open Access•F Vidal•Science in Context•2018

  • Reconceptualising public acceptability

    Open Access•Simon Cohn•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2016

  • De-Signing the Object of Sociology

    Open Access•Mike Michael•The Sociological Review•2012

  • Colonial scientific-medical documentary films and the legitimization of an ideal state in post-war Spain

    Open Access•Carlos Tabernero, Carlos Tabernero Holgado et al.•História Ciências Saúde-Manguinhos•2016

  • Features and form

    Open Access•Diana Graizbord, Jamie Mcpike•Ethnography•2025

  • Scenario workshops and consensus conferences

    I Andersen, Ida-Elisabeth Andersen et al.•Science and Public Policy•1999

  • Science and governance in Europe

    L Levidow, Claire Marris•Science and Public Policy•2001

  • Studies in ethnomethodology

    Harold Garfinkel•Studies in ethnomethodology•1984

  • Actor network theory and after

    John Hassard, John Law•Actor network theory and after•1999

  • The laws of the markets

    Michel Callon•The laws of the markets•1998

  • Cloning sensations

    Open Access•M Horst•Public Understanding of Science•2005

  • Toward the Public Sphere—Reflections on the Development of Participatory Technology Assessment

    Open Access•Sandra Jo, Simon Joss•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2002

  • Consulting citizens

    Open Access•Javier Lezaun, Linda Soneryd•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  • Misunderstanding Science

    Open Access•Alec Irwin, Helen Lambert et al.•Misunderstanding Science?•1996

  • Risk and Culture

    Mary Douglas, Aaron Wildavsky•Risk and Culture•2019

  • Natural Symbols

    Mary Douglas, Profess Douglas•Natural Symbols•2004

  • Consensus Conferences as Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Edna F Einsiedel, Edna Einsiedel et al.•Science Communication•2000

  • Doing Dialogue

    Sarah R Davies•Science as Culture•2009

  • The Politics of Talk

    Open Access•Alec Irwin•Social Studies of Science•2006

  • Public Deliberation and Governance

    Open Access•Rob Hagendijk, Alec Irwin et al.•Minerva•2006

  • Risk and Blame

    Mary Douglas•Risk and Blame•1994

  • Comprehension, Apprehension, Prehension

    Mike Michael•Science Technology & Human Values•2002

  • Public Expectations of Gene Therapy

    Open Access•M Horst•Science Technology & Human Values•2007

  • Citizen Projects and Consensus-Building at the Danish Board of Technology

    Open Access•C B Jensen•Acta Sociologica•2005

Unique citing works59
Citations per year4,21
Citation span2012 - 2026 (15)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 59

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae