Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Deliberating Competence

Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice

Bibliographic Data

ID5187111
AuthorsJason Chilvers (0000-0001-9238-1653, University of Birmingham, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume33
Issue2
Pages155-185
Publication date2008-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243907307594
OpenAlexW2106409713
LanguageEN
Citations received144
References cited45

The "participatory turn" cutting across technical approaches for appraising environment, risk, science, and technology has been accompanied by intense debates over the desired nature, extent, and quality of public engagement in science. Burgeoning work evaluating the effectiveness of such processes and the social study of science in society more generally is notable, however, for lacking systematic understanding of the very actors shaping these new forms science-society interaction. This paper addresses this lacuna by drawing on United Kingdom based in-depth empirical research that made space for participatory appraisal experts to reflect on effective practice and novel questions of competence, expertise, and citizen-specialist relations within analytic-deliberative processes. Emerging practitioner principles warn that existing participatory models have not sufficiently considered constructivist perspectives on knowledge, analysis, and deliberation. Effective participatory appraisal under uncertainty needs to guard against the "technocracy of participation" by opening up to diversity, difference, antagonism, and uncertainties/indeterminacies

Citizen journalism · Citizen science · Deliberation · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Public participation · Public relations · Sociology · Technocracy · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Engineering · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Social Psychology · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • Unlocking participation

    Open Access•Daniela Fuchs•2024

  • Towards an alignment of activities, aspirations and stakeholders for responsible innovation

    Open Access•Rider W Foley, Michael J Bernstein et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2016

  • The moral psychology of value sensitive design

    Open Access•Steven Umbrello•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2018

  • Designing and evaluating analytic-deliberative engagement processes for natural resources management

    Open Access•Guillaume Peterson St‐Laurent, George Hoberg et al.•Elementa Science of the…•2020

  • Human centred science and technology—transdisciplinary foresight and co-creation as tools for active needs-based innovation governance

    Open Access•Niklas Gudowsky, Walter Peissl•European Journal of Futures…•2016

  • Following from the front

    Alfred Moore•Critical Policy Studies•2012

  • Connecting Engineering Processes and Responsible Innovation

    Rider W Foley, Beverley Gibbs•Engineering Studies•2019

  • A review of climate geoengineering appraisals

    Open Access•Rob Bellamy, Jason Chilvers et al.•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2012

  • Ethics in Business Research and Innovation. An Institutionalisation Framework

    Open Access•Elsa González Esteban•Philosophy of Management•2024

  • The evolution of local participation and the mode of knowledge production in Arctic research

    Open Access•Nicolas D Brunet, Gordon M Hickey et al.•Conservation Ecology•2014

  • Evaluation of a Mixed Participatory Method to Improve Mutual Understanding Between Consumers and Chain Actors

    Open Access•Lynn Van Wezemael, Wim Verbeke et al.•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2012

  • Improving Legitimacy in Nanotechnology Policy Development Through Stakeholder and Community Engagement

    Open Access•A Wendy Russell•Review of Policy Research•2013

  • Et pourquoi pas une éducation aux sciences qui aborde la participation des acteurs sociaux aux controverses sociotechniques

    Chantal Pouliot•Canadian Journal of Science…•2012

  • Publicly funded research

    Alejandra Real, Gordon M Hickey•Forest Policy and Economics•2013

  • Exploring public perceptions of forest adaptation strategies in Western Canada

    Open Access•Reem Hajjar, Robert A Kozak et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2015

  • Patient-expert partnerships in research

    Open Access•Janneke Elberse, Janneke E Elberse et al.•Health Expectations•2011

  • The frontiers of participatory public engagement

    Open Access•Nick Mahony, Hilde C Stephansen•European Journal of Cultural…•2016

  • Functional‐dynamic public participation in technological decision‐making

    Pius Krütli, Michael Stauffacher et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • Practising environmental policy evaluation under co-existing evaluation imaginaries

    Open Access•Eva-Maria Kunseler, Eleftheria Vasileiadou•Evaluation•2016

  • Public Participation Organizations and Open Policy

    Open Access•Helen Pallett•Science Communication•2015

  • Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers•Science Communication•2012

  • “… A Certain Amount of Engineering Involved”

    Open Access•Kathrin Braun, Susanne Schultz•Public Understanding of Science•2010

  • Stakeholder engagement in food risk management

    Open Access•John Walls, Gene Rowe et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • “What sceptics believe”

    Open Access•Kathryn Hobson, Kersty Hobson et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • The rules of engagement

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Public engagement coming of age

    Open Access•A Delgado, Kamilla Lein Kjølberg et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • Public engagement with marine climate change issues

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers, Irene Lorenzoni et al.•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • From Public Engagement to Research Intervention

    Rider W Foley, Richard Rushforth et al.•Science as Culture•2020

  • Understanding community-researcher partnerships in the natural sciences

    Open Access•Nicolas D Brunet, Gordon M Hickey et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2014

  • The power of public participation in local planning in Scotland

    Open Access•Michael Pacione•GeoJournal•2013

  • Alter-ontologies

    Open Access•Dimitris Papadopoulos•Social Studies of Science•2010

  • Evaluating Interactive Policy Making on Biotechnology

    Open Access•Jacqueline E W Broerse, Tjard De Cock Buning et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2009

  • Inclusion and Transparency in Planning Decision-Making

    Joe Weston, Michael Weston et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2013

  • What Determines the Substantive Influence of Public Participation? An Investigation of Planners’ Views on Conditions for Participatory Practices in Denmark

    Ivar Lyhne, Helle Nielsen et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2016

  • Private profit, public interest and land use planning—A conflict interpretation of residential development pressure in Glasgow's rural–urban fringe

    Open Access•Michael Pacione•Land Use Policy•2013

  • An investigation of environmental and sustainability discourses associated with the substantive purposes of environmental assessment

    Open Access•Jaap G Rozema, Alex Bond et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2012

  • Ethical implications of democratic theory for U.S. public participation in environmental impact assessment

    Open Access•Marion Hourdequin, Peter Landres et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2012

  • Contested meanings of public engagement

    Open Access•Stephen Coleman, Julie Firmstone•Media Culture & Society•2014

  • Maximizing the Policy Impacts of Public Engagement

    Open Access•Steven B Emery, Henk A J Mulder et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2015

  • Failure through Success

    Open Access•Anna Froese, Natalie Mevissen•Science Technology & Human Values•2020

  • Enacting Big Futures, Little Futures

    Open Access•Mike Michael•The Sociological Review•2017

  • Experiments in Science Policy

    Open Access•Jack Stilgoe•Minerva•2012

  • The reflective futures practitioner

    Open Access•Eva-Maria Kunseler, W Tuinstra et al.•Futures•2015

  • Policy problems, publics, and the power of definition

    Open Access•Adela Tesarek Kincaid, Amber J Fletcher•Canadian Geographies /…•2017

  • Collingridge and the dilemma of control

    Open Access•Audley Genus, Andy Stirling•Research Policy•2018

  • A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring

    Open Access•CATHY CONRAD, Cathy C Conrad et al.•Environmental Monitoring and…•2011

  • The emergence of citizen panels as a de facto standard

    Open Access•Nina Amelung•Quaderni•2012

  • Can the Science of Well-Being Be Objective

    Anna Alexandrova•The British Journal for the…•2018

  • Engaging with Users of Climate Information and the Coproduction of Knowledge

    Open Access•Michael C Kruk, Britt Parker et al.•Weather, Climate, and Society•2017

  • Plan Nacional de Aguas en Uruguay

    Open Access•Marila Lázaro, Micaela Trimble et al.•Sociedad y Ambiente•2021

  • Process expertise in policy advice

    Open Access•Giulia Molinengo, Dorota Stasiak et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • Spatialising procedural justice

    Marissa Bell•Local Environment•2021

  • Designing Participatory Technology Assessments

    Open Access•Leah R Kaplan, Mahmud Farooque et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Organising stakeholder workshops in research and innovation – between theory and practice

    Open Access•Morten Velsing Nielsen, Nina Bryndum et al.•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2017

  • Beyond Engagement Exercises

    Open Access•Maria Powell, Jason A Delborne et al.•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2011

  • Energy Futures

    Sarah R Davies, Cynthia Selin•Environmental Communication•2012

  • The Doctors of Democracy

    Open Access•Dennis Frie, Nina Katharina Herff•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2023

  • The Discursive Functions of Deliberative Voting

    Open Access•Kristie Serota, Kieran C O''Doherty•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2022

  • Obstacles in energy planning at the urban scale

    Open Access•Sébastien Cajot, Markus Peter et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2017

  • Nuclear Citizens Jury

    Cobi Calyx, Brad Jessup•Environmental Communication•2019

  • Children of the revolution? Democratic innovations during the first 50 years of democracy in Portugal

    Open Access•Roberto Falanga•European Political Science•2026

  • A three-dimensional view of public participation in Scottish land-use planning

    Open Access•Mhairi Aitken•Planning Theory•2010

  • Why do environmentalists not consider compromises as legitimate

    Open Access•Simo Sarkki, Hannu I Heikkinen•Forest Policy and Economics•2014

  • How to normalize reflexive evaluation? Navigating between legitimacy and integrity

    Open Access•Lisa Verwoerd, Pim Klaassen et al.•Evaluation•2020

  • Doing Dialogue

    Sarah R Davies•Science as Culture•2009

  • Restore politics in societal debates on new genomic techniques

    Open Access•Lonneke Poort, Jac A A Swart et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2022

  • Engagement, representativeness and legitimacy in the development of food and nutrition policy

    Open Access•Lada Timotijevic, Julie Barnett et al.•Food Policy•2011

  • Toward a manifesto for the ‘public understanding of big data’

    Open Access•Mike Michael, D Lupton•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Influencing governance of a public-private partnership in plant genomics

    Open Access•Lucien Hanssen, Bart Gremmen•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Expertise in/of co-Creation

    Open Access•Sarah R Davies, Ariadne Avkıran•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2025

  • Digital platforms in Zero Emission Vehicle transition

    Open Access•Chuang Yu Ning•Sustainable Futures•2025

  • If deliberation is the answer, what is the question? Objectives and evaluation of public participation and engagement in science and technology

    Open Access•Jesse L Reynolds, Eric B Kennedy et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2022

  • Scientists need professional development to practice meaningful public engagement

    Open Access•Kathryn A Stofer, David Hanson et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2022

  • Frame analysis of attitudes towards forest-based bioenergy in Europe

    Open Access•Daniel Bergquist, Elvira Caselunghe et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2025

  • Environmental governance through guidance

    Open Access•Matthew Cashmore, Tim Richardson et al.•Geoforum•2015

  • Unraveling the politics of ‘doing inclusion’ in transdisciplinarity for sustainable transformation

    Open Access•Kristiaan P W Kok, Mads Dahl Gjefsen et al.•Sustainability Science•2021

  • The Research on Differences and Policies of Housing Provision in UK Cities before and after the WWII

    Open Access•Renrui Wang, Ren-Rui Wang•Current Urban Studies•2022

  • Public engagement professionals

    Open Access•Clare Wilkinson, Aleksandra Stelmach et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2026

  • Synthetic Participation

    Open Access•Irina Papazu, Rose Marie Højbjerg Henrichsen•Science Technology & Human Values•2026

  • The challenges of engaging island communities

    Open Access•Gina Kallis, PHEDEAS STEPHANIDES et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Climate change scenarios and citizen-participation

    Open Access•Katarina Larsen, Ulrika Gunnarsson-Östling•Habitat International•2009

  • Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment

    Open Access•Timo P Karjalainen, Timo Karjalainen et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2013

  • Mini-publics, Social Legitimacy and Institutional Collaboration

    Open Access•Stefania Ravazzi•Administration & Society•2023

  • Environmental scenarios and local-global level of community engagement

    Open Access•Katarina Larsen, Ulrika Gunnarsson-Östling et al.•Futures•2011

  • Wind Energy on the Isle of Lewis

    Open Access•Janet Fisher, Katrina Brown•Environment and Planning A…•2009

  • Deliberative forums in fragile contexts

    Open Access•Nicole Curato, Septrin John Calamba et al.•Politics•2024

  • Oh Yes, Robots! People Like Robots; the Robot People Should do Something

    Open Access•Clare Wilkinson, Karen Bultitude et al.•Science Communication•2011

  • Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science

    Open Access•Leonie Dendler, Gaby-Fleur Böl et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2021

  • Paradise Lost? ''Science'' and ''the Public'' after Asilomar

    Open Access•Priska Gisler, Monika Kurath•Science Technology & Human Values•2011

  • Une infrastructure élusive

    Jeff Denis, Jérôme Denis et al.•Réseaux•2013

  • The epistemic tensions of nuclear waste siting in a nuclear landscape

    Open Access•Marissa Bell•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2023

  • A Decade of Learning about Publics, Participation, and Climate Change

    Open Access•Helen Pallett, Jason Chilvers•Environment and Planning A…•2013

  • Heating up' or 'Cooling Down'? Analysing and Performing Broadened Participation in Technoscientific Conflicts

    Open Access•Göran Sundqvist•Environment and Planning A…•2014

  • Environmental Risk, Uncertainty, and Participation

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers•Environment and Planning A…•2008

  • Public Engagement for Informing Science and Technology Policy

    Open Access•Lisa M Pytlikzillig, Alan J Tomkins•Review of Policy Research•2011

  • Science and citizens

    Melissa Leach, Ian Scoones et al.•Science and citizens•2005

  • What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public

    Open Access•Rob Krueger, Seth Tuler et al.•Environmental Management•2001

  • “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation

    Thomas Webler•Fairness and Competence in…•1995

  • A Novel Approach to the Appraisal of Technological Risk

    Open Access•Andy Stirling, Sue Mayer•Environment and Planning C…•2001

  • Uncertainty and Participatory Democracy

    Open Access•Luigi Pellizzoni•Environmental Values•2003

  • Expert knowledge and decision-making in controversy contexts

    Open Access•Camille Limoges•Public Understanding of Science•1993

  • The public—expert interface in local waste management decisions

    Open Access•Judith Petts•Public Understanding of Science•1997

  • Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Tom Horlick-Jones et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2005

  • Credibility and trust in risk communication

    Ortwin Renn, Debra Levine•Communicating Risks to the Public•1991

  • Pathways to Participation

    A Cornwall, Garett Pratt•Pathways to Participation•2003

  • Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation

    Open Access•Peter M Wiedemann, Ortwin Renn et al.•Fairness and Competence in…•1995

  • Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged

    Open Access•Baruch Fischhoff•Risk Analysis•1995

  • Powers of Freedom

    Open Access•Nikolas Rose, Nikolas S Rose•Powers of Freedom•1999

  • Towards Analytic‐deliberative Forms of Risk Governance in the UK? Reflecting on Learning in Radioactive Waste

    Jason Chilvers•Journal of Risk Research•2007

  • Challenging the ‘view from nowhere’

    Open Access•Gail Davies, Jacquelin Burgess•Health & Place•2004

  • Uncertainty and environmental learning 1, 2Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm

    Open Access•Brian Wynne•Global Environmental Change•1992

  • The Third Wave of Science Studies

    Open Access•H M Collins, Harry Collins et al.•Social Studies of Science•2002

  • The Politics of Talk

    Open Access•Alec Irwin•Social Studies of Science•2006

  • Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism

    Open Access•Brian Wynne•Social Studies of Science•2003

  • Public participation in impact assessment

    Open Access•Thomas Webler, Hans Kastenholz et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•1995

  • Public participation in decision making

    Open Access•Ortwin Renn, Thomas Webler et al.•Policy Sciences•1993

  • Technology on trial—public participation in decision-making related to science and technology

    Open Access•John Langrish•Futures•1980

  • Science for the post-normal age

    Open Access•Silvio Funtowicz, Silvio O Funtowicz et al.•Futures•1993

  • Indeterminacy in‐decisions – science, policy and politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) crisis

    Open Access•Steve Hinchliffe•Transactions of the Institute of…•2001

  • The myth of the best argument

    Open Access•Luigi Pellizzoni•British Journal of Sociology•2001

  • Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk

    Open Access•Daniel J Fiorino•Science Technology & Human Values•1990

  • Public Participation Methods

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Lynn J Frewer•Science Technology & Human Values•2000

  • Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Lynn J Frewer•Science Technology & Human Values•2004

  • Comparative Risk Assessment

    Open Access•Ralph M Perhac•Science Technology & Human Values•1998

  • Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making

    Open Access•Frank N Laird•Science Technology & Human Values•1993

  • The Sacred and the Profane

    Open Access•Gail Davies•Environment and Planning A…•2006

  • Environmental Communication and the Cultural Politics of Environmental Citizenship

    Open Access•J Burge, J Burgess et al.•Environment and Planning A…•1998

  • Deliberations about deliberative methods

    Open Access•Julia Abelson, Pierre-Gerlier Forest et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2003

  • New Agendas for Appraisal

    Open Access•Susan Owens, Tim Rayner et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2004

  • Mapping deliberation

    Gail Davies•Economy and Society•2006

Unique citing works95
Citations per year8
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 98

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae