Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Failure through Success

Co-construction Processes of Imaginaries (of Participation) and Group Development

Bibliographic Data

ID5336975
AuthorsAnna Froese (0000-0001-7432-7354, “Science Policy Studies” Research Group, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany, corresponding author), Natalie Mevissen (“Science Policy Studies” Research Group, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany)
Year2020
Volume45
Issue3
Pages455-487
Publication date2020-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243919864711
OpenAlexW2964021477
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited55

Participation is an important but little understood concept in science and innovation. While participation promises the production of new knowledge, social justice, and economic growth, little research has been done on its contribution to innovation processes at the group level. The concept of imaginaries can provide a window into these processes. Adopting a micro-sociological perspective, we examined the interplay between imaginaries of participation and group development within a long-term ethnographic observation study of an initiative, Energy Avant-garde, as it pursued the development of a decentralized, self-contained, and entirely renewable energy system in one German region. We scaled down the macrolevel concept of imaginaries to the group level. We found that group imaginaries are a resource for bringing order to a group and that a group is a resource for creating, operationalizing, revising, and sustaining imaginaries. We describe a "failure-through-success" story: while imaginaries initially promoted group cohesion, creativity, and productivity, in later stages, these effects were impeded by group dynamics. We therefore distinguish between process imaginaries and outcome imaginaries and conclude that, inherently, participation must be managed and employed at the appropriate stages to make valuable contributions

Epistemology · Ethnography · Operationalization · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • How does co-creation facilitate transdisciplinarity? The case of an EU energy demand research programme

    Open Access•William Throndsen, A Silvast et al.•Science as Culture•2025

  • Dialectic narratives, hostile actors, and Earth’s resources in Saskatchewan, Canada

    Open Access•Margot Hurlbert, Jane Akpan•Sustainability Science•2022

  • Synthetic Participation

    Open Access•Irina Papazu, Rose Marie Højbjerg Henrichsen•Science Technology & Human Values•2026

  • Fostering justice through engagement

    Open Access•Ivana Suboticki, Sara Heidenreich et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • Imagining climate resilient futures

    Open Access•Stephen Flood, Fionn Rogan et al.•Futures•2023

  • Collaborative Circles

    Michael P Farrell•Collaborative Circles•2001

  • Laughing Saints and Righteous Heroes

    Erika Summers Effler•Laughing Saints and Righteous…•2010

  • Culture Moves

    Thomas R Rochon•Culture Moves•1998

  • Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path

    Open Access•Diana Rhoten, Andrew Parker•Science•2004

  • Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited

    Open Access•Bruce W Tuckman, Mary Jensen et al.•Group & Organization Studies•1977

  • The Science of Team Science

    Open Access•Daniel Stokols, Kara L Hall et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•2008

  • Women in interdisciplinary science

    Open Access•Diana Rhoten, Stephanie Pfirman•Research Policy•2007

  • Social Conflict

    Dean G Pruitt, Dean Pruitt et al.•Social Conflict•2021

  • Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology

    Nicholas C Mullins•Theories and theory groups in…•1973

  • Frame analysis

    Erving Goffman, José Luis Rodríguez•Frame Analysis•1986

  • Dreamscapes of Modernity

    Sheila Jasanoff, Sang-Hyun Kim•Dreamscapes of Modernity•2015

  • Identity Theory

    Peter J Burke, Peter Burke et al.•Identity theory•2009

  • Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method

    Ralf Bohnsack, Nicolle Pfaff et al.•Qualitative Analysis and…•2010

  • States of Knowledge

    Sheila Jasanoff•States of Knowledge•2004

  • The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

    Thomas S Kuhn, Thomas Kühn et al.•La Structure des révolutions…•1996

  • The construction of technology and place

    Open Access•Sharlissa Moore, E J Hackett•Energy Research & Social Science•2015

  • The micro smart grid as a materialised imaginary within the German energy transition

    Open Access•Franziska Engels, Anna Verena Münch•Energy Research & Social Science•2015

  • From “living lab” to strategic action field

    Open Access•Weert Canzler, Franziska Engels et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2017

  • Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies

    Sheila Jasanoff, Sang-Hyun Kim•Science as Culture•2013

  • The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology

    Claire Marris•Science as Culture•2014

  • Envisioning the Social and Political Dynamics of Energy Transitions

    Sharlissa Moore•Science as Culture•2013

  • Dis-inviting the Unruly Public

    Stevienna De Saille•Science as Culture•2014

  • Publics as Threats? Integrating Science and Technology Studies and Social Movement Studies

    David J He•Science as Culture•2014

  • Science, Scientism and Imaginaries of Publics in the UK

    Ian Welsh, Brian Wynne•Science as Culture•2013

  • From causes to conditions in group research

    Open Access•J Richard Hackman•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2012

  • The Hinge

    Open Access•Gary Alan Fine•Social Psychology Quarterly•2014

  • A Refinement of Collaborative Circles Theory

    Open Access•Ugo Cortés, Ugo Corte•Social Psychology Quarterly•2013

  • The Development of Task and Social-Emotional Role Differentiation

    Peter J Burke•Sociometry•1967

  • Participant Observation

    Open Access•Danny L Jorgensen•Emerging Trends in the Social and…•2015

  • Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the 'MIT model' in three political cultures

    Open Access•Sebastian Pfotenhauer, Sheila Jasanoff•Social Studies of Science•2017

  • Morals, Materials, and Technoscience

    Open Access•Abraham S D Tidwell, Abraham Tidwell et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2015

  • Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice

    Open Access•U Felt, Judith Igelsböck et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2016

  • A Set of Categories for the Analysis of Small Group Interaction

    Robert F Bales•American Sociological Review•1950

  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Deliberating Competence

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers•Science Technology & Human Values•2008

  • Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Scientific Collaborations and Social Movements

    Open Access•John N Parker, E J Hackett•American Sociological Review•2012

  • New sources of radical innovation

    Open Access•Terry Shinn•Social Science Information•2005

  • Sociological Miniaturism

    John F Stolte, Gary Alan et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2001

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae