Failure through Success
Co-construction Processes of Imaginaries (of Participation) and Group Development
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5336975 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anna Froese (0000-0001-7432-7354, “Science Policy Studies” Research Group, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany, corresponding author), Natalie Mevissen (“Science Policy Studies” Research Group, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 455-487 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0162243919864711 |
| OpenAlex | W2964021477 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 55 |
Participation is an important but little understood concept in science and innovation. While participation promises the production of new knowledge, social justice, and economic growth, little research has been done on its contribution to innovation processes at the group level. The concept of imaginaries can provide a window into these processes. Adopting a micro-sociological perspective, we examined the interplay between imaginaries of participation and group development within a long-term ethnographic observation study of an initiative, Energy Avant-garde, as it pursued the development of a decentralized, self-contained, and entirely renewable energy system in one German region. We scaled down the macrolevel concept of imaginaries to the group level. We found that group imaginaries are a resource for bringing order to a group and that a group is a resource for creating, operationalizing, revising, and sustaining imaginaries. We describe a "failure-through-success" story: while imaginaries initially promoted group cohesion, creativity, and productivity, in later stages, these effects were impeded by group dynamics. We therefore distinguish between process imaginaries and outcome imaginaries and conclude that, inherently, participation must be managed and employed at the appropriate stages to make valuable contributions
Epistemology · Ethnography · Operationalization · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Collaborative Circles
Laughing Saints and Righteous Heroes
Culture Moves
Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path
Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited
The Science of Team Science
Women in interdisciplinary science
Social Conflict
Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology
Frame analysis
Dreamscapes of Modernity
Identity Theory
Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method
States of Knowledge
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
The construction of technology and place
The micro smart grid as a materialised imaginary within the German energy transition
From “living lab” to strategic action field
Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies
The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology
Envisioning the Social and Political Dynamics of Energy Transitions
Dis-inviting the Unruly Public
Publics as Threats? Integrating Science and Technology Studies and Social Movement Studies
Science, Scientism and Imaginaries of Publics in the UK
From causes to conditions in group research
The Hinge
A Refinement of Collaborative Circles Theory
The Development of Task and Social-Emotional Role Differentiation
Participant Observation
Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the 'MIT model' in three political cultures
Morals, Materials, and Technoscience
Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice
A Set of Categories for the Analysis of Small Group Interaction
Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science
Deliberating Competence
Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Scientific Collaborations and Social Movements
New sources of radical innovation
Sociological Miniaturism
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |