Qué mueve a confiar en la gobernanza colaborativa? Análisis de un programa gubernamental en el País Vasco
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19907145 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xabier Barandiarán (0000-0002-7557-9331, Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa), Maria Jose Canel (0000-0002-5048-124X, Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Geert Bouckaert (0000-0002-0282-8106) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Pages | 251-275 |
| Publication date | 2022-11-28 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista Española de Ciencia Política (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1575-6548 • E-ISSN: 2173-9870 |
| Publisher | Asociacion Espanola de Ciencia Politica y de al Administracion (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.21308/recp.60.09 |
| OpenAlex | W4310190414 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 26 |
Collaborative governance constitutes an aspiration in both the study and practice of public management. In this endeavour, trust is an intangible resource that gets of special relevance, because it is assumed that in order to foster the participation of different actors in public policies it is necessary to acknowledge the value of their contributions. While the literature on citizen trust on collaborative government programs is large, works about both intra-organizational trust (between politicians and civil servants) and inter-organizational trust (from the latter to societal organizations) are scarce. This article explores the dynamics of trust between actors (politicians, civil servants and citizens) who participate in a governmental program of collaborative governance (Etorkizuna Eraikiz, Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa), and it focuses on the sources or drivers of trust.Based on the grounded theory for the thematic analysis of in depth semi-structured interviews with actors involved in the program (politicians, civil servants and civil organizations), the article explores the sources and drivers of trust by applying a typology that distinguishes formal sources (structures and rules) from informal ones (interactions). The analysis reveals that the spaces of interaction created by collaboration develop normative frameworks with strongly shared values that suggest the existence of some typical group orientation leading to trust. Based on these findings, some challenges are identified for the advancement of the study and practice of collaborative governance
Civil servants · Collaborative governance · Corporate governance · Management · Normative · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Typology · Administrative Law and Governance · Law · Public Administration · Public Policy and Governance · Social Sciences and Policies
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Co-Production and Co-Creation
Public value creation through collaborative innovation
Not So Different After All
Thematic analysis.
Implementing collaborative governance
Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement
Development and validation of a propensity to trust scale
Trust and Distrust as Distinct Concepts
From Engagement to Co-production
Functions and Dysfunctions of Interorganizational Trust and Distrust in the Public Sector
Trust in Governance Networks
The Role of Trust in the Modern Administrative State
What’s left of trust in a network society? An evolutionary model and critical discussion of trust and societal communication
Trust
Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction
Civic Engagement in the Twenty‐First Century
Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness
Varieties of Participation in Public Services
Public Service Motivation (PSM) and Support for Citizen Participation
Putting the Public Back into Governance
Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation
When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust
Community Engagement
Investing in Democracy
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |