Admission is Free Only If Your Dad is Rich! Distributional Effects of Corruption in Schools in Developing Countries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19914060 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Shahe Emran (0000-0002-4375-0958, George Washington University), Asad Islam (0000-0002-0928-0454, Monash University), Asadul Islam (0000-0001-9510-1178), Forhad Shilpi (0000-0003-0112-8340, World Bank Group) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Publication date | 2013-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Publisher | World Bank, Washington, DC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1596/1813-9450-6671 |
| OpenAlex | W1874160311 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 26 |
In the standard model of corruption, the \n rich are more likely to pay bribes for their children's \n education, reflecting higher ability to pay. This prediction \n is, however, driven by the assumption that the probability \n of punishment for bribe-taking is invariant across \n households. In many developing countries lacking in rule of \n law, this assumption is untenable, because the enforcement \n of law is not impersonal or unbiased and the poor have \n little bargaining power. In a more realistic model where the \n probability of punishment depends on the household's \n economic status, bribes are likely to be regressive, both at \n the extensive and intensive margins. Using rainfall \n variations as an instrument for household income in rural \n Bangladesh, this paper finds strong evidence that corruption \n in schools is doubly regressive: (i) the poor are more \n likely to pay bribes, and (ii) among the bribe payers, the \n poor pay a higher share of their income. The results \n indicate that progressivity in bribes reported in the \n earlier literature may be due to identification challenges. \n The Ordinary Least Squares regressions show that bribes \n increase with household income, but the Instrumental \n Variables estimates suggest that the Ordinary Least Squares \n results are spurious, driven by selection on ability and \n preference. The evidence reported in this paper implies that \n "free schooling" is free only for the rich and \n corruption makes the playing field skewed against the poor. \n This may provide a partial explanation for the observed \n educational immobility in developing countries
Bargaining power · Demographic economics · Developing country · Econometrics · Economic growth · Economics · Enforcement · Estimation · Instrumental variable · Language change · Microeconomics · Ordinary least squares · Political science · Public economics · Punishment (psychology) · Spurious relationship · Statistics · Corruption and Economic Development · Economic Growth and Development · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Law · Psychology
Local Capture
Estimating the Value of Political Connections
Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models
Maternal Education, Home Environments, and the Development of Children and Adolescents
Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects
A model of intergenerational mobility variation over time and place
New Frontiers in Diagnosing and Combating Corruption
Corruption and the costs of redistribution
What Determines Corruption? International Evidence From Microdata
Obtaining a Driver's License in India
Who Must Pay Bribes and How Much? Evidence from a Cross Section of Firms
Identification Through Heteroskedasticity
Access to Markets and Rural Poverty
Heteroskedastic Sample Selection and Developing-Country Wage Equations
Aid and Growth
The Law and Economics of Bribery and Extortion
Is Bribery Really Regressive? Bribery’s Costs, Benefits, and Mechanisms
Child labor and agricultural shocks
Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence
Poverty and crime in 19th century Germany
The Simple Economics of Extortion
An Equilibrium Theory of the Distribution of Income and Intergenerational Mobility
Monitoring Corruption
Intelligence
Do Police Reduce Crime? Estimates Using the Allocation of Police Forces After a Terrorist Attack
Eight Questions about Corruption
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2018 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |