Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Myth of Voter Fraud

Bibliographic Data

ID19945545
AuthorsLorraine C Minnite (corresponding author)
Year2019
Pages312
Publication date2019-12-31
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueMyth of Voter Fraud (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCornell University Press (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.7591/9780801459061
OpenAlexW574827249
Open LibraryOL33429161M
ISBN9780801459061
LanguageEN
Citations received55

Allegations that widespread voter fraud is threatening to the integrity of American elections and American democracy itself have intensified since the disputed 2000 presidential election. The claim that elections are being stolen by illegal immigrants and unscrupulous voter registration activists and vote buyers has been used to persuade the public that voter malfeasance is of greater concern than structural inequities in the ways votes are gathered and tallied, justifying ever tighter restrictions on access to the polls. Yet, that claim is a myth. In The Myth of Voter Fraud , Lorraine C. Minnite presents the results of her meticulous search for evidence of voter fraud. She concludes that while voting irregularities produced by the fragmented and complex nature of the electoral process in the United States are common, incidents of deliberate voter fraud are actually quite rare. Based on painstaking research aggregating and sifting through data from a variety of sources, including public records requests to all fifty state governments and the U.S. Justice Department, Minnite contends that voter fraud is in reality a politically constructed myth intended to further complicate the voting process and reduce voter turnout. She refutes several high-profile charges of alleged voter fraud, such as the assertion that eight of the 9/11 hijackers were registered to vote, and makes the question of voter fraud more precise by distinguishing fraud from the manifold ways in which electoral democracy can be distorted. Effectively disentangling misunderstandings and deliberate distortions from reality, The Myth of Voter Fraud provides rigorous empirical evidence for those fighting to make the electoral process more efficient, more equitable, and more democratic.

Art · Business · Computer security · Internet privacy · Literature · Mythology · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection · Computer Science · Corruption and Economic Development · Law, Rights, and Freedoms

  • Don't Let the Illegals Vote!”

    Open Access•Robert Courtney Smith•RSF The Russell Sage Foundation…•2017

  • The Supreme Court, the Voting Rights Act and Competing National Imaginaries of the USA

    John Rennie Short•Territory Politics Governance•2014

  • The neo-Redemption Era? APD in the age of #Black lives matter

    Kimberley Johnson•Politics Groups and Identities•2018

  • News attention to voter fraud in the 2008 and 2012 US elections

    Open Access•Brian J Fogarty, Jessica Curtis et al.•Research & Politics•2015

  • The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections

    Open Access•Nicolas Berlinski, Margaret Doyle et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2021

  • Identifying the determinants of electoral integrity and administration in advanced democracies

    Open Access•Alistair Clark•European Political Science Review•2017

  • Who are the victims of electoral fraud in Great Britain? Evidence from survey research

    Open Access•Stephen Farrall, Stuart Wilks-Heeg et al.•British Politics•2021

  • Gender Stereotypes and Corruption

    Open Access•Tiffany D Barnes, Emily Beaulieu•Politics & Gender•2014

  • The Last Stand

    Open Access•Desmond S King, Desmond King et al.•Du Bois Review Social Science…•2016

  • Race, Party, and American Voting Rights

    Open Access•David A Bateman•The Forum•2016

  • Angry about Fraud

    Open Access•Heath Brown, Lindsey Cormack•The Forum•2021

  • Trump

    Open Access•Markus Bernhard, Michael Bernhard et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • How Acorn Was Framed

    Open Access•Peter Dreier, Christopher R Martins•Perspectives on Politics•2010

  • Jim Crow 2.0? Why States Consider and Adopt Restrictive Voter Access Policies

    Open Access•Keith Gunnar Bentele, Erin E O'Brien et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2013

  • Identifying Election Fraud Using Orphan and Low Propensity Voters

    Open Access•Ray Christensen, Thomas J Schultz•American Politics Research•2014

  • Understanding the Adoption of Voter Identification Laws in the American States

    Open Access•Daniel R Biggers, Michael J Hanmer•American Politics Research•2017

  • Voting by Mail and Turnout in Oregon

    Open Access•Paul Gronke, Peter Miller•American Politics Research•2012

  • A Partisan Model of Electoral Reform

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2016

  • How Local Media Coverage of Voter Fraud Influences Partisan Perceptions in the United States

    Open Access•Adriano Udani, David C Kimball et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2018

  • Much Ado About Nothing? An Empirical Assessment of the Georgia Voter Identification Statute

    Open Access•M V Hood, Charles S Bullock•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2012

  • Political Rights in the Age of Migration

    Open Access•Ron Hayduk•Journal of International…•2015

  • Special issue

    Nicolás Bas Martins, Nicolas Martin et al.•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2019

  • Election Administration and Public Records Responsiveness

    Anna Baringer, Justin Eichermuller et al.•Public Integrity•2022

  • The Effect of Conspiratorial Thinking and Motivated Reasoning on Belief in Election Fraud

    Open Access•Jack Edelson, Alexander Alduncin et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • Measuring Electoral Integrity around the World

    Open Access•P Norris, Richard W Frank et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • Fears and Facts About Electoral Integrity

    Open Access•Charles Stewart, Charles V Stewart•Journal of democracy•2017

  • The 2020 presidential election and beliefs about fraud

    Open Access•A M Enders, Joseph E Uscinski et al.•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Does the world agree about standards of electoral integrity? Evidence for the diffusion of global norms

    P Norris•Electoral Studies•2013

  • Multiple meanings? The link between partisanship and definitions of voter fraud

    Open Access•Geoffrey Sheagley, Adriano Udani•Electoral Studies•2021

  • From voter ID to party ID

    Open Access•Emily Beaulieu•Electoral Studies•2014

  • Perceived electoral malfeasance and resentment over the election of Barack Obama

    Open Access•David C Wilson, Tyson King-Meadows•Electoral Studies•2016

  • The new research agenda studying electoral integrity

    P Norris•Electoral Studies•2013

  • An exploration of Donald Trump's allegations of massive voter fraud in the 2016 General Election

    Open Access•David Cottrell, Michael C Herron et al.•Electoral Studies•2018

  • All-mail voting in Colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality

    Open Access•Adam Bonica, Jacob M Grumbach et al.•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Can the Backlash Against Voter ID Laws Activate Minority Voters? Experimental Evidence Examining Voter Mobilization Through Psychological Reactance

    Open Access•Daniel R Biggers•Political Behavior•2021

  • Implementing voter ID

    Joseph Anthony, David C Kimball•Policy Studies•2020

  • Electoral integrity, voter fraud and voter ID in polling stations

    Toby S James, Alistair Clark•Policy Studies•2020

  • Public Administration and the Integrity of the Electoral Process in British Elections

    Open Access•Alistair Clark•Public Administration•2014

  • Does threatening their franchise make registered voters more likely to participate? Evidence from an aborted voter purge

    Open Access•Daniel R Biggers, Daniel A Smith•British Journal of Political…•2020

  • One Person, One Vote

    Open Access•Sharad Goel, Matthew Meredith et al.•American Political Science Review•2020

  • Making Outsiders' Votes Count

    Open Access•Kentaro Fukumoto, Yusaku Horiuchi•American Political Science Review•2011

  • Democracy More or Less

    Open Access•Bruce E Cain, Bruce Cain•Democracy more or less•2014

  • Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters

    John Michael Carey, Katherine Clayton et al.•Journal of Elections Public…•2022

  • Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms

    Open Access•Katherine Clayton, Nicholas T Davis et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2021

  • Understanding public attitudes toward restrictive voting laws in the United States

    Open Access•Katherine Clayton•Research & Politics•2023

  • Corruption, Gerrymandering and Perceptions of Election Integrity

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan•American Politics Research•2025

  • Writing about a Party System under Duress and in Dispute

    Open Access•Seth Masket, Hubert Noël•PS Political Science & Politics•2022

  • Documenting Americans

    Magdalena Krajewska•Documenting Americans•2017

  • Voter Fraud, Voter ID, and Legitimacy

    Open Access•Celeste Fong, Christian Fong•American Politics Research•2026

  • Partisan Strategy and the Adoption of Same-Day Registration in the American States

    Open Access•Christian Caron•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2022

  • Confidence in US Elections After the Big Lie

    Open Access•Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Suspicious Minds

    Open Access•Philippe Mongrain•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Would You Sell Your Vote

    Open Access•Jordan Gans-Morse, Simeon Nichter•American Politics Research•2021

  • Does Congress Still Care about Fraud, Waste, and Abuse

    Heath Brown•Public Integrity•2021

  • Only in America? Executive partisan interest and the politics of election administration in Ireland, the UK and the USA

    Toby S James•Contemporary Politics•2011

Unique citing works55
Citations per year3,44
Citation span2010 - 2026 (17)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae