Fears and Facts About Electoral Integrity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6286450 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles Stewart (0000-0003-1428-7308), Charles V Stewart (0000-0001-6532-6675, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 50-62 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of democracy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1045-5736 • E-ISSN: 1086-3214 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/jod.2017.0024 |
| OpenAlex | W2607261347 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 3 |
This paper puts the issues of election integrity that arose in 2016 in context. First, I identify four integrity-related themes that have arisen in American elections since the 2000 presidential election. Second, I examine what it means to assess the health of the American electoral system. Third, I provide two frameworks for assessing the health of the election system, one that takes the perspective of a typical voter, the other that focuses on the flow of information in an election. I conclude by bringing this discussion back to the specific case of 2016, providing a preliminary assessment of the health of the election process in the most recent federal election
Context (archaeology · Federal election · Perspective (graphical · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Process (computing · Public relations · Sociology · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · History · Law · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |