In Defense of Openness
Why Global Freedom Is the Humane Solution to Global Poverty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19984397 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bas Van Der Vossen (0000-0002-1036-6087), Jason Brennan (0000-0001-5636-782X) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Pages | 240 |
| Publication date | 2018-08-22 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | In Defense of Openness (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780190462956.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2888439986 |
| Open Library | OL27847010M |
| ISBN | 9780190462956 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
The humane and workable solution to global poverty is freedom. We can help the poor—and help ourselves at the same time—by tearing down our walls and trade barriers. Both justice and good economic sense require that we open borders, free up international trade, and respect the economic liberties of people around the world. What global justice requires is an open world. Most books on global justice see the world’s poor as little more than mouths to be fed. Their authors see justice as a zero-sum game: some must lose so that others may win. They rely on controversial moral intuitions and outdated or mistaken economic beliefs about economic growth. Van der Vossen and Brennan present global justice as a positive-sum game: the methods that can best help the world’s poor also help everyone else. Using mainstream development economics and common-sense moral intuitions, they argue that instead of treating the world’s poor as helpless victims who must be rescued by the rich, we should remove the coercive limits that keep people poor in the first place. We should offer people the freedom to work, produce, trade, and migrate, in ways that help better themselves and others who are willing to cooperate with them. In Defense of Openness offers a new approach to global justice: we don’t need to “save” the poor. The poor will save themselves, if only we would get out of their way and let them
Economic Justice · Economics · Global justice · Law and economics · Mainstream · Openness to experience · Political economy · Political science · Poverty · Sociology · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Free trade · Liberty
Should Employers Pay a Living Wage?
The North–South Distinction
Property, the environment, and the Lockean Proviso
Diversity for Justice vs. Diversity for Performance
Openness as a Political Commitment
Can Temporary Migration Programs Be Reformed
Labour injustice, protectionism, and transnational solidarity
Domestic institutions, growth and global justice
Utopia and the minimal state
Borders, Movement, and Global Egalitarianism
Only libertarianism can provide a robust justification for open borders
Protecting the entrepreneurial poor
Social beneficence
Economic Migration
Against Epistocracy
Re-examining extreme poverty before and after the transition to capitalism, 1300s–1900s
Libertarianism after Nozick
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,13 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |