The Iron Cage of Liberalism

International Politics and Unarmed Revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa

Bibliographic Data

ID19996624
AuthorsDaniel P Ritter (0009-0009-3266-9917, corresponding author), Daniel Ritter (corresponding author)
Year2014
Pages248
Publication date2014-12-18
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueIron Cage of Liberalism (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199658329.001.0001
OpenAlexW1542368450
ISBN9780199658329
Open LibraryOL28544879M
LanguageEN
Citations received14

Revolutions no longer stand to be recognized. In contrast to the processes of political and social change spearheaded—and romanticized—by revolutionaries like Lenin and Mao, contemporary revolutions no longer require violent struggle in order to secure victory over authoritarian states. This book seeks to understand unarmed revolutions by posing two interrelated questions: Why do nonviolent revolutionary movements in some countries manage to topple autocratic leaders while similar movements elsewhere are brutally crushed, and why has the world witnessed a proliferation of unarmed revolution in the last forty years? Through a comparative historical analysis of the Iranian, Tunisian, and Egyptian revolutions, it shows that close and friendly international relations between democratic states in the West and authoritarian regimes elsewhere constitute a parsimonious and plausible explanation for nonviolent revolutionary success. Looking beyond the immediate causes of revolutionary outbreaks, it instead focuses on the contexts that characterize episodes of successful civil resistance against repressive states. In an original conceptualization of revolutionary dynamics, it argues that Western-aligned autocrats eventually find themselves restrained by their strong links to the democratic world through a mechanism he refers to as “the iron cage of liberalism.” Having committed rhetorically to the West’s foundational discourse of democracy and human rights, the dictators in Tehran, Tunis, and Cairo found themselves paralyzed when nonviolent crowds challenged them with tactics and demands fully compatible with the political ideals the regimes claimed as their own

Ancient history · Cage · critique of liberalism · iron cage · Liberalism · Middle East · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Structural engineering · Engineering · Globalization and political ideologies · History · Islamic Studies and History · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theory and Democracy · Political Theory and Influence · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory · 20th century · 21st century · Africa · International Relations · Liberalismus · Middle east · Nonviolence · north · Political aspects · Political participation · revolution · Revolutions · Social movements