Using Frames to Make Scientific Communication More Effective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20002858 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James N Druckman (0000-0002-1249-6790), Arthur Lupia (0000-0003-3220-1125) |
| Editors | Kathleen Hall Jamieson (0000-0002-4167-3688), Dan M Kahan (0000-0002-2737-2512), Dietram A Scheufele (0000-0002-9914-5407) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Publication date | 2017-06-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.38 |
| OpenAlex | W2735083433 |
| ISBN | 9780190497620 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 39 |
Science can serve as a valuable foundation for the making of public policy. For science to have this effect, it must be effectively communicated to individuals, organizations, and institutions. Effective science communication often involves frames that highlight particular aspects of a scientific finding or issue. This chapter discusses ways in which frames can be used to facilitate effective scientific communication—particularly we explore the impact of frames with regard to attention limitations, political polarization, and the politicization of science. We also highlight unanswered questions and challenges. The main lesson of this chapter is that there are certain conditions under which choosing particular frames yields more effective communication. While understanding these conditions does not guarantee success, it can help science communicators avoid common mistakes
Engineering ethics · Foundation (evidence) · Management science · Political science · Science communication · Science education · Scientific communication · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Law · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Message framing, environmental behaviour and support for carbon capture and storage in Australia
A retrospective study of a climate change communication train-the-trainer program
The Politics of Contagion
A feel for the frame
How cultural evolution can inform the science of science communication—and vice versa
Examining United Nations VR Content Production Usage of Experiential Media in Climate Change Storytelling
“The Torah Shelters and Saves”
Framing with facts
The Ambivalent Partisan
Science communication as political communication
Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming
The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility
Representativeness Revisited
Local Warming
Communicating science in politicized environments
Public opinion on energy development
The Conditional Nature of the Local Warming Effect
Counteracting the Politicization of Science
Uninformed Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It
The Psychological Distance of Climate Change
The Honest Broker
How warm days increase belief in global warming
Personally Relevant Climate Change
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
The End of Framing as we Know it … and the Future of Media Effects
Hearts or minds? Identifying persuasive messages on climate change
Framing Science
Declining public concern about climate change
Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science
Public understanding of climate change in the United States
Turning Personal Experience into Political Attitudes
How Frames Can Undermine Support for Scientific Adaptations
Global warming" or "climate change
Moral Concerns and Policy Attitudes
The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence
The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion
Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments
Learning More from Political Communication Experiments
Visceral fit
Communicating Policy-Relevant Science
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus
Scientific Certainty Argumentation Methods (SCAMs)
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |