Canonizing Paul
Ancient Editorial Practice and the Corpus Paulinum
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20020995 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eric W Scherbenske (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Pages | 383 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Canonizing Paul (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199917341.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4241246592 |
| Open Library | OL25355450M |
| ISBN | 9780199917341 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 25 |
Canonizing Paul explores how ancient editorial practices utilized in the production of corpora (e.g. preparation of texts, selection and arrangement of tracts, and composition and deployment of paratexts) were employed to shape not only editions of Paul's letters (i.e. the Marcionite, Euthalian, and Vulgate) but also their interpretation. Investigation into the Marcionite edition shows how its paratexts introduced Marcion's hermeneutic and, in some measure, justified his editorial principles. The Euthalian edition pursued instead a catechetical and pedagogical goal extending from the deployment of paratexts to the organization of the tracts and a textual arrangement for ease of comprehension. The exploration of text and, sometimes disparate, paratexts culminates in an investigation of Codex Fuldensis, which transmits Rufinus of Syria's Vulgate textual revision of Paul's letters and its Primum Quaeritur prologue alongside numerous other paratexts, among them the Marcionite prologues, Old Latin capitula, and capitula drawn from the Euthalian edition. The incorporation of such diverse paratexts, loosed from their original editions and juxtaposed with later editorial products founded on alternative hermeneutical presuppositions, resulted in interpretive tensions that testify to the physical manuscript as a locus of authority over which many early Christians were trying to gain interpretive control, if not by altering the text, then by furnishing paratexts. Demonstrating how these practices and interpretive concerns left their mark on these editions of the Corpus Paulinum reveals that editorial practices and hermeneutics were deeply, sometimes inextricably, intertwined
Art · Epistemology · Hermeneutics · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Literature · Presupposition · Prologue · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Philosophy · Theology and Canon Law Studies · Bible · Bible, commentaries, n. t. epistles of paul · Bible, criticism, textual, n. t · Canon · Textgeschichte · Textual Criticism
The Reception of Paul and Early Christian Initiation
Architectural Criticism in the Roman World and the Limits of Literary Interaction
Keeping/Losing Records, Keeping/Losing Faith
Patronage, Cultural Difference and Literary Interactivity
Shaping Buildings into Stories
Plutarch and Roman Exemplary Ethics
Beyond Romans and Others
Constructing a New Imperial Paradoxography
Tactical Interactions
Gilgamos in Rome
A Formation of a Christian Archive?
The Noise-Lovers
Dying for Justice
Chaldean Interactions
Literature and Culture in the Roman Empire, 96–235
The Romance of Republican History
Allegory and Ambiguity in Late Antique Canon Lists
Canonizing Paul’s Epistle to the Laodiceans Paratextual Negotiations of Authorship and Authority in the Latin Bible
Exposing Textual Corruption
Papyrus 32 (Titus) as a Multi-text Codex
The Origins of Pauline Theology
Colossal Cave Archaeology
Absent in Body, Present in Spirit
If You Can Change Your Name, You Can Write
Early Textual Scholarship on Acts
| Unique citing works | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,92 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 25 |