The Struggle for Order
Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20031865 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Evelyn Goh (0000-0002-4769-4789, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Pages | 272 |
| Publication date | 2013-08-15 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | The Struggle for Order (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599363.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4241611024 |
| Open Library | OL27589240M |
| ISBN | 9780199599363 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 121 |
How has world order changed since the Cold War ended? Do we live in an age of American empire, or is global power shifting to the East with the rise of China? Arguing that existing ideas about balance of power and power transition are inadequate, this book instead conceives of an ‘order transition’ that has occurred in East Asia since 1989. Building on advances in ‘English School’ approaches, this book highlights that hegemonic power is based on both coercion and consent, and hegemony is crucially underpinned by shared norms and values. Thus hegemons must constantly legitimize their unequal power to other states. In periods of strategic change, the most important political dynamics centre on this bargaining process, conceived here as the negotiation of a social compact. This book studies the re-negotiation of this consensual compact between the U.S., China and other states in post-Cold War East Asia. It analyses institutional bargains to constrain and justify power; attempts to re-define the relationship between a regional community and the global economic order; the evolution of great power authority in regional conflict management; and the salience of competing justice claims in memory disputes. It finds that U.S. hegemony has been established in East Asia in spite of China’s rise, because of the complicity of key regional states. But the new social compact also makes room for rising powers and satisfies smaller states’ insecurities. The book controversially proposes that the East Asian order is hegemonic and hierarchical – led by the U.S. but incorporating China, Japan, and other states in multiple tiers below it
China · East Asia · Empire · Great power · Hegemony · International relations · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · 1989 · Außenpolitik · foreign relations · Grossmachtpolitik · Internationale Politik · united states
Subaltern Realism
Conceptualizing the Economic-Security-Identity Nexus in East Asia’s Regional Order
The concept of hedging and its application to Southeast Asia
Saving National IR from Exceptionalism
American Perspectives and Blind Spots on World Politics
Rethinking Hierarchies in East Asian Historical IR
Studying Asian and comparative regionalism through Amitav Acharya's work
Global Disorder
After Failure
Strong-State Restraint as a Legitimation Strategy
The International Relations of East Asia
Domination for the Rest? Creating and Contesting Secondary State-Led International Hierarchies
Status Orders
The Dynamics of Global Power Politics
Regime Security and Regional Cooperation Among Weak States
US Dominance and American Bias in International Relations Scholarship
The United States, China, and the Politics of Hegemonic Ordering in East Asia
Stigma, hierarchy, and the Eurozone
China’s Rise and a New Perspective on Hegemonic Stability Theory
Prabowo’s China Policy and Its Implications for Indonesia–Taiwan Relations
Socializing states into a rules-based international order
Combinative Hedging
Role Conception of the Asia-Pacific Middle Powers
Political convergence between the EU and Asean
Systemic Change and Regional Orders
Reimagining East Asian multilateral cooperation in economy and security
Evaluating the effectiveness of China’s nation branding with data from social media
S400s, sanctions and defiance
Maritime politics as discourse in the Indo/Asia-Pacific
Hierarchy in practice
Understanding spheres of influence in international politics
The strategist’s dilemma
Northeast Asia's New ‘History Spiral’
Vietnam's Emergence as a Middle Power in Asia
Interpreting great power rights in international society
Toward a differentiation-based framework for middle power behavior
Is anyone a middle power? The case for historicization
The English School and postcolonial state agency
The Authors Respond – Stacie Goddard
Why Vietnam is not Balancing China
The power of partnerships
Iran and the regionalization of (in)security
Japan, South Korea and the rise of a networked security architecture in East Asia
China’s rise and US hegemony
The strategic value of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the consequences of abandoning it for the US role in Asia
Southeast Asian perspectives on regional alliance dynamics
Multilateralism and East Asian transitions
In response
Regional powers, global aspirations
Networking hegemony
Liberal hegemony, international order, and US foreign policy
The changing regional faces of peace
Building regional order
Who lost Ethiopia? The unmaking of an African anchor state and U.S. foreign policy
Lonely China, Popular United States
The United States is a messianic state
Beyond geopolitical fetishism
Taming Chinese power
Going global
Explaining Japan’s post-Cold War security policy trajectory
A distinctive global pivotal state? The intra-hierarchical messaging of the ROK Indo-Pacific strategy
Asia’s Lesser Powers Confront US–China Threat to the Regional Order
Between a Rock and a Hard Place
China’s rise in a liberal world order in transition – introduction to the Forum
Polarization among the Asean member states
Contesting liberal internationalism
The unintended consequences of US deep engagement in the South China Sea
Indonesia’s hedging plus policy in the face of China’s rise and the US-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific region
Asean’s constructed dichotomies
Bargaining interactions reconsidered
India and order transition in the Indo-Pacific
Adoption, accommodation or opposition? - regional powers respond to American-led Indo-Pacific strategy
Asean as the ‘regional conductor’
Theorising the international relations of Asia
Contested Asia's ‘New’ multilateralism and regional order
Middle powers amid Sino-U.S. rivalry
Global IR through dialogue
Power transitions and great power management
Right target; wrong tactics
Vietnam’s growing agency in the twenty-first century
Late Ottoman Order in India
Status symbols in world politics
Face-work in East Asia’s Diplomatic Culture
East Asian Civilization and the Problem of Region Making
How the East Was Won
Indonesia’s New Partial Multialignment Strategy
China’s rise, the USA and global order
Hegemonic orders and the idea of history
What Watson can teach us about war and order
Who fears which great power? Symmetric and asymmetric threat perceptions in East Asia
Asian security roles in a recalibrating gulf
China’s global health governance in Africa before Covid-19
“Hedging” and “Context Analysis” in Malaysian Foreign Relations
Security expertise and international hierarchy
Informal imposed hierarchies in world politics and internal instabilities in subordinate states
Pulled East. The rise of China, Europe and French security policy in the Asia-Pacific
International Order in Historical East Asia
Soft Balancing, Binding or Bandwagoning? Understanding Institutional Responses to Power Disparities in the Americas
The art of hedging
China-US competition in Africa
| Unique citing works | 121 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 11 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | Yes |
| Citation types | Neutral: 121 |