Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Struggle for Order

Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia

Bibliographic Data

ID20031865
AuthorsEvelyn Goh (0000-0002-4769-4789, corresponding author)
Year2013
Pages272
Publication date2013-08-15
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueThe Struggle for Order (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599363.001.0001
OpenAlexW4241611024
Open LibraryOL27589240M
ISBN9780199599363
LanguageEN
Citations received121

How has world order changed since the Cold War ended? Do we live in an age of American empire, or is global power shifting to the East with the rise of China? Arguing that existing ideas about balance of power and power transition are inadequate, this book instead conceives of an ‘order transition’ that has occurred in East Asia since 1989. Building on advances in ‘English School’ approaches, this book highlights that hegemonic power is based on both coercion and consent, and hegemony is crucially underpinned by shared norms and values. Thus hegemons must constantly legitimize their unequal power to other states. In periods of strategic change, the most important political dynamics centre on this bargaining process, conceived here as the negotiation of a social compact. This book studies the re-negotiation of this consensual compact between the U.S., China and other states in post-Cold War East Asia. It analyses institutional bargains to constrain and justify power; attempts to re-define the relationship between a regional community and the global economic order; the evolution of great power authority in regional conflict management; and the salience of competing justice claims in memory disputes. It finds that U.S. hegemony has been established in East Asia in spite of China’s rise, because of the complicity of key regional states. But the new social compact also makes room for rising powers and satisfies smaller states’ insecurities. The book controversially proposes that the East Asian order is hegemonic and hierarchical – led by the U.S. but incorporating China, Japan, and other states in multiple tiers below it

China · East Asia · Empire · Great power · Hegemony · International relations · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · 1989 · Außenpolitik · foreign relations · Grossmachtpolitik · Internationale Politik · united states

  • Subaltern Realism

    Open Access•Richard Javad Heydarian•The Rise of Duterte•2018

  • Conceptualizing the Economic-Security-Identity Nexus in East Asia’s Regional Order

    Open Access•Evelyn Goh•Japan and Asia’s Contested Order•2019

  • The concept of hedging and its application to Southeast Asia

    Open Access•Jürgen Haacke•International Relations of the…•2019

  • Saving National IR from Exceptionalism

    Open Access•Xiaoting Li•International Studies Review•2021

  • American Perspectives and Blind Spots on World Politics

    Open Access•Jeff D Colgan•Journal of Global Security Studies•2019

  • Rethinking Hierarchies in East Asian Historical IR

    Open Access•James Mackay, Joseph Mackay•Journal of Global Security Studies•2018

  • Studying Asian and comparative regionalism through Amitav Acharya's work

    Anja Jetschke, Atanu Acharya et al.•International Relations of the…•2015

  • Global Disorder

    Open Access•Aaron C Mckeil•Global Studies Quarterly•2022

  • After Failure

    Open Access•Aaron Ettinger•International Studies Review•2020

  • Strong-State Restraint as a Legitimation Strategy

    Open Access•Chin-Hao Huang•Foreign Policy Analysis•2023

  • The International Relations of East Asia

    Open Access•Rosemary Foot, Evelyn Goh•International Studies Review•2018

  • Domination for the Rest? Creating and Contesting Secondary State-Led International Hierarchies

    Open Access•Alexander M Hynd, David Connolly et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Status Orders

    Open Access•Pål Røren•International Studies Review•2024

  • The Dynamics of Global Power Politics

    Stacie E Goddard, Daniel H Nexon•Journal of Global Security Studies•2016

  • Regime Security and Regional Cooperation Among Weak States

    Atena Ştefania Feraru, Atena Ş Feraru•International Studies Review•2017

  • US Dominance and American Bias in International Relations Scholarship

    Open Access•Evelyn Goh•Journal of Global Security Studies•2019

  • The United States, China, and the Politics of Hegemonic Ordering in East Asia

    Open Access•Beverley Loke•International Studies Review•2021

  • Stigma, hierarchy, and the Eurozone

    Philip Giurlando•European Politics and Society•2021

  • China’s Rise and a New Perspective on Hegemonic Stability Theory

    Open Access•Nermin Amr•International Journal on Culture…•2025

  • Prabowo’s China Policy and Its Implications for Indonesia–Taiwan Relations

    Harryanto Aryodiguno•Issues & Studies•2026

  • Socializing states into a rules-based international order

    Open Access•Andrew Yeo, Ramon Pacheco Pardo•European Politics and Society•2026

  • Combinative Hedging

    Open Access•Yohanes Putra Suhito, I Gede Wahyu Wicaksana•Journal of Asian Security and…•2024

  • Role Conception of the Asia-Pacific Middle Powers

    Open Access•Moch Faisal Karim, Rona Nabila•Journal of Asian Security and…•2022

  • Political convergence between the EU and Asean

    Open Access•Aleš Karmazin, Guangyu Qiao-Franco et al.•Asia Europe Journal•2026

  • Systemic Change and Regional Orders

    Open Access•J Fulton•The International Spectator•2022

  • Reimagining East Asian multilateral cooperation in economy and security

    Open Access•Junghoon Lee•Asian Review of Political Economy•2026

  • Evaluating the effectiveness of China’s nation branding with data from social media

    Open Access•Lan He, Rongdang Wang et al.•Global Media and China•2020

  • S400s, sanctions and defiance

    Hüsna Taş Yetim, Ayşe Hazar•Journal of Southeast European and…•2023

  • Maritime politics as discourse in the Indo/Asia-Pacific

    Tim Summers•Territory Politics Governance•2021

  • Hierarchy in practice

    Open Access•Vincent Pouliot•European Journal of International…•2016

  • Understanding spheres of influence in international politics

    Open Access•Van Jackson•European Journal of International…•2019

  • The strategist’s dilemma

    Open Access•Hugo Meijer, Benjamin Jensen•European Journal of International…•2017

  • Northeast Asia's New ‘History Spiral’

    Open Access•Amy King, Brendan Taylor•Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies•2015

  • Vietnam's Emergence as a Middle Power in Asia

    Open Access•T Thuy•Journal of Current Southeast…•2022

  • Interpreting great power rights in international society

    Open Access•Benjamin Zala•Journal of International…•2020

  • Toward a differentiation-based framework for middle power behavior

    Open Access•Sarah Teo•International Theory•2021

  • Is anyone a middle power? The case for historicization

    Open Access•Jeffrey Robertson, Andrew Ossie Carr•International Theory•2023

  • The English School and postcolonial state agency

    Open Access•Robert Yates•International Theory•2020

  • The Authors Respond – Stacie Goddard

    Open Access•Stacie E Goddard•Journal of East Asian Studies•2020

  • Why Vietnam is not Balancing China

    Open Access•Xinru Ma, David C Kang•Journal of East Asian Studies•2023

  • The power of partnerships

    Open Access•David Capie•International Politics•2020

  • Iran and the regionalization of (in)security

    Open Access•Lubayna Fawcett•International Politics•2015

  • Japan, South Korea and the rise of a networked security architecture in East Asia

    Open Access•Matteo Dian•International Politics•2019

  • China’s rise and US hegemony

    Open Access•Rosemary Foot•International Politics•2019

  • The strategic value of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the consequences of abandoning it for the US role in Asia

    Open Access•Matteo Dian•International Politics•2017

  • Southeast Asian perspectives on regional alliance dynamics

    Open Access•Linda Quayle•International Politics•2019

  • Multilateralism and East Asian transitions

    Open Access•Alice D Ba•International Politics•2019

  • In response

    Open Access•Evelyn Goh•International Politics•2020

  • Regional powers, global aspirations

    Open Access•Lubayna Fawcett, Sharinee L Jagtiani•International Politics•2022

  • Networking hegemony

    Open Access•Matteo Dian, Hugo Meijer•International Politics•2019

  • Liberal hegemony, international order, and US foreign policy

    Open Access•Michael Mastanduno•The British Journal of Politics…•2018

  • The changing regional faces of peace

    Open Access•Lubayna Fawcett•Arms Control•2025

  • Building regional order

    Sarah Teo•Arms Control•2025

  • Who lost Ethiopia? The unmaking of an African anchor state and U.S. foreign policy

    Harry Verhoeven, Michael Woldemariam•Arms Control•2022

  • Lonely China, Popular United States

    Open Access•Sung Chul Jung•Pacific Focus•2018

  • The United States is a messianic state

    Open Access•Adarsh Badri•Australian Journal Of International…•2024

  • Beyond geopolitical fetishism

    Kanishka Jayasuriya•Australian Journal Of International…•2021

  • Taming Chinese power

    B He•Australian Journal Of International…•2021

  • Going global

    Christian Reus-Smit•Australian Journal Of International…•2021

  • Explaining Japan’s post-Cold War security policy trajectory

    Takuya Matsuda•Australian Journal Of International…•2020

  • A distinctive global pivotal state? The intra-hierarchical messaging of the ROK Indo-Pacific strategy

    David Connolly•Australian Journal Of International…•2024

  • Asia’s Lesser Powers Confront US–China Threat to the Regional Order

    T J Pempel•Issues & Studies•2020

  • Between a Rock and a Hard Place

    Brian L Job•Issues & Studies•2020

  • China’s rise in a liberal world order in transition – introduction to the Forum

    Open Access•Naná De Graaff, Tobias Ten Brink et al.•Review of International Political…•2020

  • Polarization among the Asean member states

    Arianto Christian Hartono, Nawalage S Cooray•South East Asia Research•2024

  • Contesting liberal internationalism

    Pak K Lee, Anisa Heritage et al.•Cambridge Review of International…•2020

  • The unintended consequences of US deep engagement in the South China Sea

    Chin-Hao Huang•Cambridge Review of International…•2022

  • Indonesia’s hedging plus policy in the face of China’s rise and the US-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific region

    Dewi Fortuna Anwar•The Pacific Review•2022

  • Asean’s constructed dichotomies

    Alice D Ba•The Pacific Review•2019

  • Bargaining interactions reconsidered

    Richard J Cook, Maximilian Ohle et al.•The Pacific Review•2019

  • India and order transition in the Indo-Pacific

    Open Access•Kate Sullivan De Estrada•The Pacific Review•2023

  • Adoption, accommodation or opposition? - regional powers respond to American-led Indo-Pacific strategy

    Thomas S Wilkins, Thomas Wilkins et al.•The Pacific Review•2020

  • Asean as the ‘regional conductor’

    Robert Yates•The Pacific Review•2016

  • Theorising the international relations of Asia

    Atanu Acharya, Amitav Acharya•The Pacific Review•2017

  • Contested Asia's ‘New’ multilateralism and regional order

    Nick Bisley•The Pacific Review•2018

  • Middle powers amid Sino-U.S. rivalry

    Sarah Teo•The Pacific Review•2022

  • Global IR through dialogue

    Eun Yong-Soo•The Pacific Review•2019

  • Power transitions and great power management

    Rosemary Foot•The Pacific Review•2017

  • Right target; wrong tactics

    T J Pempel•The Pacific Review•2019

  • Vietnam’s growing agency in the twenty-first century

    Thuy T Do, T Thuy•The Pacific Review•2021

  • Late Ottoman Order in India

    Open Access•Md Anisur Rahman, Ali Balci•Alternatives Global Local Political•2025

  • Status symbols in world politics

    Open Access•Paul Beaumont, Pål Røren•Cooperation and Conflict•2025

  • Face-work in East Asia’s Diplomatic Culture

    Open Access•Antoine Roth•East Asia•2025

  • East Asian Civilization and the Problem of Region Making

    Open Access•Oleg Pakhomov•Millennial Asia•2020

  • How the East Was Won

    Open Access•Andrew Phillips•How the East Was Won•2021

  • Indonesia’s New Partial Multialignment Strategy

    Open Access•I Gede Wahyu Wicaksana, Probo Darono Yakti•TRaNS Trans -Regional and…•2025

  • China’s rise, the USA and global order

    Open Access•Mohammed Nuruzzaman•International Area Studies Review•2016

  • Hegemonic orders and the idea of history

    Open Access•Aaron C Mckeil•International Politics•2023

  • What Watson can teach us about war and order

    Open Access•Charlotta Friedner Parrat•International Politics•2024

  • Who fears which great power? Symmetric and asymmetric threat perceptions in East Asia

    Open Access•Kiyoung Chang, Jeeyoung Park•Research & Politics•2026

  • Asian security roles in a recalibrating gulf

    Sreshtha Chakraborty•Global Change Peace & Security•2026

  • China’s global health governance in Africa before Covid-19

    Open Access•Igor Sevenard, Richard J Cook•Journal of International…•2026

  • “Hedging” and “Context Analysis” in Malaysian Foreign Relations

    Open Access•Anthony Milner•Pacific Affairs•2026

  • Security expertise and international hierarchy

    Open Access•Björn Jerdén•Review of International Studies•2017

  • Informal imposed hierarchies in world politics and internal instabilities in subordinate states

    Hüsna Taş Yetim•Third World Quarterly•2023

  • Pulled East. The rise of China, Europe and French security policy in the Asia-Pacific

    Hugo Meijer•Journal of Strategic Studies•2023

  • International Order in Historical East Asia

    Open Access•David C Kang•International Organization•2020

  • Soft Balancing, Binding or Bandwagoning? Understanding Institutional Responses to Power Disparities in the Americas

    Open Access•Laura Levick, Carsten-Andreas Schulz•Canadian Journal of Political…•2020

  • The art of hedging

    Open Access•Ali Bakir, Nayef Nahar Al-Shamari et al.•Third World Quarterly•2025

  • China-US competition in Africa

    Falin Zhang, Ming Yang et al.•The Pacific Review•2026

Unique citing works121
Citations per year11
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 121

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae