Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Conservatism in human information processing

Dados Bibliográficos

ID20042262
AutoresWard Edwards (University of Southern California, autor correspondente)
Ano1982
Páginas359-369
Data de publicação1982-04-30
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoCHAPTER
PeriódicoJudgment under uncertainty (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditoraCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/cbo9780511809477.026
OpenAlexW2990384283
ISBN9780511809477
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas92

An abundance of research has shown that human beings are conservative processors of fallible information. Such experiments compare human behavior with the outputs of Bayes's theorem, the formally optimal rule about how opinions (that is, probabilities) should be revised on the basis of new information. It turns out that opinion change is very orderly, and usually proportional to numbers calculated from Bayes's theorem – but it is insufficient in amount. A convenient first approximation to the data would say that it takes anywhere from two to five observations to do one observation's worth of work in inducing a subject to change his opinions. A number of experiments have been aimed at an explanation for this phenomenon. They show that a major, probably the major, cause of conservatism is human misaggregation of the data. That is, men perceive each datum accurately and are well aware of its individual diagnostic meaning, but are unable to combine its diagnostic meaning well with the diagnostic meaning of other data when revising their opinions

Bayes' theorem · Bayesian probability · Cartography · Conservatism · Econometrics · Epistemology · Geodetic datum · Geography · Meaning (existential) · Phenomenon · Political science · Subject (documents) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Mathematics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Board ethnic diversity, director age and firm value

    Open Access•Eunho Cho, Mohammad Hashemi Joo et al.•Equal Opportunities International•2025

  • Financial Markets and the State

    Roman Frydman, Michael D Goldberg et al.•Capitalism and Society•2009

  • On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2015

  • Ignorância moral e o papel das virtudes

    Open Access•Denis Coitinho•ethic@ - An international Journal…•2020

  • Architecture of the mind and libertarian paternalism

    Open Access•Riccardo Viale•Mind & Society•2019

  • Subjective expectations in the context of HIV/Aids in Malawi

    Open Access•Adeline Delavande, Hans‐peter Kohler et al.•Demographic Research•2009

  • Bounded Rationality

    Bryan D Jones•Annual Review of Political Science•1999

  • Overconfident Investors, Predictable Returns, and Excessive Trading

    Open Access•Kent Daniel, David Hirshleifer•The Journal of Economic…•2015

  • The Effect of Experience on Context‐dependent Decisions

    Open Access•Eyal Ert, Tomás Lejarraga•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2018

  • Information seeking on Bayesian conditional probability problems

    Open Access•Christopher R Wolfe•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1995

  • Exploiting the Wisdom of Others to Make Better Decisions

    Open Access•Ilan Yaniv, Shoham Choshen-Hillel et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2011

  • Conceptual conservatism

    Open Access•Moti Nissani•The Social Science Journal•1994

  • Risk taking and information aggregation in groups

    Open Access•Spiros Bougheas, Jeroen Nieboer et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2015

  • How do loan officers make their decisions about credit risks? A study of parallel distributed processing

    Open Access•W Rodgers•Journal of Economic Psychology•1991

  • Biases in belief reports

    Open Access•Dominik Folli, Irenaeus Wolff•Journal of Economic Psychology•2022

  • Representativeness in Foreign Policy Judgments

    Robert Jervis•Political Psychology•1986

  • Pourquoi une sociologie compréhensive augmentée

    Gérald Bronner•L Année sociologique•2020

  • Improving inference for social research and social policy

    Open Access•James Fennessey•Social Science Research•1977

  • The trouble with overconfidence

    Dward A Moore, Don A Moore et al.•Psychological Review•2008

  • How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction

    Gerd Gigerenzer, Ulrich Hoffrage•Psychological Review•1995

  • Some Fundamental Problems in Experimental Psychology

    Open Access•A C Pereboom•Psychological Reports•1971

  • Beyond discrete biases

    Robin M Hogarth•Psychological Bulletin•1981

  • Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases

    M Hilbert•Psychological Bulletin•2012

  • Belief in the law of small numbers

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Psychological Bulletin•1971

  • Stereotyping

    Clark Mccauley, Christopher L Stitt et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1980

  • Weak inference with linear models

    Norman H Anderson, James Shanteau•Psychological Bulletin•1977

  • Judging probable cause

    Hillel J Einhorn, Robin M Hogarth•Psychological Bulletin•1986

  • A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes

    Icek Ajzen, Martin Fishbein•Psychological Bulletin•1975

  • Partisan Bias and the Bayesian Ideal in the Study of Public Opinion

    John G Bullock•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Economic Conditions and Party Competence

    Mark Peffley, Stanley Feldman et al.•The Journal of Politics•1987

  • The "same person" heuristic

    Charles G Lord, Daniel T Gilbert•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • Falsifiability is not optional

    Etienne P Lebel, Derek Berger et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2017

  • Specious learning about reward and punishment

    Paul E Schaffner, Paul Schaffner•Journal of Personality and Social…•1985

  • Evaluations and Expectations

    Martha Foschi, Ricardo Foschi et al.•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1976

  • When guessing what another person would say is better than giving your own opinion

    Open Access•Ilan Yaniv, Shoham Choshen-Hillel•Journal of Experimental Social…•2012

  • Rational and nonrational elements in reactions to disconfirmation of performance expectancies

    Open Access•Philip Brickman•Journal of Experimental Social…•1972

  • Illusions of efficacy

    Open Access•Norbert L Kerr•Journal of Experimental Social…•1989

  • Strategic Deception and Counterdeception

    Richards J Heuer•International Studies Quarterly•1981

  • Preference Falsification, Policy Continuity and Collective Conservatism

    Timur Kuran•The Economic Journal•1987

  • Information Aggregation with Random Ordering

    Open Access•Markus Nöth, Martin Weber•The Economic Journal•2003

  • Judgment under Uncertainty

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Utility, Probability, and Human…•1975

  • Unsettled Thoughts

    Julia Staffel•Unsettled Thoughts•2019

  • Processing Linguistic Probabilities

    David V Budescu, Thomas S Wallsten•Decision Making from a Cognitive…•1995

  • The Role of Probabilistic and Syllogistic Reasoning in Cognitive Organization and Social Inference

    Robert S Wyer•Human judgment and decision…•1975

  • Cognitive Approaches to Judgment and Decision Making

    Reid Hastie, Nancy Pennington•Decision Making from a Cognitive…•1995

  • On the Perception of Social Consensus

    Joachim Krueger, Joachim I Krueger•Advances in Experimental Social…•1998

  • Integrating Verbal Information

    Melvin Manis, Marjorie B Platt•Human judgment and decision…•1975

  • Cognitive Algebra

    Norman H Anderson•Advances in Experimental Social…•1974

  • A model of investor sentiment1We are grateful to the NSF for financial support, and to Oliver Blanchard, Alon Brav, John Campbell (a referee), John Cochrane, Edward Glaeser, J.B. Heaton, Danny Kahneman, David Laibson, Owen Lamont, Drazen Prelec, Jay Ritter (a referee), Ken Singleton, Dick Thaler, an anonymous referee, and the editor, Bill Schwert, for comments.1

    Open Access•Nicholas Barberis, Andrei Shleifer et al.•Journal of Financial Economics•1998

  • The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence

    Open Access•Dale W Griffin, Dale Griffin et al.•Cognitive Psychology•1992

  • The priority heuristic

    Eduard Brandstätter, Gerd Gigerenzer et al.•Psychological Review•2006

  • Bias in judgment

    Norbert L Kerr, Robert J Maccoun et al.•Psychological Review•1996

  • Confidence in judgment

    Hillel J Einhorn, Robin M Hogarth•Psychological Review•1978

  • Attention web designers

    Gitte Lindgaard, Gary Fernandes et al.•Behaviour and Information…•2006

  • Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective.

    Baruch Fischhoff, Ruth Beyth-Marom et al.•Psychological Review•1983

  • Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment

    Open Access•Paul Slovic, Sarah Lichtenstein•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1971

  • Subjective probability

    Open Access•Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Cognitive Psychology•1972

  • Order effects in belief updating

    Open Access•Robin M Hogarth, Hillel J Einhorn•Cognitive Psychology•1992

  • The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments

    Open Access•Maya Bar-Hillel, Maya Bar‐Hillel•Acta Psychologica•1980

  • Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference.

    Hillel J Einhorn, Robin M Hogarth•Psychological Review•1985

  • Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases

    Open Access•Jörg Oechssler, Andreas Roider et al.•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2009

  • Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.

    Joshua Klayman, Young-Won Ha•Psychological Review•1987

  • Models of ecological rationality

    Daniel G Goldstein, Gerd Gigerenzer•Psychological Review•2002

  • The base rate fallacy reconsidered

    Open Access•Jonathan J Koehler•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1996

  • A Theory Of Irrationality As A ‘Reasonable’ Response To An Incomplete Specification

    Open Access•Robyn M Dawes•Synthese•2000

  • Rational Polarization

    Open Access•Kevin Dorst•SSRN Electronic Journal•2021

  • The Paradox of Help Seeking in the Entropy Mastermind Game

    Open Access•Nichola Taylor, Matthias Hofer et al.•Frontiers in Education•2020

  • Pandemic Shocks and Household Spending

    Open Access•David Finck, PETER TILLMANN•Oxford Bulletin of Economics and…•2022

  • Explicating Exact versus Conceptual Replication

    Open Access•Robert Hudson•Erkenntnis•2023

  • Measuring the global economic impact of the coronavirus outbreak

    Open Access•Waël Louhichi, Lisa Dawn Hamilton et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Oversampling of minority categories drives misperceptions of group compositions

    Open Access•Mel Win Khaw, Rachel Kranton et al.•Cognition•2021

  • A description–experience gap in statistical intuitions

    Open Access•Christin Schulze, Ralph Hertwig•Cognition•2021

  • Updating without evidence

    Open Access•Yoaav Isaacs, Jack S Russell•Noûs•2023

  • Quality of quality

    Open Access•Barbara Befani•Evaluation•2020

  • Judgemental adjustment of initial forecasts

    Open Access•Joa Sang Lim, Marcus O’Connor•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1995

  • The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings

    Lee Ross•Advances in Experimental Social…•1977

  • Social Judgment Theory

    Kenneth R Hammond, Thomas R Stewart et al.•Human judgment and decision…•1975

  • Domain-specific reasoning

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer, Klaus Hug•Cognition•1992

  • Learning from Polls During Electoral Campaigns

    Open Access•Lukas F Stoetzer, Lucas Leemann et al.•Political Behavior•2024

  • The interpretation of uncertainty in ecological rationality

    Open Access•Anastasia Kozyreva, Ralph Hertwig•Synthese•2021

  • The psychology and rationality of decisions from experience

    Open Access•Ralph Hertwig•Synthese•2012

  • Strength of belief and risk

    Open Access•Lennart Sj ber, Lennart Sj�ber•Policy Sciences•1979

  • Bayesian inference

    Michael H Birnbaum, Barbara A Mellers•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

  • The Nuclear Arms Race

    Open Access•Plou, Scott Plous•Journal of Peace Research•1993

  • A Conflict Model for Strategists and Managers

    Open Access•Gregory B Markus, Raymond Tanter•American Behavioral Scientist•1972

  • Integration theory and attitude change

    Norman H Anderson•Psychological Review•1971

  • Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data

    Open Access•Matthew B Miles, A Michael Huberman•Educational Researcher•1984

  • Rational Polarization

    Kevin Dorst•The Philosophical Review•2023

  • Errors in probability updating behaviour

    Open Access•Hans Ouwersloot, Peter Nijkamp et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•1998

  • Public service users’ responses to performance information

    Open Access•Peter Rasmussen Damgaard, Oliver James•Journal of Public Administration…•2024

  • The Bias‐and‐Expertise Model

    Open Access•David J Young, Lee De‐wit et al.•Cognitive Science•2025

  • Endogenous Beliefs in Models of Politics

    Open Access•William Minozzi•American Journal of Political…•2013

Obras citantes distintas92
Citações por ano1,67
Intervalo de citações1971 - 2025 (55)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 52
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae