What about the others
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20071812 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Singleton (0000-0002-6065-1521, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Pages | 109-115 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-11 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | For a New Classic Sociology (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Routledge India (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4324/9781003097853-18 |
| OpenAlex | W3082634746 |
| ISBN | 9781003097853 |
| Language | EN |
The credibility of any concrete reorganization of the crops actually grown in the cultural field of knowledge as it is partitioned and practised in the West depends on the people knowing what “knowing” as such is epistemologically and what it happens to be ethnologically. The illusion of substantial transcultural sameness just detected in people instinctive understanding of book-based disciplines such as (theoretical) sociology, (un)consciously rears its imperialistic head when the library happens to be a human. Before graciously allotting anthropologists a slot in their reprogramming of the academic scene, it behoves sociologists to declare the human logic to which their program is beholden. It echoes Beattie’s Other Cultures, the people unofficial manual at the Oxford’s Institute of Social Anthropology where the author studied and was privileged to perform as Evans-Pritichard’s assistant in the 1960s. Beyond and above intra-disciplinary reform or interdisciplinary revolution, without a strong dose evolutionary indiscipline institutions and ideologies inevitably come to a grinding halt
Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Computer Science · Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture
| Highly cited | No |
|---|