Raw Material and Retouched Flakes

Bibliographic Data

ID20085927
AuthorsAndrew P Bradbury, Philip J Carr (0000-0001-5762-9828), D Randall Cooper
Year2008
Pages233-254
Publication date2008-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueLithic Technology (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/cbo9780511499661.012
OpenAlexW1560738144
ISBN9780511499661
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited24

Lithic analysts are often criticized for not engaging in theory building and for conducting particularistic studies. Such particularistic studies can be linked to theory through an organization-of-technology approach, which has great promise. However, concepts often employed in the approach, such as curation, need further refinement to become operationalized. One way to accomplish this for flake tools is to develop a method for measuring the amount of tool resharpening. One method is to determine the original flake mass and compare this to the mass of the recovered tool to determine the amount of realized use life. Here, a series of experiments in producing retouched flakes using various raw materials and two reduction modes were conducted by two flintknappers to determine how these variables influence the prediction of flake mass. Analysis indicates that raw material type is important for estimating original flake mass, but a tripartite division of quality may be sufficient to account for the variation. No significant differences are evident between the two knappers. Equations used to calculate original flake mass from retouched flakes must be derived with a consideration of raw material

Composite material · Flake · Operationalization · Physics · Raw data · Raw material · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Chemistry · Computer Science · Materials Science · Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub