Civic Psychological Safety
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20141937 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catalina Carpan (0000-0001-5794-3067, Department of Politics and International Studies University of Warwick Coventry UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theoria (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/theo.70038 |
| OpenAlex | W4414296099 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
This paper examines democratic contestation—the right of citizens to challenge norms and hold authorities accountable—as a vital element of both republican and liberal egalitarian democracy. Despite formal rights to contest, marginalised groups often face perception‐based costs, including fears of violence, legal repercussions and social stigma, which create a coercive double bind that forces them to choose between civic engagement and personal safety. Using three case studies—African Americans in ‘Black Lives Matter’ protests, Indigenous climate activists and British Muslims in the United Kingdom—this paper demonstrates how these costs silence marginalised voices and obstruct meaningful democratic participation. The paper critiques traditional theories of democratic contestation, highlighting that existing frameworks by theorists such as Philip Pettit, Miranda Fricker, Iris Marion Young and Nancy Fraser inadequately address these perception‐based barriers. To fill this gap, the paper introduces civic psychological safety as a crucial condition for democratic engagement, proposing that the state must ensure citizens can contest without fear of repercussion. Concrete policy recommendations—such as transparent policing, legal protections and an increased role for lived experience in Equality Impact Assessments—are suggested to foster an inclusive democracy where all citizens, especially marginalised groups, can engage in contestation without intimidation or risk
Civic engagement · CONTEST · Democracy · Face (sociological concept) · Indigenous · Intimidation · Silence · State (computer science) · Community Health and Development · Resilience and Mental Health · Social and Intergroup Psychology
Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex
Knowledge Exchange and Combination
Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice
A Theory of Justice
Participation and Democratic Theory
ONE. The Liberalism of Fear
Liberalism and the Moral Life
Inclusion and Democracy
Public Philosophy in a New Key
Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory
Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance
Frontiers of Justice
Psychological Safety
Police Don't Like Black People”
Innovation is not enough
The aftermath
Unpacking the crackdown on Palestine solidarity activism in the UK in a post-7 October reality
Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom
Politicization of the Criminal Offender
Police Disrespect Toward the Public
Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts
The New Jim Crow
Should Contractualists Decompose
Political Intolerance in the USSR
The Continuing Significance of Race
Political Consequences of the Carceral State
Between Facts and Norms
Performing Mass Murder
Misrepresenting Reproductive Justice
I can't breathe
If I Wanted to Have More Opportunities and Go to a Better School, I Just Had to Get Used to It
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |