Idealism and Scepticism
A Reply to B rueckner
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20142230 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen Puryear (0000-0002-4517-005X, North Carolina State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 290-293 |
| Publication date | 2013-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theoria (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-2567.2012.01145.x |
| OpenAlex | W1561283549 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Anthony B rueckner argues that B erkeleyan idealism lacks anti‐sceptical force because of the way B erkeley draws the appearance/reality distinction. But B rueckner's case rests on a misunderstanding of B erkeley's view. Properly understood, B erkeleyan idealism does indeed have anti‐sceptical force
Epistemology · Idealism · Skepticism · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Historical Philosophy and Science · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|