Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Logical Analysis of Pluralistic Ignorance

Bibliographic Data

ID20142671
AuthorsJie Fan (0000-0003-2441-5019, School of Humanities University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China, corresponding author), Mingzheng Lu (School of Philosophy Beijing Normal University Beijing China), Guanghui Liu (0000-0002-3760-0785, School of Philosophy Shanxi University Taiyuan China)
Year2026
Publication date2026-04-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheoria (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/theo.70082
OpenAlexW7154031409
LanguageEN
References cited14

In this paper, we give a logical analysis of pluralistic ignorance, which is an important social phenomenon. There has been no consensus about the definition of pluralistic ignorance in the literature. From an epistemic point of view, there are at least three definitions of pluralistic ignorance. We choose three definitions among them, which, for us, are natural to explain many classic examples of phenomenon of pluralistic ignorance in the literature of social and behavioural sciences, e.g., (American) college campuses, The Emperor's New Clothes. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no logical study on the three definitions of pluralistic ignorance yet. We take the three operators of pluralistic ignorance induced by the definitions as first‐class citizens and investigate their logical properties, including the similarities, differences and the interactions, where we find some interesting results; in particular, under the assumption that beliefs are consistent and negatively introspective, a group cannot be second‐order pluralistically ignorant, and thus not be any higher order pluralistically ignorant. This contrasts with Fitch's result in “Ignorance of ignorance” (Kit Fine, Synthese , 2018) that under the same assumption, one may be second‐order ignorant, even though under the assumption of the modal system S4 (semantically, the class of transitive and reflexive frames), one cannot know that one is second‐order ignorant

Ignorance · Logical conjunction · Phenomenon · Reflexivity · Social phenomenon · Transitive relation · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

  • Theory and problems of social psychology.

    David Krech, Richard S Crutchfield•1948

  • Pluralistic ignorance in the bystander effect

    Open Access•Rasmus K Rendsvig•Synthese•2014

  • Ignorance of ignorance

    Open Access•Kit Fine•Synthese•2018

  • On the rationality of pluralistic ignorance

    Open Access•Jens Christian Bjerring, Jens Ulrik Hansen et al.•Synthese•2014

  • The discovery of pluralistic ignorance

    Open Access•Hubert J O'Gorman•Journal of the History of the…•1986

  • Pluralistic ignorance

    Dale T Miller, Cathy Mcfarland•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

  • Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus

    Deborah A Prentice, Dale T Miller•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • Learning from the Behavior of Others

    Open Access•Sushil Bikhchandani, David Hirshleifer et al.•The Journal of Economic…•1998

  • Who's Going to Make the First Move? Pluralistic Ignorance as an Impediment to Relationship Formation

    Open Access•Jacquie D Vorauer, Rebecca K Ratner•Journal of Social and Personal…•1996

  • The Emperor's Dilemma

    Damon Centola, R Willer et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae