Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Safety, Sensitivity and “Distant” Epistemic Luck

Bibliographic Data

ID20142929
AuthorsWolfgang Freitag (0000-0002-7740-5298, Heidelberg University, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume80
Issue1
Pages44-61
Publication date2014-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheoria (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/theo.12011
OpenAlexW1548594005
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited21

Prominent instances of anti‐luck epistemology, in particular sensitivity and safety accounts of knowledge, introduce a modal condition on the pertinent belief in terms of closeness or similarity of possible worlds. Very roughly speaking, a belief must continue to be true in close possibilities in order to qualify as knowledge. Such closeness‐accounts derive much support from their (alleged) ability to eliminate standard instances of epistemic luck as they appear in prominent Gettier‐type examples. The article argues that there are new Gettier‐type examples which are grounded in “distant” epistemic luck. It is demonstrated that sensitivity and safety theories cannot handle such examples

Closeness · Economics · Epistemology · Luck · Metaphysics · Order (exchange) · Sensitivity (control systems) · Similarity (geometry) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Free Will and Agency · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Where Epistemic Safety Fails

    Open Access•M A Dacela•Kritike An Online Journal of…•2020

  • Horizon

    Open Access•Paolo Bolaños•Kritike An Online Journal of…•2020

  • Safety and Unawareness of Error-Possibility

    Haicheng Zhao•Philosophical Papers•2021

  • Distance from Safety! A Reply to Broncano‐Berrocal's “No Luck in the Distance”

    Open Access•Wolfgang Freitag•Theoria•2016

  • No Luck in the Distance

    Open Access•Fernando Broncano-Berrocal, Fernando Broncano‐Berrocal•Theoria•2016

  • Re‐examining the ancient roots of the concept of intellectual virtue

    Open Access•Alkis Kotsonis•Theoria•2025

  • Better virtuous than safe

    Open Access•Haicheng Zhao•Synthese•2021

  • Knowledge without safety

    Open Access•Haicheng Zhao•Synthese•2020

  • I Know. Modal Epistemology and Scepticism

    Peter Baumann•The Philosophical Quarterly•2014

  • Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge

    Alvin I Goldman•The Journal of Philosophy•1976

  • Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology

    Duncan Pritchard, Inc Journal of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•2012

  • Safety-Based Epistemology

    Duncan Pritchard, Philosophy Documentation Center•Journal of Philosophical Research•2009

  • The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism

    John Greco•The Oxford handbook of philosophy…•2008

  • Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification

    Robert J Fogelin•Pyrrhonian reflections on…•1994

  • A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals

    Jonathan Bennett, Jonathan Francis Bennett•A philosophical guide to…•2003

  • Safety and epistemic luck

    Open Access•Avram Hiller, Ram Neta•Synthese•2007

  • Unsafe Knowledge

    Open Access•Juan Comesaña•Synthese•2005

  • Anti-luck epistemology

    Open Access•Duncan Pritchard•Synthese•2007

  • Philosophical Explanations

    Robert Nozick•Philosophical Explanations•2006

  • The Inescapability of Gettier Problems

    Linda Zagzebski•The Philosophical Quarterly•1994

  • Pritchard's Epistemic Luck

    Jennifer Lackey•The Philosophical Quarterly•2006

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,75
Citation span2014 - 2025 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae