Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Non sum Oedipus, sed Morus

A Paper on the Portrait of Sir Thomas More and his Family

Bibliographic Data

ID20146281
AuthorsFrank Mitjans (corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume43 & 44 (Number
Issue4 & 1-2
Pages12-67
Publication date2007-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMoreana (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0047-8105 • E-ISSN: 2398-4961
PublisherEdinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3366/more.2007.43-44.4_1-2.4
OpenAlexW2549566492
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Frank Mitjans is an architect who has worked in London since 1976. He was introduced to the significance of the figure of St. Thomas More by Andrés Vázquez de Prada (1923-2005), author of the biography, Sir Tomás Moro, Lord Canciller de Inglaterra (Madrid, 1962). In 1977 Vázquez de Prada invited Mitjans to visit with him the Thomas More Exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery, which stimulated his interest in representations of More, his family and his friends. Since August 2002 he has given many presentations and talks on the topography of More’s London to groups of students and other interested people in Britain, Ireland, and Sweden. Frank Mitjans, architecte qui travaille à Londres depuis 1976, fut initié au personnage de Saint Thomas More par Andrés Vázquez de Prada (1923-2003), auteur de la biographie Sir Tomás Moro, Lord Canciller de Inglaterra (Madrid, 1962). En 1977 Vázquez de Prada l’invita à l’accompagner dans sa visite de l’exposition Thomas More à la National Portrait Gallery, évènement qui aiguisa son intérêt pour les représentations de More, de sa famille et de ses amis. Depuis août 2002 il a régulièrement fait des présentations et des exposés à des groupes d’étudiants et d’autres en Grande-Bretagne, Irlande et Suède au sujet de la topographie du Londres de Thomas More. The recent exhibitions of the works of Holbein in London and Basel (2006-2007), and scholarly publications such as Holbein and England (2004), have rekindled interest in the Portrait of Thomas More and his Family, and in the late sixteenth-century versions of Holbein’s presumed lost original. The present paper analyses the differences between the sixteenth-century versions and Holbein’s 1527 composition sketch, and concludes that the sketch is a more reliable witness to Holbein’s lost painting than the later versions, as well as the only authentic witness to More’s intentions; though anything we learn from the drawing must be checked against what we know from More’s letters and writings and other biographical data. From the later versions, however, and in particular from the references to Seneca on them, we can learn about those who commissioned them and England’s peculiar historical circumstances

Art · Art history · Biography · Exhibition · Humanities · Portrait · Architecture and Art History Studies · Historical and Architectural Studies · Renaissance Literature and Culture

  • The Date of Birth of Thomas More

    Open Access•Frank Mitjans•Moreana•2010

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,06
Citation span2010 - 2010 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae