Deconstruction, literature and ideology

This paper attempts to show how deconstruction is liable to misunderstanding and non recognition (especially in South Africa and in the USA) because of the fact that it is divorced from its materialist base and because of the failure to understand it as essentially a critique of Western metaphysics, as a deconstruction of (Hegelian) idealism in all its ramifications, and not of texts as such. When texts are read/written, they are used to illustrate concepts and to unearth codes of society structured by ideology. Thus The Theory of the Text, in fact, necessitates a sociology of literature. The deconstructionist needs to know exactly what he or she is trying to escape from and needs to make visible the hidden ideologies and thereby supplying intertextually validated alternative interpretations. This is allowed for by Barthes, but Barthes did not bother to undertake it, thus ignoring a central discovery of the Bakhtin school: that the ideological nature of meaning implies that the sign, when used, is always a site of struggle, whether one is aware of it or not

Aesthetics · Epistemology · Hegelianism · Idealism · Ideology · Materialism · Metaphysics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Literature and Cultural Memory · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies

• Derivean reading ‐ a critique of deconstructive criticism

  Open Access•Wilhelm Liebenberg•Journal of Literary Studies•1987

  Add to list

• Dissemination

  Jacques Derrida, Barbara Johnson•Dissemination•1981

  Add to list