Two Distant Feminist Standpoints in Nineteenth-Century India

Modern feminist theory endeavours to explain gender inequality in terms of gender politics, power hierarchies and sexuality. In this endeavour, it has come to the crossroads with a variety of theoretical and philosophical domains. It dynamically deals with multiple domains such as sociology, history, anthropology, economics, philosophy, psychoanalysis and literary criticism. Standpoint epistemology has been applied by gender scholars to highlight the intersectional issues in feminist theory. In the present article, two different feminist standpoints in the nineteenth-century India have been discussed. Feminist ideologies of Savitribai Phule, a low-caste Hindu woman, and Pandita Ramabai, a high-caste Hindu widow, have been compared. Their thoughts and writings on diverse gender issues such as education, self-reliance, child marriage, widow remarriage and choice marriage have been examined. Since both the leaders are from different backgrounds at the individual, interactional and macro levels, efforts have been made to understand their standpoints. By tackling two different standpoints, it has been embarked upon to contribute to a critical gender scholarship leading to a better social understanding

Caste · Feminism · Feminist theory · Hinduism · Human sexuality · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Remarriage · Scholarship · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Law · Philosophy · Religious studies · South Asian Cinema and Culture

• Caste, Conflict and Ideology

  Open Access•Rosalind O’hanlon, Rosalind O'Hanlon•Caste, Conflict and Ideology•1985

  Add to list

• Handbook of the Sociology of Gender

  Open Access•Barbara J Risman, Carissa M Froyum et al.•Handbook of the Sociology of Gender•2018

  Add to list

• The Indian Historical Review

  Open Access•Ravinder Kumar, Vivekanand Jha•South Asian Survey•1995

  Add to list