Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Imperial Control and the Translation Project

Appropriation of Medieval Sources in British Writings on India

Bibliographic Data

ID20179847
AuthorsShivangini Tandon (University of Delhi, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume41
Issue2
Pages223-233
Publication date2014-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIndian Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0376-9836 • E-ISSN: 0975-5977
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0376983614544828
OpenAlexW2333455869
LanguageEN
References cited14

This article explores the monumental translation project undertaken by H.M. Elliot and John Dowson in their work The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians: The Muhammadan Period (1867–77) consisting of eight volumes. It examines how Elliot and Dowson’s magnum opus facilitated the project of imperial domination and what were the exclusions and silences that marked this project of translation. The imperial historians or administrators treated the project of history writing as a device of imperial control. The history that they wrote was imbued with an element of essentialism that served to demarcate the subject population from the rulers and hence create structures of hierarchy. Their attempt was to classify or label people into neat categories differentiated on the basis of class, caste and religious affiliations which were essential to impose order and discipline on the subject population. All this required a construction of the past of the ruled, steeped in historical evidence within a positivist empiricist frame of reference. This kind of historical reconstruction was undertaken with the objective of legitimating the imperial control and proclaiming its racial superiority as well as lending history an element of objectivity. A careful scrutiny would also be done of the issues of language, power, discourse and the system of equivalences and their role in the translation project to fulfil one’s own political objectives

Essentialism · Imperial unit system · Political science · Politics · Population · Scrutiny · Sociology · Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies · Demography · Gender Studies · History · Law · Philippine History and Culture · Race, History, and American Society

  • The Past Before Us

    Michael Kammen•The Past Before Us•1982

  • Language, history, and class

    P J Corfield•Language, history, and class•1991

  • The Delhi Sultanate

    Peter Jackson•The Delhi Sultanate•1999

  • The History of India, as Told by its Own Historians

    Open Access•Henry Miers Elliot, John Dowson•History of India, As Told by Its…•2013

  • Castes of Mind

    Nicholas B Dirks•Castes of Mind•2011

  • Work and Revolution in France

    Michael P Hanagan, Michael Hanagan et al.•The American Historical Review•1981

  • Beyond the Cultural Turn

    Hayden V White, Caroline Bynum et al.•Beyond the Cultural Turn•1999

  • The Enlightenment

    Open Access•Dorinda Outram•The Enlightenment•2013

  • The New Cultural History

    Lynn Hunt•The New cultural history•1989

  • Theories of Discourse

    Ken Hirschkop, Diane Macdonell•Poetics Today•1987

  • Checking the Evidence

    Carlo Ginzburg•Critical Inquiry•1991

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae