The Adoption Of Gasb 34 In Small, Rural, Local Governments
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20201113 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patricia A Patrick (0000-0001-5101-6967, Shippensburg University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 227-249 |
| Publication date | 2010-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1096-3367 • E-ISSN: 1945-1814 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jpbafm-22-02-2010-b004 |
| OpenAlex | W2771180526 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 19 |
In June 1999, the Government Accounting Standards Board issued Government Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34 - Basic Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis for State and Local Governments (GASB 34) to improve the transparency and accountability of governments. This study examines the adoption of GASB 34 in local governments where the state government does not mandate GAAPcompliant financial reporting. The findings show low adoption rates among small, rural, local governments and high adoption rates among large, urban, local governments. Factors such as occupational specialization, government type, and a history of GAAP-compliant financial reporting are positively associated with adoption
Accountability · Accounting information system · Audit · Business · Financial accounting · Financial management · Financial statement · Fund accounting · Governmental accounting · Local government · Mandate · Political science · Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance · Corporate Taxation and Avoidance · Financial Reporting and XBRL · Public Administration · Accounting · Finance
Organizational Innovation
Shaping State‐based Financial Policy in an Era of Chance
The New Public Service
From Responsiveness to Collaboration
Local Government Benchmarking
Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement
The Government Performance and Results Act and the Tradition of Federal Management Reform
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,22 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2020 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |