Nonprofit lobby expense reporting
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20201713 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erica Harris (0009-0007-8559-5785, Villanova University), Erica E Harris, Ryan D Leece (0000-0003-3908-2894, University of Alabama at Birmingham), Daniel G Neely (0000-0002-7984-9765, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 522-553 |
| Publication date | 2017-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1096-3367 • E-ISSN: 1945-1814 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jpbafm-29-04-2017-b004 |
| OpenAlex | W2804061371 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 22 |
We investigate the determinants and consequences of nonprofit lobbying activity by analyzing 501(c)(3) nonprofit lobbying choices as reported on the primary tax form, Form 990. Under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), nonprofits may lose their tax exempt status if they engage in a substantial amount of lobbying. We examine lobbying choices across three dimensions: (1) the test used to determine whether lobbying activities are substantial (i.e., making an H-election) (2) whether lobbying activities are directly related to the mission of the nonprofit (i.e., program related) (3) whether an affiliate nonprofit lobbies on behalf of a nonprofit. Results indicate lobbying choices are associated with the amount of lobbying reported and the amount of contributions received. Additionally, our results provide some evidence that nonprofit lobbying choices allowed under the IRC are underutilized
Business · Economics · Internal revenue · Nonprofit Sector · Political science · Public economics · Revenue · Tax revenue · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Accounting · Marketing
| Citations per year | 0.13 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |