“Not stones but men”
Publics and pedagogy in Shakespeare’s Roman plays
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20253545 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Claire Hansen (0000-0001-7757-9047, The University of Sydney, corresponding author) |
| Editors | Kate Flaherty (0000-0003-1495-1782) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1235854 |
| Publication date | 2016-12-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cogent Arts and Humanities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2331-1983 • E-ISSN: 2331-1983 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23311983.2016.1235854 |
| OpenAlex | W2534030263 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
This essay utilises the representation of publics in William Shakespeare’s Roman plays to reflect on Shakespearean pedagogy and questions of public value. Through the use of a complexivist framework, this essay demonstrates how distinct areas of enquiry—the publics of Shakespeare’s Roman plays and pedagogical theory—can usefully illuminate each other and reflect on questions of Shakespeare as a public good. Peripheral publics in Titus Andronicus supply a model for transmission-style pedagogical frameworks; the publics of Julius Caesar and the networks of Antony and Cleopatra demonstrate the complexity of educational systems; and, finally, the representation of the people in Coriolanus interrogates the conceptualisation of the public and problematises notions of public value in Shakespeare and in higher education
Aesthetics · Art · Cleopatra · Drama · Epistemology · Literature · Political science · Public value · Publics · Sociology · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Law · Philosophy · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Theatre and Performance Studies
Theory in practice
The Figure of the Crowd in Early Modern London
Social Self-Organization
The Figure of the Crowd in Early Modern London
Shakespeare and the Popular Voice
A pattern, precedent, and lively warrant”
Complexity and Relations
Educational Philosophy and the Challenge of Complexity Theory
Complexity and post-modernism
Publics and Counterpublics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|