Multiple movement dependencies and parasitic gaps
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20259523 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Isaac Gould (Ewha Womans University Medical Center, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 110-121 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4131 • E-ISSN: 1710-1115 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/cnj.2019.33 |
| OpenAlex | W3000155441 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
Nissenbaum (2000) and Heck and Himmelreich (2017) (henceforth HH) are two prominent works that are noteworthy for focusing on the interaction of multiple movement dependencies (MMDs) and parasitic gaps (PGs). However, these two works consider disjoint and contrasting types of data paradigms. In this squib, I take both types of paradigms into consideration. In doing so, there are three inter-related questions that arise for our understanding of PGs (and in particular for PGs that involve certain MMDs). The first question asks what the correct descriptive generalizations about PG paradigms are. Going beyond such a generalization, we can also ask how to properly account for the data (and whether a unified analysis is possible). Finally, and more specifically, we can ask how to account for the compositional semantics of PGs, especially those involving MMDs
Ask price · Data science · Discrete mathematics · Disjoint sets · Epistemology · Generalization · Linguistics · Movement (music) · Programming language · Semantics (computer science) · Computer Science · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Mathematics · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Theoretical Computer Science
| Highly cited | No |
|---|