Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Logical form

From GB to minimalism

Bibliographic Data

ID24246017
AuthorsNorbert Hornstein
Year1995
Pages267
Publication date1995-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
Reviewed byLogical form: From GB to Minimalism, Daniel L Everett, 1998
VenueLogical form (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherBlackwell (PUBLISHER)
ISBN9780631179122
Open LibraryOL1122314M
LanguageEN
Citations received131

Comparative and general Grammar · Generative grammar · Grammar, Comparative and general · Grammar, comparative and general, syntax · Linguistics · Syntax

  • Cross-Linguistic Temporal Reference

    Judith Tonhauser•Annual Review of Linguistics•2015

  • Universal Merge and Chinese Relativization

    Open Access•Caimei Yang•Language and Semiotic Studies•2015

  • Wh-in-situ, from the 1980s to Now

    Open Access•Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Lisa Lai‐shen Cheng•Language and Linguistics Compass•2009

  • Semantic Underspecification

    Open Access•Markus Egg•Language and Linguistics Compass•2010

  • Recent Work on Propositions

    Open Access•Peter Hanks•Philosophy Compass•2009

  • Quantification and Second‐Order Monadicity

    Open Access•Paul Pietroski•Philosophical Perspectives•2003

  • Issues on topics

    Open Access•Klaus Schwabe, Kerstin Schwabe et al.•ZAS Papers in Linguistics•2000

  • Focus structure and the referential status of indefinite quantificational expressions

    Open Access•Carsten Breul•ZAS Papers in Linguistics•2001

  • Prolific domains and the left periphery

    Open Access•Kleanthes K Grohmann•ZAS Papers in Linguistics•2000

  • Primitive C-Command

    Open Access•Robert Frank, K Vijay‐shanker•Syntax•2001

  • On Matrix-Clause Intervention in Accusative-and-Infinitive Constructions

    Open Access•Ad Neeleman, Amanda Payne•Syntax•2020

  • Antecedents-contained Deletion in Negative Polarity Items

    Open Access•Jason Merchant•Syntax•2000

  • A Local Encoding of Syntactic Dependencies and Its Consequences for the Theory of Movement

    Open Access•Ad Neeleman, Hans Van De Koot•Syntax•2010

  • Overt Object Shift in Japanese

    Open Access•Masao Ochi•Syntax•2009

  • Across-the-board Movement and LF

    Open Access•Željko Bošović, Steven Frank et al.•Syntax•2000

  • Binding principles and ACD constructions in child grammars

    Open Access•Hirohisa Kiguchi, Russell Thornton et al.•Syntax•2004

  • Covert Movement in Multiple‐ Wh Questions

    Open Access•Ur Shlonsky, Sandra Villata et al.•Syntax•2020

  • Why the Binding Theory Doesn't Apply at LF

    Open Access•Glyn Hicks•Syntax•2008

  • The universal base hypothesis

    Open Access•Hans Broekhuis•Linguistics in the Netherlands•2006

  • Locative inversion in English

    Open Access•Hans Broekhuis•Linguistics in the Netherlands•2005

  • Phases and argument ellipsis in Japanese

    Open Access•Yuta Sakamoto•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2016

  • Case, Phases, and Nominative/Accusative Conversion in Japanese

    Open Access•Megumi Takahashi, Masahiko Takahashi•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2010

  • Derivational economy in composite probing

    Open Access•Huacheng Cao•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2025

  • On wh-copying in Mon

    Open Access•Isaac Gould•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2021

  • WCO, ACD and what they reveal about complex demonstratives

    Open Access•Daniel Altshuler•Natural Language Semantics•2007

  • Quantifier Raising out of Mandarin relative clauses

    Open Access•Huilei Wang•Natural Language Semantics•2023

  • A Machine Learning Approach to Modeling Scope Preferences

    Open Access•Derrick Higgins, Jerrold M Sadock•Computational Linguistics•2003

  • Logical Form – Not logical enough for logic, not linguistic enough for linguistics

    Open Access•Patrick Duffley•Journal of Pragmatics•2021

  • Quantifier Float, Focus, and Scope in Thai

    Open Access•Peter Jenks•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•2013

  • A Quantifier Approach to Negation in Natural Languages

    Open Access•Helmut WeiSS•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2002

  • Anti-locality and clause types

    Kleanthes K Grohmann•Theoretical Linguistics•2002

  • The acquisition of multiple wh-questions by high-proficiency non-native speakers of English

    Open Access•Robert Bley-V roman, Naoko Yoshinaga•Second language Research•2000

  • Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers

    Open Access•Roger Hawkins, Hajime Hattori•Second language Research•2006

  • Thematic chains

    Open Access•Cilene Rodrigues•DELTA Documentação de Estudos em…•2004

  • O Princípio De Projeção Estendida No Português Brasileiro

    Open Access•Esmeralda Vailati Negrão•Revista Letras•2001

  • Scope, structure, and expert systems

    Joseph Aoun, Yen-Hui Audrey Li•Language•2000

  • Quantifier Scope in English, Chinese, and Japanese

    Susumu Kuno, Ken-Ichi Takami et al.•Language•1999

  • The Syntax and Semantics of Unselected Embedded Questions

    Open Access•David Adger, Josep Quer•Language•2001

  • Mayan agent focus and the ergative extraction constraint

    Open Access•Jessica Coon, Nico Baier et al.•Language•2021

  • Scope Processing in Chinese

    Open Access•Peng Zhou, Liqun Gao•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2009

  • Why children aren't universally successful with quantification

    Open Access•Julien Musolino, Jeffrey Lidz•Linguistics•2006

  • The morphological dimension of polarity licensing

    Open Access•Paolo Acquaviva•Linguistics•2002

  • A Note on Weakest Crossover

    E G Ruys•Linguistic Inquiry•2004

  • On the “Undoing” Property of Scrambling

    Shigeru Miyagawa•Linguistic Inquiry•2006

  • Reconstruction, Binding Theory, and the Interpretation of Chains

    Danny Fox•Linguistic Inquiry•1999

  • Wh-in-Situ in Mandarin Chinese

    Hooi Ling Soh•Linguistic Inquiry•2005

  • Superiority and Scope Freezing

    Richard K Larson, Svitlana Antonyuk et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2019

  • Size Matters

    Martina Gračanin-Yuksek•Linguistic Inquiry•2016

  • The Principle of Minimal Compliance

    Norvin Richards•Linguistic Inquiry•1998

  • Agreement without A-Positions

    Elizabeth Ritter, Sara Thomas Rosen•Linguistic Inquiry•2005

  • On the Syntax of Multiple Sluicing and What It Tells Us aboutWh-Scope Taking

    Klaus Abels, Veneeta Dayal•Linguistic Inquiry•2023

  • An A-Binding Asymmetry in Null Subject Languages and Its Significance for Universal Grammar

    Phoevos Panagiotidis, Stavroula Tsiplakou•Linguistic Inquiry•2006

  • On the Absence of Superiority and Weak Crossover Effects in Yoruba

    Oluseye Adesola•Linguistic Inquiry•2006

  • Single-Pair versus Multiple-Pair Answers

    Veneeta Dayal•Linguistic Inquiry•2002

  • Vehicle Change and Reconstruction in Ā-Chains

    Ken Safir•Linguistic Inquiry•1999

  • On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree

    Zeljko Boskovic•Linguistic Inquiry•2007

  • Remarks on "Gapping" in DP

    Masaya Yoshida, Honglei Wang et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2012

  • A Minimalist Condition on Semantic Reconstruction

    E G Ruys•Linguistic Inquiry•2015

  • The Diverse Nature of Noninterrogative Wh

    J-Marc Authier, J ­Marc Authier et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2005

  • Quantificational Binding Does Not Require C-Command

    Chris Barker•Linguistic Inquiry•2012

  • Resumption, Movement, and Derivational Economy

    Joseph Aoun, Lina Choueiri et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  • Weak Crossover as a Scope Phenomenon

    E G Ruys•Linguistic Inquiry•2000

  • Anaphor Binding

    Isabelle Charnavel, Dominique Sportiche•Linguistic Inquiry•2016

  • The Structure of Bounded Events

    Ellen Thompson•Linguistic Inquiry•2006

  • Multiple Wh-Fronting

    Günther Grewendorf•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  • QR Obeys Superiority

    Benjamin Bruening•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  • Word Order and Scope

    Jonathan David Bobaljik, Susi Wurmbrand•Linguistic Inquiry•2012

  • ChineseWh-in-Situ and Islands

    Jiayi Lu, Cynthia K Thompson et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2020

  • Movement and Control

    Norbert Hornstein•Linguistic Inquiry•1999

  • Team Weak Crossover

    Calixto Agüero-Bautista•Linguistic Inquiry•2012

  • Depictive Secondary Predicates and Small Clause Approaches to Argument Structure

    Benjamin Bruening•Linguistic Inquiry•2018

  • CP-Negation and the Domain of Quantifier Raising

    Eric Potsdam•Linguistic Inquiry•2013

  • V P-fronting with and without remnant movement

    Open Access•Gary Thoms, George Walkden•Journal of Linguistics•2018

  • Perception and control

    Open Access•Claudia Felser•Journal of Linguistics•1998

  • Deriving object-verb order in late Middle English

    Open Access•Wim Van Der Wurff•Journal of Linguistics•1997

  • Temporal dependency and the syntax of subjects

    Open Access•Ellen Thompson•Journal of Linguistics•2001

  • Multiple movement dependencies and parasitic gaps

    Open Access•Isaac Gould•The Canadian Journal of…•2020

  • Condition C Effects in Nuu-chah-nulth

    Open Access•Hilda J Davis, Henry Davis et al.•The Canadian Journal of…•2007

  • Movement Chains at the Interfaces

    Open Access•Anna Maria Di Sciullo, Daniela Isac•The Canadian Journal of…•2008

  • Phrasal Movement and Its Kin

    David Pesetsky•Phrasal Movement and Its Kin•2000

  • Move F and Ga/No Conversion in Japanese

    Open Access•Masao Ochi•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2001

  • The Structure of Extended Nominal Phrases

    Open Access•Ruriko Kawashima•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•1998

  • ‘Multiple Sluicing’ in Japanese and the Functional Nature of wh-Phrases

    Open Access•Taisuke Nishigauchi•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•1998

  • In Situ Interpretation without Type Mismatches

    Edward L Keenan•Journal of Semantics•2014

  • Attitude Problems

    Graeme Forbes•ATTITUDE PROBLEMS: AN ESSAY ON…•2006

  • Merging features

    Jill De Villiers, Smith College et al.•Merging features•2008

  • Quantifier Scope Ambiguities

    Open Access•Katalin E Ki, Katalin É Kiss et al.•The Wiley Blackwell Companion to…•2017

  • Pied‐Piping

    Open Access•Julia Horvath•The Wiley Blackwell Companion to…•2017

  • Partial Wh‐ Movement

    Open Access•Gisbert Fanselow•The Wiley Blackwell Companion to…•2017

  • German is a multiple wh-fronting language!

    Kleanthes K Grohmann•Multiple Wh-fronting•2003

  • Inverse Linking

    Open Access•Robert May, Alan Bale•The Wiley Blackwell Companion to…•2017

  • Long‐Distance Anaphora

    Open Access•Isabelle Charnavel, C-T James Huang et al.•The Wiley Blackwell Companion to…•2017

  • Multiple Wh‐ Questions

    Open Access•Veneeta Dayal•The Wiley Blackwell Companion to…•2017

  • The Syntax of German

    Open Access•Hubert Haider•Syntax of German•2010

  • What VP Ellipsis Can Do, and What it Can't, But Not Why

    Kyle Johnson•The Handbook of Contemporary…•2001

  • Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure

    Mark C Baker•Elements of Grammar•1997

  • The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis

    Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck, Tanja Temmerman•Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis•2018

  • The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity

    Jessica Coon, Diane Massam et al.•The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity•2017

  • Information structure and the referential status of linguistic expression

    Open Access•Klaus Von Heusinger, Klaus Schwabe et al.•ZAS Papers in Linguistics•2001

  • From Greek to Germanic

    Thomas Leu•Merging features•2009

Citations per year4.52
Citation span1997 - 2025 (29)
Highly citedYes

Tools

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae