A Psychometric Reexamination of Kolb'S Experiential Learning Cycle Construct
A Separation of Level, Style, and Process
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20284227 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steven M De Ciantis (Occupational Research Centre), M J Kirton (Occupational Research Centre) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 809-820 |
| Publication date | 1996-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Educational and Psychological Measurement (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-1644 • E-ISSN: 1552-3888 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0013164496056005007 |
| OpenAlex | W2064935291 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 21 |
The study examined Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory through a psychometric analysis and revision of Honey and Mumford's Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ) using a sample of 185 middle/senior managers in the UK and Eire. Kolb's theoretical two bipolar-dimension orthogonal structure emerges, although it is made up of pairs that are not Kolb's configurative opposites but ones suggested by other scholars. The authors' principal finding is that no single measure can bear the weight of all of Kolb's constructs. The revision of the LSQ supports two psychometrically sound, orthogonally related, bipolar-style dimensions. Indirectly, this construct can give rise to four descriptions, based on their quadrants, that Kolb usefully treats as types. Unrelated to any measure is a four-stage process that the authors define as an ideal dynamic schema
Cognitive psychology · Construct (python library) · Developmental psychology · Dimension (graph theory) · Experiential learning · Mathematics education · Psychometrics · Schema (genetic algorithms) · Emotional Intelligence and Performance · Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences · Management and Marketing Education · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Factorial Validity and Internal Reliability of Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire
Factorial Validity and Internal Reliability of Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire
Adaptation française du Learning Styles Questionnaire de Honey et Mumford
More than experience? - On the unique opportunities of virtual reality to afford a holistic experiential learning cycle
Measuring and mapping team interaction
Kolb’s Learning Style Instrument
Teachers using learning styles
A Reader Responds to Andreou, Andreou, & Vlachos's “Learning Styles and Performance in Second Language Tasks”
Adaptors and innovators
Convergent Validity of Four Innovativeness Scales
Reliability and Construct Validity of Alternate Forms of the Learning Style Inventory
A Factor Analysis of Kolb'S Revised Learning Style Inventory
Improving the Reliability of Kolb's Revised Learning Style Inventory
Factor Analysis of the 1985 Revision of Kolb's Learning Style Inventory
The Validity of the Learning Style Inventory 1985 as a Predictor of Cognitive Style and Occupational Preference
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Reliability of the Learning Style Inventory
Styles of Creativity
Kolb's Learning Style Inventory—1985
Individuality in Learning
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,28 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2021 (25) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |