An Evaluation of the Replicable Factor Analytic Solutions Algorithm for Variable Selection
A Simulation Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20287366 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel A Sass (0000-0001-6774-9102, University of Texas at San Antonio, USA, corresponding author), Michael A Sanchez (0000-0001-8621-8569, H-E-B and University of Texas at San Antonio, USA) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 393-427 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Educational and Psychological Measurement (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-1644 • E-ISSN: 1552-3888 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00131644251377381 |
| PMID | 41195449 |
| OpenAlex | W4415791553 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
Observed variable and factor selection are critical components of factor analysis, particularly when the optimal subset of observed variables and the number of factors are unknown and results cannot be replicated across studies. The Replicable Factor Analytic Solutions (RFAS) algorithm was developed to assess the replicability of factor structures—both in terms of the number of factors and the variables retained—while identifying the “best” or most replicable solutions according to predefined criteria. This study evaluated RFAS performance across 54 experimental conditions that varied in model complexity (six-factor models), interfactor correlations (ρ = 0, .30, and .60), and sample sizes ( n = 300, 500, and 1000). Under default settings, RFAS generally performed well and demonstrated its utility in producing replicable factor structures. However, performance declined with highly correlated factors, smaller sample sizes, and more complex models. RFAS was also compared to four alternative variable selection methods: Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Weighted Group Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and stepwise procedures based on target Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) and ΔTLI criteria. Stepwise and LASSO methods were largely ineffective at eliminating problematic variables under the studied conditions. In contrast, both RFAS and ACO successfully removed variables as intended, although the resulting factor structures often differed substantially between the two approaches. As with other variable selection methods, refining algorithmic criteria may be necessary to further enhance model performance
Factor (programming language) · Feature selection · Lasso (programming language) · Sample (material) · Sample size determination · Selection (genetic algorithm) · Variable (mathematics) · Variables · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
A First Course in Factor Analysis
Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors
Variable selection – A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician
Exploratory graph analysis
The Application of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Applied Psychology
A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research
In Search of Underlying Dimensions
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.
Sample size in factor analysis.
Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research
The Quality of Factor Solutions in Exploratory Factor Analysis
Item Selection for the Development of Short Forms of Scales Using an Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm
A Comparative Investigation of Rotation Criteria Within Exploratory Factor Analysis
A Variable Selection Algorithm for Creating Replicable Factor Structures
| Highly cited | No |
|---|