Changing Conception of Sources of Memory Development
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20293945 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michelene T H Chi, Michelene T H (University of Pittsburgh, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 50-56 |
| Publication date | 2009-12-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-716X • E-ISSN: 1423-0054 |
| Publisher | S. Karger AG (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.1159/000272935 |
| OpenAlex | W2011880361 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 5 |
Explanations for memory development have tended to focus on acquisition of general strategies and metaknowledge. Recently, emphasis has been given to the knowledge base as a whole, including general world-knowledge and domain-specific knowledge and procedures. Evidence is presented from the memory development literature showing why strategies and metaknowledge, although undoubtedly important in development, are not sufficient factors to account for memory development, especially if considered in isolation. Current research on the influence of the general knowledge base and the kinds of questions that must be considered by future research are summarized
Cognition · Cognitive development · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Developmental psychology · Focus (optics) · General knowledge · Isolation (microbiology) · Knowledge base · Memory development · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Memory Processes and Influences · Neuroscience · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.12 |
| Citation span | 1992 - 2024 (33) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |